Suppr超能文献

慢性神经性疼痛中非侵入性神经调节的循证综合评价

Evidence-Based Umbrella Review of Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

作者信息

Duarte-Moreira Rafael Jardim, Shirahige Lívia, Rodriguez-Prieto Indira Enith, Alves Maércio Maia, Lopes Tiago da Silva, Baptista Rachel Fontes, Hazime Fuad Ahmad, Zana Yossi, Kubota Gabriel Taricani, de Andrade Daniel Ciampi, Yeng Lin Tchia, Teixeira Manoel Jacobsen, Dáquer Egas Caparelli Moniz de Aragão, Sá Katia Nunes, Monte-Silva Kátia, Baptista Abrahão Fontes

机构信息

Center for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil.

Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4786. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4786.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques (NIN), such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), have been extensively researched for their potential to alleviate pain by reversing neuroplastic changes associated with neuropathic pain (NP), a prevalent and complex condition. However, treating NP remains challenging due to the numerous variables involved, such as different techniques, dosages and aetiologies. It is necessary to provide insights for clinicians and public healthcare managers to support clinical decision-making. This umbrella review aims to consolidate existing evidence on the effectiveness of various NIN in managing chronic NP.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database, including meta-analyses of controlled trials comparing NIN techniques with sham interventions for NP treatment. The quality of included studies was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the GRADE system, with effect sizes adjusted to the standard mean difference (SMD).

RESULTS

The review included 22 meta-analyses comprising 8151 participants from 214 controlled trials. The most investigated NIN techniques were tDCS and rTMS, with primary targets being the motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The findings suggest that excitatory protocols, particularly high-frequency rTMS and anodal tDCS, are effective in reducing pain intensity in individuals with NP. However, the overall quality of evidence was rated low, primarily due to heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

NIN techniques show promise in managing NP, with potential benefits in pain reduction. However, further high-quality research is needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effects.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This paper consolidates the evidence regarding non-invasive neuromodulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain, including differentiating the most effective techniques based on the aetiology of pain, and provides clinicians with easy access to this critical information. It also highlights key aspects that require further research in the field of non-invasive neuromodulation and neuropathic pain.

摘要

背景与目的

非侵入性神经调节技术(NIN),如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),因其通过逆转与神经性疼痛(NP)相关的神经可塑性变化来缓解疼痛的潜力而受到广泛研究。NP是一种普遍且复杂的病症。然而,由于涉及众多变量,如不同的技术、剂量和病因,治疗NP仍然具有挑战性。有必要为临床医生和公共卫生管理人员提供见解,以支持临床决策。本伞状综述旨在整合现有证据,以证明各种NIN在管理慢性NP方面的有效性。

数据库与数据处理

在PubMed/MEDLINE数据库中进行了系统检索,包括对比较NIN技术与假干预治疗NP的对照试验的荟萃分析。使用AMSTAR-2工具和GRADE系统评估纳入研究的质量,效应量调整为标准平均差(SMD)。

结果

该综述纳入了22项荟萃分析,涉及来自214项对照试验的8151名参与者。研究最多的NIN技术是tDCS和rTMS,主要靶点是运动皮层和背外侧前额叶皮层。研究结果表明,兴奋性方案,特别是高频rTMS和阳极tDCS,在降低NP患者的疼痛强度方面是有效的。然而,证据的总体质量被评为低,主要是由于研究之间的异质性和样本量小。

结论

NIN技术在管理NP方面显示出前景,在减轻疼痛方面具有潜在益处。然而,需要进一步的高质量研究来确定最佳方案和长期效果。

意义声明

本文整合了关于非侵入性神经调节治疗神经性疼痛的证据,包括根据疼痛病因区分最有效的技术,并为临床医生提供了获取这些关键信息的便捷途径。它还强调了在非侵入性神经调节和神经性疼痛领域需要进一步研究的关键方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验