Ripoll Thomas, Vieira Thais Dutra, Saoudi Samy, Marris Victor, Nicolle Romain, Noguero Antoine, Marot Vincent, Berard Emilie, Cavaignac Etienne
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Centre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jan 20;13(1):23259671241298924. doi: 10.1177/23259671241298924. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Additional anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has been associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced failure rates in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Despite the excellent clinical results reported, there is still a heated debate about its indications. Currently, the indications are mainly based on the patient's clinical criteria and not the imaging diagnosis of the injury of this ligament.
To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction and combined ACL and ALL reconstruction conditioned to intraoperative ultrasound-guided diagnosis of the ALL lesion.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between January 2017 and January 2022 were included. Patients were excluded if they had a previous history of ipsilateral knee surgery or if they underwent other concomitant procedures, including multiligament reconstruction surgery or osteotomy. The decision to perform an ALL reconstruction in addition to isolated ACL reconstruction was based on ultrasound diagnosis of this lesion. At the end of the study period, further knee injury and any other reoperations or complications were recorded and compared between patients who had isolated ACL reconstruction (no-ALLR group) and combined ACL and ALL. Propensity score matching was performed between groups. A multivariable analysis using the penalized Cox model was performed to explore the relationship between the graft rupture, surgical procedure type, and potential explanatory variables.
A total of 339 patients met the predefined eligibility criteria; 146 ACL reconstructions were performed in an isolated manner (no-ALLR group) and 193 were combined with ALL (ALLR group). After matching, 130 patients were allocated to each group. The mean follow-up was 36.7 months. The overall graft failure rate was 4.6% (6.9% in the no-ALLR group and 2.3% in the ALLR group; = .076). The adjusted Cox regression showed that graft failure rate was nonsignificantly different between the groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.096-1.364]; = .133). Younger age (≤20 years) was associated with graft failure (adjusted HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.121-0.719]; = .007).
Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction conditioned to intraoperative ultrasound-guided diagnosis of the ALL lesion has an equivalent ACL graft failure rate to isolated ACL. Intraoperative ultrasound diagnosis of an ALL injury may be an indication for the addition of an ALL reconstruction.
在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中,额外进行前外侧韧带(ALL)重建与改善临床疗效及降低失败率相关。尽管已有出色的临床结果报道,但关于其适应证仍存在激烈争论。目前,适应证主要基于患者的临床标准,而非该韧带损伤的影像学诊断。
比较在术中超声引导下诊断ALL损伤的情况下,单纯ACL重建患者与ACL联合ALL重建患者的临床疗效。
队列研究;证据等级为3级。
对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。纳入2017年1月至2022年1月期间接受初次ACL重建的患者。若患者有同侧膝关节手术史或接受了其他同期手术,包括多韧带重建手术或截骨术,则将其排除。除单纯ACL重建外决定进行ALL重建基于该损伤的超声诊断。在研究期末,记录并比较单纯ACL重建患者(非ALLR组)和ACL联合ALL重建患者的进一步膝关节损伤及任何其他再次手术或并发症情况。两组间进行倾向评分匹配。使用惩罚Cox模型进行多变量分析,以探讨移植物破裂、手术方式类型和潜在解释变量之间的关系。
共有339例患者符合预设的纳入标准;146例进行了单纯ACL重建(非ALLR组),193例进行了ACL联合ALL重建(ALLR组)。匹配后,每组分配130例患者。平均随访36.7个月。总体移植物失败率为4.6%(非ALLR组为6.9%,ALLR组为2.3%;P = 0.076)。校正后的Cox回归显示两组间移植物失败率无显著差异(校正风险比[HR],0.36[95%可信区间,0.096 - 1.364];P = 0.133)。年龄较小(≤20岁)与移植物失败相关(校正HR,0.29[95%可信区间,0.121 - 0.719];P = 0.007)。
在术中超声引导下诊断ALL损伤的情况下,ACL联合ALL重建与单纯ACL重建的ACL移植物失败率相当。术中超声诊断ALL损伤可能是增加ALL重建的一个适应证。