• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从乳头状肿瘤到胆管癌的序贯致癌过程中的基因组和转录组特征。

Genomic and transcriptomic signatures of sequential carcinogenesis from papillary neoplasm to biliary tract cancer.

作者信息

Chung Taek, Oh Seungho, Won Jeongsoo, Park Jiho, Yoo Jeong Eun, Hwang Ho Kyoung, Choi Gi Hong, Kang Chang Moo, Han Dai Hoon, Kim Sangwoo, Park Young Nyun

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2025 Jul;83(1):119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.007. Epub 2025 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.007
PMID:39832657
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Papillary neoplasms of the biliary tree, including intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPNs) and intracholecystic papillary neoplasms (ICPNs), are recognized as precancerous lesions. However, the genetic characteristics underlying sequential carcinogenesis remain unclear.

METHODS

Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 166 neoplasms (33 intrahepatic IPNs, 44 extrahepatic IPNs, and 89 ICPNs), and 41 associated carcinomas. Nine available cases were also subjected to spatial transcriptomic analysis.

RESULTS

Mutations in the MAPK (48%), genomic integrity maintenance (42%), and Wnt/β-catenin (33%) pathways were prevalent in intrahepatic IPNs, extrahepatic IPNs, and ICPNs, respectively. KRAS mutations were enriched in intrahepatic IPNs (42%, p <0.001), whereas SMAD4 mutations were enriched in extrahepatic IPNs (21%, p = 0.005). ICPNs frequently exhibit CTNNB1 mutations, particularly in low-grade lesions. Mutational signature analysis revealed that SBS1 and SBS5 signatures were homogeneously enriched in intrahepatic IPNs, in contrast to the heterogeneous distribution of SBS1, SBS2, SBS5, SBS13, SBS7b, and SBS23 in extrahepatic IPNs and ICPNs. Copy number aberrations gradually increased from low-to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually to carcinoma. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 89% of carcinomas were derived from IPNs/ICPNs through sequential carcinogenesis, with the majority sharing driver mutations between the IPN/ICPN and the carcinoma. Furthermore, multifocal, independent carcinogenic events were observed in IPNs/ICPNs, resulting in mutationally distinct carcinoma lesions. Carcinogenesis of IPN/ICPN occurs in multiple subclones through mutational accumulation and transcriptomic alterations that affect vascular development, cell morphogenesis, extracellular matrix organization, and growth factor response.

CONCLUSIONS

With the largest IPN/ICPN cohort reported to date, our study provides a genome- and spatial transcriptome-level portrait of sequential carcinogenesis and differences in the anatomical location of biliary papillary neoplasms.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Biliary tract cancer is a fatal malignancy. However, the genome-level sequential progression from intraepithelial neoplasia to carcinoma has not yet been evaluated in a sufficiently large cohort. Papillary lesions of the bile duct and gallbladder are collectively termed intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct and intracholecystic papillary neoplasms, respectively. They are primarily diagnosed based on histopathological studies. This study provides a comprehensive mutational and spatial transcriptomic landscape of papillary neoplasms of the bile duct and gallbladder. The results of this study offer insights into the mechanism of sequential carcinogenesis in papillary biliary tract tumors, pathology-genomic correlations, and potential therapeutic targets.

