• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供者联系腕带能否降低髋关节或膝关节置换术后的急诊科就诊率?

Does a Provider Contact Wristband Reduce Emergency Department Visit Rates Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty?

作者信息

Hein David C, Srivastava Ajay K, Willson Seann E, Telehowski Paul M, Atkinson Patrick J, Atkinson Theresa S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McLaren-Flint, Flint, MI, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2024 Dec 28;31:101599. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101599. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101599
PMID:39835248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11743857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reducing unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits following joint arthroplasty is an important goal. Literature suggests 30-day visit rates range between 4% and 15%, with only 20%-25% of these admitted for care. Low admissions suggest an opportunity to reduce unnecessary postarthroplasty ED visits. This study examined whether a wristband would encourage patients to call the care team with concerns prior to going to the ED.

METHODS

A wristband displaying a contact phone number was placed on patients at discharge. ED visit rates (30 and 90 days) and readmissions (90 days) were tabulated for 2 years prior to and up to 3 years after the implementation of the wristband program. Residents who responded to calls and call logs were also reviewed.

RESULTS

At 2 years after implementation, a total of 1023 joint replacements produced 273 calls or 1 call per 3.75 patients. Nearly half (48.1%) of the calls were received during weekday work hours when the patients had been directed to call the office. While ED visits declined after the implementation of the wristband at both 2 and 3 years, these reductions were not statistically significant (30 days: 5.1% before, 4.1% after; 90 days: 8.1% before, 7.1% after). There was a significant reduction in 90-day readmissions (6.4% before, 4.0% after).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients utilized the wristband number, but this did not significantly reduce the number of ED visits within 3 years. Future studies should track ED visits and identify decision-making factors behind ED use in order to find ways to improve the intervention.

摘要

背景

减少关节置换术后不必要的急诊科就诊是一个重要目标。文献表明30天就诊率在4%至15%之间,其中只有20% - 25%的患者因需要护理而入院。低入院率表明有机会减少关节置换术后不必要的急诊科就诊。本研究探讨了腕带是否会鼓励患者在前往急诊科之前就其担忧联系护理团队。

方法

在出院时为患者佩戴显示联系电话号码的腕带。统计实施腕带计划之前2年以及之后3年的急诊科就诊率(30天和90天)和再入院率(90天)。还对回复电话的住院医师和通话记录进行了审查。

结果

实施后2年,共进行了1023例关节置换手术,产生了273次呼叫,即每3.75名患者有1次呼叫。近一半(48.1%)的呼叫是在工作日工作时间接到的,此时患者已被指示致电办公室。虽然在实施腕带后2年和3年时急诊科就诊次数均有所下降,但这些下降在统计学上并不显著(30天:之前为5.1%,之后为4.1%;90天:之前为8.1%,之后为7.1%)。90天再入院率有显著下降(之前为6.4%,之后为4.0%)。

结论

患者使用了腕带号码,但这在3年内并未显著减少急诊科就诊次数。未来的研究应追踪急诊科就诊情况,并确定使用急诊科背后的决策因素,以便找到改进干预措施的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672c/11743857/28d9380d5f19/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672c/11743857/dcedb1858106/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672c/11743857/28d9380d5f19/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672c/11743857/dcedb1858106/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672c/11743857/28d9380d5f19/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Does a Provider Contact Wristband Reduce Emergency Department Visit Rates Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty?提供者联系腕带能否降低髋关节或膝关节置换术后的急诊科就诊率?
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Dec 28;31:101599. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101599. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Improving Communication Between the Emergency Department and Radiology Department With a Novel Web-Based Tool in an Urban Academic Center.利用一种新型基于网络的工具改善城市学术中心的急诊科与放射科之间的沟通。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):293-296. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Temporal Trends and Predictors of Thirty-Day Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ontario Between 2003 and 2016.2003 年至 2016 年安大略省全膝关节置换术后 30 天内再入院和急诊就诊的时间趋势和预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
4
A Consultation Phone Service for Patients With Total Joint Arthroplasty May Reduce Unnecessary Emergency Department Visits.全膝关节置换术后患者的咨询电话服务可能减少不必要的急诊就诊。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):650-654. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Reasons for Ninety-Day Emergency Visits and Readmissions After Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty: Results From a US Integrated Healthcare System.择期全关节置换术后 90 天内急诊就诊和再入院的原因:来自美国综合医疗保健系统的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2075-2081. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Early Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后的早期急诊就诊情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1915-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Costs for Hospital Returns After Total Joint Arthroplasties.全关节置换术后再入院的发生率、危险因素及费用
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):381-385. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
A randomized trial exploring the effect of a telephone call follow-up on care plan compliance among older adults discharged home from the emergency department.一项随机试验,旨在探索电话随访对从急诊科出院回家的老年患者护理计划依从性的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/acem.12308.
9
Evaluation of Emergency Department Visits Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: Same-Day Discharge vs Non-Same-Day Discharge.全关节置换术后急诊就诊情况评估:当日出院与非当日出院对比
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1017-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.031. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
What Goes Bump in the Night: An Evaluation of Emergency Department Visits Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.夜间的碰撞声:全膝关节置换术后急诊就诊评估。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1232-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.048. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of a Semiautomatic Text Message System to Improve Satisfaction With Wait Time in the Adult Emergency Department: Cross-sectional Survey Study.使用半自动短信系统提高成人急诊科候诊时间满意度:横断面调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Sep 6;10(9):e34488. doi: 10.2196/34488.
2
Emergency department visits following total joint arthroplasty: do revisions present a higher burden?全关节置换术后的急诊科就诊情况:翻修手术是否带来更高的负担?
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jul;3(7):543-548. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0026.R1.
3
Early Emergency Department Visits Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后的早期急诊就诊情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1915-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
Emergency Department Presentation After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的急诊科就诊情况:一项系统综述
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):3038-3045.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Factors associated with emergency department presentation after total joint arthroplasty: a population-based retrospective cohort study.全膝关节置换术后急诊就诊相关因素:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):E26-E33. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190116. Print 2020 Jan-Mar.
6
Emergency Department Visits Within Thirty Days of Discharge After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Hidden Quality Measure.初次全髋关节置换术后 30 天内出院后的急诊科就诊:一个隐藏的质量衡量标准。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030.2014 年至 2030 年美国初次全关节置换术预估量。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617.
8
Medical identification or alert jewellery: an opportunity to save lives or an unreliable hindrance?医疗识别或警示珠宝:挽救生命的机会还是不可靠的障碍?
Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/anae.13958. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Medicare's New Bundled Payments: Design, Strategy, and Evolution.医疗保险的新型捆绑支付:设计、策略与演变
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):131-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18161.
10
A regional survey to determine factors influencing patient choices in selecting a particular emergency department for care.一项区域性调查,旨在确定影响患者选择特定急诊科室进行治疗的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/acem.12063.