• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性压力性损伤的结局及影响因素分析:对413例患者的回顾性研究

Analysis of Outcomes and Factors Influencing Community-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Review of 413 Patients.

作者信息

Yang Xiuru, Zhang Dan, Zhang Hongmei, Cui Liangliang, Hu Qin, Hu Yang, Wen Dan, Ma Yanfei, He Qiuhong

机构信息

Xiuru Yang, BSN, RN, Intensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan Province, China.

Dan Zhang, BSN, RN, Intensive Care Unit, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2025;52(1):23-27. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001138. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000001138
PMID:39835997
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes and influencing factors of patients with community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPIs) and provide insights for clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

We reviewed medical records of 413 patients with a total of 522 CAPIs. Patients with CAPIs who were hospitalized at Mianyang Central Hospital, Sichuan Province, China, between December 2021 and December 2022.

METHODS

Depending on CAPI outcome at the time of discharge, the patients were split into "improvement" and "no improvement" groups. Factors influencing CAPI outcomes were examined using univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis (logistic regression).

RESULTS

A majority of patients (n = 324, 78.5%) showed improvement, and 89 (21.5%) showed no improvement. Logistic regression analysis showed statistically significant associations between CAPI outcomes and Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk scores, Barthel Index for Activities of Daily living scores, along with serum albumin, hemoglobin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of patients with CAPIs were influenced by the Braden score, the Barthel score, serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, as well as inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein. To effectively treat and care for patients with CAPIs, nurses should develop customized nursing interventions based on the unique characteristics of patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析社区获得性压力性损伤(CAPI)患者的治疗结果及影响因素,为临床实践提供参考。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究对象与研究地点

我们回顾了413例患者共522处CAPI的病历。这些CAPI患者于2021年12月至2022年12月在中国四川省绵阳市中心医院住院治疗。

方法

根据出院时CAPI的治疗结果,将患者分为“改善”组和“未改善”组。采用单因素分析,随后进行多因素分析(逻辑回归)来研究影响CAPI治疗结果的因素。

结果

大多数患者(n = 324,78.5%)病情有所改善,89例(21.5%)未改善。逻辑回归分析显示,CAPI治疗结果与压疮风险评估的Braden量表评分、日常生活活动能力的Barthel指数评分以及血清白蛋白、血红蛋白、白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白水平之间存在统计学上的显著关联。

结论

CAPI患者的治疗结果受到Braden评分、Barthel评分、血清白蛋白和血红蛋白水平以及炎症标志物(包括白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白)的影响。为有效治疗和护理CAPI患者,护士应根据患者的独特特征制定个性化的护理干预措施。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Outcomes and Factors Influencing Community-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Review of 413 Patients.社区获得性压力性损伤的结局及影响因素分析:对413例患者的回顾性研究
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2025;52(1):23-27. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001138. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
2
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Development Among Surgical Critical Care Patients Admitted With Community-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.外科重症监护病房中因社区获得性压疮入院患者的医院获得性压疮发展:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;47(5):470-476. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000691.
3
Socio-economic and environmental factors associated with community-acquired pressure injuries: A mixed method study.与社区获得性压力性损伤相关的社会经济和环境因素:一项混合方法研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2024 Feb;33(1):27-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
A Retrospective Analysis to Evaluate Seasonal Pressure Injury Incidence Differences Among Hip Fracture Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in East China.一项回顾性分析,以评估中国东部一家三级医院髋部骨折患者季节性压力性损伤发生率的差异
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Feb;64(2):40-44.
5
Transformative Insights into Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries Among the Elderly: A Big Data Analysis.老年人社区获得性压疮的变革性见解:一项大数据分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 15;13(2):153. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020153.
6
Risk factors for hospital-acquired and community-acquired pressure injuries: a multicentre mixed case-control study.医院获得性和社区获得性压力性损伤的危险因素:一项多中心混合病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 18;12(4):e057624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057624.
7
All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.并非所有高危患者都一样:分析布雷登压疮风险评分以识别特定风险。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):282-91. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182435715.
8
Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries in the Acute Care Setting.社区获得性压疮在急性护理环境中的发生情况。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Mar 1;34(3):1-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000732748.56041.cf.
9
Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients.中等范围的Braden量表子量表评分与重症监护患者发生压疮的风险增加相关。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):420-428. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000349.
10
Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.压疮风险评估:葡萄牙成年住院患者Braden量表评分的回顾性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov;24(21-22):3165-76. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12927. Epub 2015 Aug 27.