摘要

背景与目的

胆管乳头状肿瘤,包括导管内乳头状肿瘤(IPN)和胆囊内乳头状肿瘤(ICPN),被认为是癌前病变。然而,其连续致癌的遗传特征仍不清楚。

方法

对166例肿瘤(33例肝内IPN、44例肝外IPN和89例ICPN)以及41例相关癌进行了全外显子测序。对9例可获取的病例还进行了空间转录组分析。

结果

丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)通路突变(48%)、基因组完整性维持通路突变(42%)和Wnt/β-连环蛋白通路突变(33%)分别在肝内IPN、肝外IPN和ICPN中普遍存在。KRAS突变在肝内IPN中富集(42%,p<0.001),而SMAD4突变在肝外IPN中富集(21%,p = 0.005)。ICPN经常出现CTNNB1突变,尤其是在低级别病变中。突变特征分析显示,SBS1和SBS5特征在肝内IPN中均匀富集,而在肝外IPN和ICPN中,SBS1、SBS2、SBS5、SBS13、SBS7b和SBS23呈异质性分布。拷贝数畸变从低级别到高级别上皮内瘤变逐渐增加,最终发展为癌。系统发育分析显示,89%的癌是通过连续致癌从IPN/ICPN衍生而来,大多数在IPN/ICPN和癌之间共享驱动突变。此外,在IPN/ICPN中观察到多灶性、独立的致癌事件,导致癌病变在突变上不同。IPN/ICPN的致癌过程通过突变积累和转录组改变发生在多个亚克隆中,这些改变影响血管发育、细胞形态发生、细胞外基质组织和生长因子反应。

结论

我们的研究是迄今为止报道的最大规模的IPN/ICPN队列研究,提供了胆管乳头状肿瘤连续致癌的基因组和空间转录组水平的全貌以及解剖位置差异。

影响与意义

胆管癌是一种致命的恶性肿瘤。然而,上皮内瘤变到癌的基因组水平连续进展尚未在足够大的队列中进行评估。胆管和胆囊的乳头状病变分别统称为胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤和胆囊内乳头状肿瘤。它们主要通过组织病理学研究进行诊断。本研究提供了胆管和胆囊乳头状肿瘤全面的突变和空间转录组图谱。本研究结果为胆管乳头状肿瘤连续致癌机制、病理-基因组相关性及潜在治疗靶点提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Genomic and transcriptomic signatures of sequential carcinogenesis from papillary neoplasm to biliary tract cancer.从乳头状肿瘤到胆管癌的序贯致癌过程中的基因组和转录组特征。
J Hepatol. 2025 Jul;83(1):119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.007. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Intracholecystic Papillary Neoplasms Are Distinct From Papillary Gallbladder Cancers: A Clinicopathologic and Exome-sequencing Study.胆囊内乳头状肿瘤不同于胆囊乳头状癌:一项临床病理和外显子组测序研究。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Jun;43(6):783-791. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001237.
3
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.基于分子特征的腹膜后脂肪肉瘤分类:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Elife. 2025 May 23;14:RP100887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100887.
4
Molecular and immunohistochemical analysis of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the biliary tract.胆管内乳头状肿瘤的分子与免疫组化分析
Hum Pathol. 2003 Sep;34(9):902-10. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00337-x.
5
Concurrent Activation of Kras and Canonical Wnt Signaling Induces Premalignant Lesions That Progress to Extrahepatic Biliary Cancer in Mice.Kras 和经典 Wnt 信号的同时激活诱导小鼠肝外胆管癌前病变进展。
Cancer Res. 2022 May 3;82(9):1803-1817. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2176.
6
Expression of cell cycle-related molecules in biliary premalignant lesions: biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and biliary intraductal papillary neoplasm.细胞周期相关分子在胆道癌前病变中的表达:胆管上皮内瘤变和胆管内乳头状肿瘤。
Hum Pathol. 2008 Aug;39(8):1153-61. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 May 20.
7
p53 protects against formation of extrahepatic biliary precancerous lesions in the context of oncogenic Kras.p53 可防止致癌 Kras 背景下肝外胆管癌前病变的形成。
Oncotarget. 2023 Mar 31;14:276-279. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28380.
8
Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.纳洛昔单抗脂质体伊立替康联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸与氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸在吉西他滨治疗后胆管癌和胆囊癌患者中的应用(AIO NALIRICC):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;9(8):734-744. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00119-5. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
Clinical Pathological Features and Carcinogenic Risk Factors of Colorectal Lateral Spreading Tumors With Skirt Features.具有裙边特征的结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床病理特征及致癌危险因素
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun 11;2025:9920606. doi: 10.1155/cjgh/9920606. eCollection 2025.
10
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Grossly visible non-invasive neoplasm of the gallbladder: method of classification and its relationship to pyloric gland adenoma.肉眼可见的胆囊非侵袭性肿瘤:分类方法及其与幽门腺腺瘤的关系
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2025 Jun 15;18(6):245-257. doi: 10.62347/WLEU6787. eCollection 2025.
2
Spatial and temporal dynamics in progressive gallbladder cancer.进展期胆囊癌的时空动态变化
Nat Genet. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02232-z.