• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.开放病历时代以患者为中心的文档记录指南:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;11:e59301. doi: 10.2196/59301.
2
A Patient-Centered Documentation Skills Curriculum for Preclerkship Medical Students in an Open Notes Era.以患者为中心的开放病历时代医学生临床前文书技能课程
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Mar 26;20:11392. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11392. eCollection 2024.
3
The Impact of Collaborative Documentation on Person-Centered Care: Textual Analysis of Clinical Notes.协作式文档对以患者为中心的护理的影响:临床记录的文本分析。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Sep 20;12:e52678. doi: 10.2196/52678.
4
The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients.临床医生与患者共享病历记录的观点和体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201753. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1753.
5
Generative Language Models and Open Notes: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.生成式语言模型与开放病历:探索其前景与局限。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jan 4;10:e51183. doi: 10.2196/51183.
6
Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study.跨性别者查看电子健康记录的体验:一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):970-977. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
Medical student documentation in electronic health records: a collaborative statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education.医学生在电子健康记录中的文档记录:临床教育联盟的协作声明。
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):257-66. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.692284.
8
Charting Diagnostic Safety: Exploring Patient-Provider Discordance in Medical Record Documentation.绘制诊断安全性:探索病历记录中患者与提供者之间的不一致性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):773-781. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09007-y. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
Determining implementation issues of open notes in primary care: a focus group study.确定基层医疗中开放病历的实施问题:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02805-1.
10
Attitudes and Experiences of Clinicians After Mandated Implementation of Open Notes by the 21st Century Cures Act: Survey Study.《21 世纪治愈法案强制实施开放病历后临床医生的态度和体验:调查研究》。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e42021. doi: 10.2196/42021.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Real Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Education: Roundtable Discussion.在本科教育中使用真实电子健康记录:圆桌讨论
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 12;9:e60789. doi: 10.2196/60789.

本文引用的文献

1
A Patient-Centered Documentation Skills Curriculum for Preclerkship Medical Students in an Open Notes Era.以患者为中心的开放病历时代医学生临床前文书技能课程
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Mar 26;20:11392. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11392. eCollection 2024.
2
Adapting to transparent medical records: international experience with "open notes".适应透明的医疗记录:“开放病历”的国际经验。
BMJ. 2022 Nov 21;379:e069861. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069861.
3
US policy requires immediate release of records to patients.美国政策要求立即向患者提供病历记录。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 18;372:n426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n426.
4
Words Matter: What Do Patients Find Judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient Notes?用词需谨慎:门诊病历中,患者觉得哪些用词带有评判或冒犯意味?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2571-2578. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients.临床医生与患者共享病历记录的观点和体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201753. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1753.
6
: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.纪念其四十周年。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):9-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1665402.
7
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.7年后的开放病历:患者持续获取临床医生门诊病历记录的体验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 6;21(5):e13876. doi: 10.2196/13876.
8
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of the Patient Portal Experience with OpenNotes.患者对开放医嘱患者门户体验的定性和定量分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):10-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676588. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Respectful Language and Care in Childhood Obesity.儿童肥胖问题中的尊重性语言与关怀
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1001-1002. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1912.
10
Open Notes in Teaching Clinics: A Multisite Survey of Residents to Identify Anticipated Attitudes and Guidance for Programs.教学诊所中的开放病历:一项针对住院医师的多地点调查,以确定项目预期的态度和指导意见。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):292-300. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00486.1.

开放病历时代以患者为中心的文档记录指南:定性研究

Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Vanka Anita, Johnston Katherine T, Delbanco Tom, DesRoches Catherine M, Garcia Annalays, Salmi Liz, Blease Charlotte

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;11:e59301. doi: 10.2196/59301.

DOI:10.2196/59301
PMID:39832175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11791454/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records ("open notes"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.

OBJECTIVE

At a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records.

METHODS

Through a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings.

RESULTS

The participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients' needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation.

摘要

背景

美国患者最近获得了联邦政府强制规定的、免费且便捷的电子途径,可查阅其病历中临床医生的电子化记录(“开放病历”)。这一与长期以来的做法不同的改变,在临床上对患者有益,但研究表明,一些患者会因病历中嵌入的文字或短语而感到被评判或受辱。因此,临床医生必须采用有助于增强患者权能并尽量减少潜在危害的记录技巧。

目的

在患者、家属和临床医生之间开放透明的沟通能够更轻松地在医疗实践中传播之际,本研究旨在制定关于病历记录的明智指南。

方法

通过一系列焦点小组,由卫生专业人员和患者制定了病历记录语言的初步指南。我们使用结构化的焦点小组决策指南,与不同组别的27名参与者进行了4次小组会议:有书写开放病历经验的医生(n = 5)、习惯查看自己病历的患者(n = 8)、医学生教育工作者(n = 7)和住院医师(n = 7)。为了生成主题,我们采用了迭代编码过程。基于意义的共性,将一阶编码分组为二阶主题。

结果

参与者确定了10条重要指南,作为制定满足患者需求的病历的初步框架。

结论

该过程确定了10个不同的主题,可帮助临床医生使用并推广以患者为中心的记录方式。