• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种自我筛查工具和患者警示卡,以帮助患者识别和管理严重药物不良反应。

Evaluation of a self-screening tool and patient alert cards to help patients identify and manage severe adverse drug reactions.

作者信息

Srisuriyachanchai Warisara, Foocharoen Chingching, Mahakkanukrauh Ajanee, Cox Anthony R, Jarernsiripornkul Narumol

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Division of Allergy-Immunology-Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun;47(3):726-736. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9
PMID:39832062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the use of self-screening tools and patient alert cards (PAC) for screening adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

AIM

To evaluate the benefits of self-screening tools and PAC for screening ADRs.

METHOD

A prospective study of outpatients was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The sample included patients over 18 years of age who were currently taking one of four prescription medicines-methotrexate, sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, or prednisolone. A self-screening tool was distributed to patients in either hard copy or on-line format depending on patient preference. Simple random sampling was used to assign patients to either receive a PAC or not.

RESULTS

A total of 922 self-screening tools were distributed with 709 returned (71.5%). Over half (n = 388) of the respondents reported a total of 3437 symptoms that they credited to their medication. The most commonly reported symptom was angioedema (15.8%). The majority of patients (76.7%) used the temporal relationship between the onset of symptoms and the administration of the drug to decide if their ADR was associated with the drug and this proportion was higher in respondents who selected the online self-screening tool (70.7% and 83.2%, p = 0.040). Half of the patients reported high satisfaction with their PACs.

CONCLUSION

Providing patients with a self-screening tool and a PAC supported patients to report more ADRs compared to rates for spontaneous reporting alone. We propose that they should be provided to all patients to increase ADR reporting and to encourage HCPs to provide drug information, thereby improving patient medication safety.

摘要

背景

很少有研究探讨使用自我筛查工具和患者警示卡(PAC)来筛查药物不良反应(ADR)。

目的

评估自我筛查工具和PAC在筛查ADR方面的益处。

方法

在一家三级护理教学医院对门诊患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。样本包括18岁以上目前正在服用四种处方药之一(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶、环孢素或泼尼松龙)的患者。根据患者偏好,以纸质版或在线形式向患者发放自我筛查工具。采用简单随机抽样将患者分为接受PAC组和不接受PAC组。

结果

共发放922份自我筛查工具,回收709份(71.5%)。超过一半(n = 388)的受访者报告了总共3437种他们认为与药物有关的症状。最常报告的症状是血管性水肿(15.8%)。大多数患者(76.7%)利用症状出现与用药之间的时间关系来判断他们的ADR是否与药物有关,在选择在线自我筛查工具的受访者中这一比例更高(70.7%和83.2%,p = 0.040)。一半的患者对他们的PAC表示高度满意。

结论

与仅靠自发报告的比率相比,为患者提供自我筛查工具和PAC能支持患者报告更多的ADR。我们建议应向所有患者提供这些工具,以增加ADR报告,并鼓励医护人员提供药物信息,从而提高患者用药安全性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a self-screening tool and patient alert cards to help patients identify and manage severe adverse drug reactions.评估一种自我筛查工具和患者警示卡,以帮助患者识别和管理严重药物不良反应。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun;47(3):726-736. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Confidence and accuracy in identification of adverse drug reactions reported by outpatients.门诊患者报告的药物不良反应识别的可信度和准确性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1559-1567. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0732-7. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
4
Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员对药物不良事件的报告率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD012594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012594.pub2.
5
Comparison of documentation of patient reported adverse drug reactions on both paper-based medication charts and electronic medication charts at a New Zealand hospital.新西兰一家医院纸质药物图表与电子药物图表上患者报告的药物不良反应记录情况比较。
N Z Med J. 2016 Oct 28;129(1444):90-96.
6
Pattern of adverse drug reactions notified by spontaneous reporting in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital.印度一家三级护理教学医院通过自发报告通报的药物不良反应模式。
Pharmacol Res. 2006 Sep;54(3):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 May 12.
7
Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院的药品不良反应的发生率、类型、严重程度、可预防性及成本
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Sep-Oct;81:323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Consumer views on the use of digital tools for reporting adverse drug reactions: a cross-sectional study.消费者对使用数字工具报告药物不良反应的看法:一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Apr;47(2):423-434. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01847-2. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
Patient self-reporting of potential adverse drug reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Thailand.泰国患者对非甾体抗炎药潜在药物不良反应的自我报告
Pharm World Sci. 2009 Oct;31(5):559-564. doi: 10.1007/s11096-009-9310-3. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
10
Adverse Drug Reactions Spontaneously Reported at a Tertiary Care Hospital and Preventable Measures Implemented.在一家三级保健医院报告的药物不良反应和实施的预防措施。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Apr;46(2):460-469. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13306. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Severity and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions Reported by Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Survey.患者和医疗保健专业人员报告的药物不良反应的严重程度和管理:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043725.
2
Evaluating patient and physician knowledge of risks and safe use of rivaroxaban: a survey across four countries.评估患者和医生对利伐沙班风险和安全使用的认知:四个国家的调查。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2022 Mar;21(3):435-446. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2022.1998451. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Apixaban Additional Risk Minimisation Measures Using Surveys in Europe.
评估阿哌沙班附加风险最小化措施在欧洲的使用效果:调查研究。
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Mar;35(2):123-135. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00380-1. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Mobile health technologies for the management of rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of online stores in Brazil.移动医疗技术在风湿性疾病管理中的应用:巴西在线药店的系统评价。
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;40(7):2601-2609. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05561-y. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Evaluation of patients' knowledge about oral anticoagulant medicines and use of alert cards by community pharmacists.评估社区药剂师对口服抗凝药物的认知和使用警示卡的情况。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01134-w. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
Experiences and Views of Medicine Information Among the General Public in Thailand.泰国普通民众对医学信息的认知与看法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jun 30;14:1073-1082. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S257454. eCollection 2020.
7
Rituximab utilization for approved and off-label nononcology indications and patients' experiences with the Patient Alert Card.利妥昔单抗在批准的非肿瘤适应证和非适应证中的应用及患者对患者警示卡的体验。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Jan 3;8(1):e00555. doi: 10.1002/prp2.555. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Factors influencing online health information seeking behaviour among patients in Kwahu West Municipal, Nkawkaw, Ghana.影响加纳恩卡考夸夸胡西市患者在线健康信息搜索行为的因素
Online J Public Health Inform. 2019 Sep 19;11(2):e13. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v11i2.10141. eCollection 2019.
9
Development of a methotrexate educational guide/information/monitoring booklet for inflammatory arthritis.用于炎性关节炎的甲氨蝶呤教育指南/信息/监测手册的编制
Musculoskeletal Care. 2019 Jun;17(2):234-241. doi: 10.1002/msc.1398. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Confidence and accuracy in identification of adverse drug reactions reported by outpatients.门诊患者报告的药物不良反应识别的可信度和准确性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1559-1567. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0732-7. Epub 2018 Oct 26.