Mahler Christoph F, Friedl Felix, Nusshag Christian, Speer Claudius, Benning Louise, Göth Daniel, Schaier Matthias, Sommerer Claudia, Mieth Markus, Mehrabi Arianeb, Michalski Christoph, Renders Lutz, Bachmann Quirin, Heemann Uwe, Krautter Markus, Schwenger Vedat, Echterdiek Fabian, Zeier Martin, Morath Christian, Kälble Florian
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1511368. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1511368. eCollection 2024.
In the face of growing transplant waitlists and aging donors, sound pre-transplant evaluation of organ offers is paramount. However, many transplant centres lack clear criteria on organ acceptance. Often, previous scores for donor characterisation have not been validated for the Eurotransplant population and are not established to support graft acceptance decisions. Here, we investigated 1353 kidney transplantations at three different German centres to develop and validate novel statistical models for the prediction of early adverse graft outcome (EAO), defined as graft loss or CKD ≥4 within three months. The predictive models use generalised estimating equations (GEE) accounting for potential correlations between paired grafts from the same donor. Discriminative accuracy and calibration were determined via internal and external validation in the development (935 recipients, 309 events) and validation cohort (418 recipients, 162 events) respectively. The expert model is based on predictor ratings by senior transplant nephrologists, while for the data-driven model variables were selected via high-dimensional lasso generalised estimating equations (LassoGee). Both models show moderate discrimination for EAO (C-statistic expert model: 0,699, data-driven model 0,698) with good calibration. In summary, we developed novel statistical models that represent current clinical consensus and are tailored to the older deceased donor population. Compared to KDRI, our described models are sparse with only four and three predictors respectively and account for paired grafts from the same donor, while maintaining a discriminative accuracy equal or better than the established KDRI-score.
面对不断增长的移植等待名单和捐赠者老龄化问题,对器官供体进行合理的移植前评估至关重要。然而,许多移植中心在器官接受方面缺乏明确的标准。通常,先前用于供体特征描述的评分尚未在欧洲移植人群中得到验证,也未确立用于支持移植物接受决策。在此,我们调查了德国三个不同中心的1353例肾移植病例,以开发和验证用于预测早期移植不良结局(EAO)的新型统计模型,EAO定义为移植后三个月内移植物丢失或慢性肾脏病(CKD)≥4期。预测模型使用广义估计方程(GEE)来考虑来自同一供体的配对移植物之间的潜在相关性。分别通过在开发队列(935例受者,309例事件)和验证队列(418例受者,162例事件)中的内部和外部验证来确定判别准确性和校准情况。专家模型基于资深移植肾病学家的预测评分,而数据驱动模型则通过高维套索广义估计方程(LassoGee)选择变量。两个模型对EAO均显示出中等判别能力(C统计量:专家模型为0.699,数据驱动模型为0.698)且校准良好。总之,我们开发了代表当前临床共识且针对老年死亡供体人群量身定制的新型统计模型。与肾脏疾病风险指数(KDRI)相比,我们描述的模型更为精简,分别仅包含四个和三个预测因子,并考虑了来自同一供体的配对移植物,同时保持了与既定KDRI评分相当或更好的判别准确性。