Hong Zhenghua, Su Yongwei, Zhang Liwei, Luo Hua
Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated with Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Apr 2;107(7):760-770. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00946. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
Joint arthroplasty effectively treats osteoarthritis, providing pain relief and improving function, but postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a common complication. This study therefore assessed the effectiveness and safety of aspirin compared with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for VTE prophylaxis after joint arthroplasty.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to May 14, 2024, that compared the effect of aspirin versus OACs on VTE prophylaxis in adults undergoing joint arthroplasty. Data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers conducted the literature searches and data extraction. A random-effects model was used to estimate effects. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE); secondary outcomes included bleeding, wound complications, and mortality.
The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 4,717 participants (55.1% female) from several continents. The relative risk (RR) of VTE following joint arthroplasty was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.32) for aspirin compared with OACs. Similar results were observed for DVT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.40) and PE (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.71). There were no significant differences in the risks of bleeding, wound complications, or mortality between patients receiving aspirin and those receiving OACs. Subgroup analyses considering factors such as study region, type of joint surgery, type of VTE detection, year of publication, use of mechanical VTE prophylaxis, aspirin dose, type of OAC comparator, study quality, and funding also found no significant differences in VTE incidence between aspirin and OACs. The overall quality of evidence for VTE and DVT outcomes was high.
Based on high-quality evidence from RCTs, aspirin is as effective and safe as OACs in preventing VTE, including DVT and PE, after joint arthroplasty, without increasing complications.
Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
关节置换术能有效治疗骨关节炎,缓解疼痛并改善功能,但术后静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)仍是常见并发症。因此,本研究评估了阿司匹林与口服抗凝剂(OACs)相比在关节置换术后预防VTE的有效性和安全性。
通过检索PubMed、Embase、科学网和Cochrane图书馆,对截至2024年5月14日的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较阿司匹林与OACs对接受关节置换术的成年人预防VTE的效果。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南。两名独立研究人员进行文献检索和数据提取。采用随机效应模型估计效应。主要结局是VTE的发生率,包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE);次要结局包括出血、伤口并发症和死亡率。
荟萃分析纳入了11项RCTs,共4717名来自各大洲的参与者(55.1%为女性)。与OACs相比,关节置换术后阿司匹林组VTE的相对风险(RR)为1.11(95%置信区间[CI],0.93至1.32)。DVT(RR,1.12;95%CI,0.90至1.40)和PE(RR,1.18;95%CI,0.51至2.71)也观察到类似结果。接受阿司匹林治疗的患者与接受OACs治疗的患者在出血、伤口并发症或死亡率风险方面无显著差异。考虑研究地区、关节手术类型、VTE检测类型、发表年份、机械性VTE预防措施的使用、阿司匹林剂量、OAC比较剂类型、研究质量和资金等因素的亚组分析也发现,阿司匹林和OACs在VTE发生率方面无显著差异。VTE和DVT结局的总体证据质量较高。
基于RCTs的高质量证据,阿司匹林在预防关节置换术后包括DVT和PE在内的VTE方面与OACs一样有效和安全,且不会增加并发症。
治疗水平I。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。