Kerola Anne M, Pietikäinen Annukka, Barantseva Julia, Pajander Annaleena, Hänninen Arno
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Internal Medicine, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Päijät-Häme, Lahti, Finland.
RMD Open. 2025 Jan 20;11(1):e005007. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005007.
We assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of 17 myositis antibodies for having a diagnosis of myositis and other myositis-spectrum conditions (interstitial lung disease (ILD), connective tissue diseases (CTD), malignancy) and evaluated the impact of semiquantitative classification and antibody overlap on the PPVs.
We retrospectively identified 1068 individuals ≥18 years who tested positive for ≥1 antibody in the EUROLINE myositis line blot assay or positive for anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) in an ELISA-based test between 2015 and 2020 in 15 out of the 20 hospital districts in Finland. We extracted clinical diagnoses from the Care Register for Health Care between January 2013 and June 2022.
The PPV for a myositis diagnosis (ever during data collection) was highest for anti-HMGCR antibodies (94%), followed by anti-MDA5, anti-Jo-1 and anti-TIF1-γ (49-54%). Regarding other myositis antibodies, 18-42% of cases had myositis. Anti-synthetase antibodies, anti-MDA5, anti-PM-Scl100, anti-SAE1 and anti-Ro52 had a PPV for ILD of 25-47%. A PPV for CTD was highest for anti-Ro52 (57%). The PPV for malignancy was highest for anti-TIF1-γ (38%), followed by anti-PL-7 (32%). Stronger antibody band intensity was associated with higher PPVs for myositis and CTD but not for ILD or malignancies. Simultaneous positivity for ≥2 antibodies compared with single antibody was associated with higher PPVs for myositis, CTD and ILD.
The PPV of myositis antibodies for diagnoses of myositis or other myositis spectrum diseases vary considerably between individual autoantibodies. Higher PPVs can be expected with stronger band intensities and with the presence of ≥2 overlapping myositis antibodies.
我们评估了17种肌炎抗体对诊断肌炎及其他肌炎谱系疾病(间质性肺病(ILD)、结缔组织病(CTD)、恶性肿瘤)的阳性预测值(PPV),并评估了半定量分类和抗体重叠对PPV的影响。
我们回顾性纳入了2015年至2020年期间芬兰20个医院区中15个区年龄≥18岁、在EUROLINE肌炎免疫印迹试验中至少一种抗体检测呈阳性或基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测抗3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶(HMGCR)呈阳性的1068例个体。我们从2013年1月至2022年6月的医疗保健护理登记册中提取临床诊断信息。
抗HMGCR抗体诊断肌炎(在数据收集期间的任何时间)的PPV最高(94%),其次是抗MDA5、抗Jo-1和抗TIF1-γ(49%-54%)。对于其他肌炎抗体,18%-42%的病例患有肌炎。抗合成酶抗体、抗MDA5、抗PM-Scl100、抗SAE1和抗Ro52诊断ILD的PPV为25%-47%。抗Ro52诊断CTD的PPV最高(57%)。抗TIF1-γ诊断恶性肿瘤的PPV最高(38%),其次是抗PL-7(32%)。更强的抗体条带强度与肌炎和CTD的更高PPV相关,但与ILD或恶性肿瘤无关。与单一抗体相比,同时出现≥2种抗体阳性与肌炎、CTD和ILD的更高PPV相关。
肌炎抗体对肌炎或其他肌炎谱系疾病诊断的PPV在个体自身抗体之间差异很大。条带强度越强以及存在≥2种重叠的肌炎抗体时,可预期有更高的PPV。