Borders Tyrone F, Booth Brenda M, Curran Geoffrey M, Ounpraseuth Songthip
College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Division of Health Services Research, Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Rural Ment Health. 2024 Oct;48(4):267-278. doi: 10.1037/rmh0000268. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Rural/urban disparities in cocaine use treatment are commonly attributed to variations in social epidemiological constructs, such as socioeconomic status and well-being, social capital and support, and discrimination, as well as health care attitudes and health beliefs. This study examined whether these factors mediate rural vs. urban disparities in perceived need for cocaine use treatment, a concept closely linked to treatment utilization. Data were collected from 200 rural and 200 urban African American/Black persons who were active cocaine users and not in treatment. A multiple mediation model using path analysis was estimated to determine whether Addiction Severity Index (ASI) employment and legal scores, community trust, social support, rejection/discrimination, religious coping, medical skepticism, perceived treatment privacy and effectiveness, and Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression scores were mediators of the association between rural/urban residence and perceived treatment need. The total indirect effect of the multiple mediators was significant (unstandardized bootstrapped estimate of 0.444 and 95% CI of 0.11, 0.81). Unstandardized bootstrapped estimates for individual significant ( < .05) mediators were as follows: ASI employment scores (-0.114), ASI legal scores (0.146), perceived treatment effectiveness (0.294), and PHQ-9 scores (0.113). To further reduce rural and urban disparities in perceived need for treatment, policymakers, treatment managers, and providers might consider programs that address cocaine users' underlying social epidemiological differences.
可卡因使用治疗方面的城乡差异通常归因于社会流行病学结构的差异,如社会经济地位与福祉、社会资本与支持、歧视,以及医疗保健态度和健康观念。本研究考察了这些因素是否在可卡因使用治疗感知需求的城乡差异中起中介作用,这一概念与治疗利用密切相关。数据收集自200名农村和200名城市非裔美国/黑人可卡因使用者,他们均未接受治疗。采用路径分析估计了一个多重中介模型,以确定成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)就业和法律得分、社区信任、社会支持、排斥/歧视、宗教应对、医学怀疑论、感知治疗隐私和有效性,以及患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)抑郁得分是否为城乡居住与感知治疗需求之间关联的中介因素。多重中介因素的总间接效应显著(非标准化自抽样估计值为0.444,95%置信区间为0.11,0.81)。个别显著(<.05)中介因素的非标准化自抽样估计值如下:ASI就业得分(-0.114)、ASI法律得分(0.146)、感知治疗有效性(0.294)和PHQ-9得分(0.113)。为了进一步缩小治疗感知需求方面的城乡差异,政策制定者医疗保健态度和健康观念。本研究考察了这些因素是否在可卡因使用治疗感知需求的城乡差异中起中介作用,这一概念与治疗利用密切相关。数据收集自200名农村和200名城市非裔美国/黑人可卡因使用者,他们均未接受治疗。采用路径分析估计了一个多重中介模型,以确定成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)就业和法律得分、社区信任、社会支持、排斥/歧视、宗教应对、医学怀疑论、感知治疗隐私和有效性,以及患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)抑郁得分是否为城乡居住与感知治疗需求之间关联的中介因素。多重中介因素的总间接效应显著(非标准化自抽样估计值为0.444,95%置信区间为0.11,0.81)。个别显著(<.05)中介因素的非标准化自抽样估计值如下:ASI就业得分(-0.114)、ASI法律得分(0.146)、感知治疗有效性(0.294)和PHQ-9得分(0.113)。为了进一步缩小治疗感知需求方面的城乡差异,政策制定者、治疗管理者和提供者可能会考虑开展一些项目,以解决可卡因使用者潜在的社会流行病学差异。