He Hua, Yi Changsheng, Hu Wenteng, Zhou Yu, Zeng Xiaofei, Zhang Quan, Sun Shuo, Lin Ruijiang, Yue Peng, Ma Minjie, Chen Chang
The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8280-8291. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1346. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
The optimal extent of lymph node resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate in the medical community. We aimed to assess the surgical and prognostic outcomes based on the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for resectable clinical stage IA NSCLC.
From 2016 to 2018, 1,166 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection (C-MLND) or selective mediastinal lymph node dissection (S-MLND) at five hospitals were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, survival and disease control were compared between the groups.
S-MLND and C-MLND were performed on 197 and 969 patients, respectively. After PSM, each group comprised 126 patients and there was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C-MLND S-MLND, 87.5% 82.9%; P=0.32) or overall survival (OS) (C-MLND S-MLND, 92.0% 95.9%; P=0.39) between the groups. Similar results were observed for perioperative parameters, pN2 detection (6.3% 4.8%, P=0.11) and recurrence patterns (P=0.28). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the S-MLND cohort than that in the C-MLND cohort (12.7% 23.0%, P=0.03).
S-MLND demonstrated outcomes that were comparable to those of C-MLND and a reduction in complications, indicating the potential of S-MLND as an alternative approach for selected patients with stage IA NSCLC. Prospective, randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and establish clear clinical guidelines.
早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)淋巴结切除的最佳范围仍是医学界争论的话题。我们旨在基于可切除的临床IA期NSCLC的纵隔淋巴结清扫(MLND)范围评估手术及预后结果。
2016年至2018年,纳入了在五家医院接受肺叶切除术或肺段切除术并进行完全纵隔淋巴结清扫(C-MLND)或选择性纵隔淋巴结清扫(S-MLND)的1166例临床IA期NSCLC患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以减少选择偏倚。比较两组的围手术期参数、术后并发症、生存率和疾病控制情况。
分别对197例和969例患者进行了S-MLND和C-MLND。PSM后,每组各有126例患者,两组间5年无复发生存率(RFS)(C-MLND对S-MLND,87.5%对82.9%;P=0.32)或总生存率(OS)(C-MLND对S-MLND,92.0%对95.9%;P=0.39)无显著差异。围手术期参数、pN2检出率(6.3%对4.8%,P=0.11)和复发模式(P=0.28)也观察到类似结果。然而,S-MLND队列的术后并发症发生率显著低于C-MLND队列(12.7%对23.0%,P=0.03)。
S-MLND显示出与C-MLND相当的结果且并发症减少,表明S-MLND作为IA期NSCLC特定患者的替代方法具有潜力。建议进行前瞻性随机试验以证实这些发现并建立明确的临床指南。