• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: economic evaluation based on the C-GALL trial.

作者信息

Hernández Rodolfo A, Ahmed Irfan, Edwards Karen, Hudson Jemma, Gillies Katie, Bruce Rebecca, Bell Victoria, Avenell Alison, Blazeby Jane, Brazzelli Miriam, Cotton Seonaidh, Croal Bernard, MacLennan Graeme, Murchie Peter, Ramsay Craig R

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Dec 24;112(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae293.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae293
PMID:39831722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11744463/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d099/11744463/cd9fa53406e4/znae293f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d099/11744463/cd9fa53406e4/znae293f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d099/11744463/cd9fa53406e4/znae293f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: economic evaluation based on the C-GALL trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与非复杂性有症状胆结石的保守治疗：基于C-GALL试验的经济学评估
Br J Surg. 2024 Dec 24;112(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae293.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与保守治疗成人单纯症状性胆囊结石的比较：C-GALL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(26):1-151. doi: 10.3310/MNBY3104.
3
Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial.保守治疗与腹腔镜胆囊切除术预防成人单纯症状性胆囊结石病（C-GALL 试验）复发症状和并发症的效果：实用、多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Dec 6;383:e075383. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075383.
4
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones (C-Gall trial).一项比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术与观察/保守治疗预防成人单纯症状性胆囊结石（C-Gall 试验）患者复发症状和并发症的随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 25;11(3):e039781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039781.
5
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.与观察/保守治疗相比，胆囊切除术对预防无并发症的有症状胆结石或胆囊炎成人患者复发症状和并发症的临床有效性和成本效益：一项系统评价和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(55):1-101, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18550.
6
Cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared to conservative management in people presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis in India.在印度，对于出现无并发症的症状性胆结石或胆囊炎的患者，胆囊切除术与保守治疗相比的成本效益。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Feb;23(2):215-224. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2160706. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
7
Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholecystectomy versus observation/conservative management for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis.对胆囊切除术与观察/保守治疗单纯性有症状胆结石或胆囊炎的临床及成本效益的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):637-47. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3712-6. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
8
The Symptomatic Outcomes of Cholecystectomy for Gallstones.胆囊结石胆囊切除术的症状性结局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1897. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051897.
9
Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial.限制策略与常规护理治疗胆囊结石伴腹痛患者的胆囊切除术（SECURE）：一项多中心、随机、平行臂、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2322-2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30941-9. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
10
A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol).一项比较限制性策略与常规治疗对有症状胆结石患者胆囊切除术有效性的随机对照试验（SECURE试验方案）。
BMC Surg. 2016 Jul 13;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与保守治疗成人单纯症状性胆囊结石的比较：C-GALL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(26):1-151. doi: 10.3310/MNBY3104.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Abdominal Pain (SECURE-trial).胆囊结石伴腹痛患者行胆囊切除术的限制策略与常规治疗的成本效果比较（SECURE-trial）。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e93-e101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004532. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
3
Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.
基于人群的胆囊良性疾病行胆囊切除术的结局的队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1704-1715. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10287. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.与观察/保守治疗相比，胆囊切除术对预防无并发症的有症状胆结石或胆囊炎成人患者复发症状和并发症的临床有效性和成本效益：一项系统评价和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(55):1-101, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18550.
5
Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness.胆囊切除术后持续和新发症状：胆囊切除术效果的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):709-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2516-9. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
6
A randomized controlled study of uncomplicated gallstone disease with a 14-year follow-up showed that operation was the preferred treatment.一项对单纯性胆囊疾病进行的 14 年随访随机对照研究表明，手术是首选治疗方法。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(4):270-6. doi: 10.1159/000329464. Epub 2011 Jul 9.