Suzuki Yasutomo, Hodotsuka Naoto, Kuribayashi Eigo, Suzuki Kyota, Honda Yuichiro, Endo Shuma, Kondo Yukihiro
Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School, Chiba, Japan.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2025 Jan;17(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/luts.70003.
In our institution, a unique sling technique is performed for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. However, in cases of severe urinary incontinence or in the medium to long term, the therapeutic effect may be insufficient. Therefore, a urethral sling technique that provides stronger compression of the bulbar urethra was developed, and its effectiveness was compared with the conventional technique.
Seventeen cases of conventional sling surgery and 16 cases of improved sling surgery were included. The number of pads used per day, safety pad rate, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) were evaluated before and after surgery, and a retrospective comparison was made between the two groups. Furthermore, patients were divided into those who used ≤ 4 pads per day before surgery and those who used ≥ 5 pads per day, and the difference between the two groups was examined. We also examined changes over time between groups.
Compared with the conventional group, the improved group showed significant improvement in the number of pads per day, safety pad rate, and ICIQ-SF 18 months after surgery. In the group with ≤ 4 preoperative pads, the improved group showed significant improvement in all safety pad rates except at 1 and 12 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in all items between the two groups when the number of preoperative pads was ≥ 5.
The improved urethral sling technique appeared to contribute to improving moderate urinary incontinence by adding a simple procedure, especially for patients using ≤ 4 pads per day.
在我们机构,针对根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁采用了一种独特的吊带技术。然而,对于严重尿失禁病例或中长期情况,治疗效果可能不足。因此,开发了一种能对球部尿道提供更强压迫的尿道吊带技术,并将其有效性与传统技术进行比较。
纳入17例传统吊带手术病例和16例改良吊带手术病例。评估手术前后每天使用的尿垫数量、安全尿垫率以及国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-SF),并对两组进行回顾性比较。此外,将患者分为术前每天使用≤4个尿垫的患者和术前每天使用≥5个尿垫的患者,检查两组之间的差异。我们还研究了两组随时间的变化情况。
与传统组相比,改良组在术后18个月时每天使用的尿垫数量、安全尿垫率和ICIQ-SF方面有显著改善。在术前尿垫数量≤4个的组中,改良组在术后1个月和12个月除外的所有安全尿垫率方面均有显著改善。当术前尿垫数量≥5个时,两组在所有项目上均无显著差异。
改良尿道吊带技术似乎通过增加一个简单步骤有助于改善中度尿失禁,特别是对于每天使用≤4个尿垫的患者。