Kearney Emma, Greenald David, Matilionyte Gabriele, Lane Sheila, Tharmalingam Melissa D, Davies Jill, Stukenborg Jan-Bernd, Forsyth Grace, Mitchell Rod T
Reprod Fertil. 2025 Feb 7;6(1). doi: 10.1530/RAF-24-0116. Print 2025 Jan 1.
Methods to quantify germ cell number in human immature testicular tissues are essential to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy exposures and to optimise cryopreservation protocols used in fertility preservation for prepubertal boys. Established quantification methods rely on the presence of round tubules within the tissue. However, round tubular cross sections are limited in human prepubertal testicular tissues, especially when using in vitro culture. We aimed to assess whether an alternative method of germ cell quantification would provide similar results to recently established methods, without the requirement for round tubules. Human testicular samples included fetal tissue (exposed in vitro to cisplatin, carboplatin or control) or prepubertal tissue (fresh, cryopreserved, fresh in vitro cultured or cryopreserved in vitro cultured). Immunofluorescence assessed AP2γ (gonocytes) and MAGE-A4 ((pre)spermatogonia) expression. Germ cells were quantified by tubular germ cell density (Method 1), which was compared to methods that require round tubules, including spermatogonial number per round tubular cross section (S/T) (Method 2), fertility index (Method 3) and round tubular germ cell density (Method 4). A correlation analysis between methods was performed. Method 1 is strongly and significantly correlated with Method 2 (r = 0.838, P < 0.0001; r = 0.833, P < 0.0001), Method 3 (r = 0.752, P < 0.001; r = 0.802, P < 0.0001) and Method 4 (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.914, P < 0.0001) for fetal and prepubertal tissues, respectively. Given that Method 1 assess tubules irrespective of shape, it may increase the total number of germ cells available for quantification, validating its use for quantification of human testicular tissue samples where the amount of tissue or presence of round tubules is limited.
Chemotherapy can damage cells in the testicles that are required to make sperm, often leading to infertility in males. While options to preserve fertility in adult males are available, there are no established methods for young boys. To investigate how chemotherapy damages these cells and to explore approaches to preserve fertility, we require methods to count the number of cells that can develop into sperm. Existing counting methods involve only counting some of the cells in the tissue, but in young boys, it is often necessary to count all of the cells because the amount of tissue is limited. To overcome this, we counted cells in small pieces of human fetal and prepubertal testicles using an alternative method, which allows all cells to be counted. We found similar results using our method compared to three existing methods, making our method useful for counting cells in fetal and prepubertal testicle samples.
量化人类未成熟睾丸组织中生殖细胞数量的方法对于评估化疗暴露的影响以及优化青春期前男孩生育力保存中使用的冷冻保存方案至关重要。既定的量化方法依赖于组织中圆形小管的存在。然而,圆形管状横截面在人类青春期前睾丸组织中有限,尤其是在使用体外培养时。我们旨在评估一种替代的生殖细胞量化方法是否能提供与最近建立的方法相似的结果,而无需圆形小管。人类睾丸样本包括胎儿组织(体外暴露于顺铂、卡铂或对照)或青春期前组织(新鲜、冷冻保存、新鲜体外培养或冷冻保存体外培养)。免疫荧光评估AP2γ(生殖母细胞)和MAGE - A4(前精原细胞)表达。通过管状生殖细胞密度(方法1)对生殖细胞进行量化,并与需要圆形小管的方法进行比较,包括每个圆形管状横截面的精原细胞数量(S/T)(方法2)、生育指数(方法3)和圆形管状生殖细胞密度(方法4)。对各方法之间进行相关性分析。方法1与方法2(胎儿组织中r = 0.838,P < 0.0001;青春期前组织中r = 0.833,P < 0.0001)、方法3(胎儿组织中r = 0.752,P < 0.001;青春期前组织中r = 0.802,P < 0.0001)和方法4(胎儿组织中r = 0.863,P < 0.0001;青春期前组织中r = 0.914,P < 0.0001)分别具有强且显著的相关性。鉴于方法1评估小管时不考虑其形状,它可能会增加可用于量化的生殖细胞总数,从而验证了其在组织量或圆形小管存在受限的人类睾丸组织样本量化中的应用。
化疗会损害睾丸中产生精子所需的细胞,常导致男性不育。虽然成年男性有生育力保存的选择,但对于年幼男孩尚无既定方法。为了研究化疗如何损害这些细胞并探索生育力保存方法,我们需要能够计数可发育成精子的细胞数量的方法。现有的计数方法仅涉及对组织中的部分细胞进行计数,但对于年幼男孩,由于组织量有限,通常需要对所有细胞进行计数。为克服这一问题,我们使用一种替代方法对人类胎儿和青春期前小块睾丸组织中的细胞进行计数,该方法可对所有细胞进行计数。与三种现有方法相比,我们的方法得到了相似的结果,这使得我们的方法可用于对胎儿和青春期前睾丸样本中的细胞进行计数。