Suppr超能文献

青少年时期的孤独感与成年后的健康和幸福感:一种全结果纵向研究方法。

Loneliness During Adolescence and Subsequent Health and Well-Being in Adulthood: An Outcome-Wide Longitudinal Approach.

作者信息

Kim Eric S, Wilkinson Renae, Holt-Lunstad Julianne, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2025 Jul;77(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.12.011. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Intergovernmental organizations, such as the World Health Organization, policymakers, scientists, and the public alike are recognizing the importance of loneliness for health/well-being outcomes. However, it remains unclear if loneliness in adolescence shapes health/well-being in adulthood. We examined if increase in loneliness during adolescence was associated with worse health/well-being in adulthood, across 41 outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal study using data from Add Health-a prospective and nationally representative cohort of community-dwelling U.S. adolescents. Using regression models, we evaluated if an increase in loneliness over 1 year (between Wave I, 1994-1995 and Wave II, 1996) was associated with worse health/well-being outcomes 11.37 years later (in Wave IV, 2008; N = 11,040) or 20.64 years later (in Wave V, 2016-2018; N = 9,003). Participants were aged 15.28 years at study onset and aged 28.17 or 37.20 years during the final assessment.

RESULTS

Participants with the highest (vs. lowest) loneliness had worse outcomes on 4 (of 7) mental health outcomes (e.g., higher likelihood of depression (relative risk= 1.25, confidence interval [CI] = 1.06, 1.49, p = .010), 3 (of 4) psychological well-being outcomes (e.g., lower optimism [β = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.23, -0.01, p = .030]), 2 (of 7) social outcomes (e.g., lower romantic relationship quality (β = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.19, 0.00, p = .043), one (of 13) physical health outcomes (e.g., higher likelihood of asthma (relative risk= 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.53, p = .041), and 0 (of 9) health behavior outcomes and 0 (of 2) civic/prosocial outcomes.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest the promise of testing scalable loneliness interventions and policies during adolescence to better determine their impact on various outcomes.

摘要

目的

政府间组织,如世界卫生组织、政策制定者、科学家以及公众都逐渐认识到孤独对健康/幸福状况的重要性。然而,目前尚不清楚青少年时期的孤独是否会影响成年后的健康/幸福状况。我们研究了青少年时期孤独感的增加是否与成年后41项健康/幸福状况指标变差有关。

方法

我们使用“青少年健康纵向研究”(Add Health)的数据进行了一项纵向研究,该研究是一个具有全国代表性的美国社区青少年前瞻性队列。我们采用回归模型评估在1年时间内(1994 - 1995年的第一波调查和1996年的第二波调查之间)孤独感的增加是否与11.37年后(2008年的第四波调查;N = 11,040)或20.64年后(2016 - 2018年的第五波调查;N = 9,003)健康/幸福状况变差有关。研究开始时参与者的年龄为15.28岁,最终评估时年龄为28.17岁或37.20岁。

结果

孤独感最高(与最低相比)的参与者在7项心理健康指标中的4项(如抑郁可能性更高(相对风险 = 1.25,置信区间[CI] = 1.06, 1.49,p = 0.010))、4项心理幸福感指标中的3项(如乐观程度较低[β = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.23, -0.01,p = 0.030])、7项社会指标中的2项(如恋爱关系质量较低(β = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.19, 0.00,p = 0.043))、13项身体健康指标中的1项(如患哮喘的可能性更高(相对风险 = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.53,p = 0.041))上表现较差,而在9项健康行为指标中的0项以及2项公民/亲社会指标中的0项上没有差异。

讨论

这些发现表明在青少年时期测试可扩展的孤独干预措施和政策具有前景,以便更好地确定它们对各种结果的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验