Suppr超能文献

为什么单纯后交叉韧带断裂的患者在行走时没有主观膝关节不稳定感?一项生物力学研究。

Why do patients with isolated PCL rupture experience no subjective knee joint instability during walking? An biomechanical study.

作者信息

Lu Mingfeng, Chen Wei, Lin Jinpeng, Huang Wenhan, Gao Junqing, Zhao Lilian, Li Shilin, He Lilei, Zhang Yu

机构信息

The Eighth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan City, China.

Department of Sports Medicine, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 7;12:1495266. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1495266. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the kinematic changes in the knee joint during walking in patients with isolated PCL-deficiency (PCLD) to determine the presence of walking-related joint instability (mechanical instability-abnormal displacement form structural damage). Additionally, the study seeks to provide biomechanical insights into the observed differences between subjective and objective assessments.

METHODS

35 healthy volunteers and 27 patients with isolated PCLD (both involved and uninvolved sides) were included in the study. All participants walked on a treadmill at a self-selected comfortable speed. An optical 3D motion capture system was employed to collect six degrees of freedom kinematic data of the knee joint during walking. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) was employed, using independent and paired t-tests to evaluate differences between the healthy control group and the PCLD group, as well as between the involved and uninvolved sides, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with the healthy control group, posterior tibial displacement (the main indicator for anterior-posterior instability) of the involved limb was significantly decreased during 79%-94%. additionally, knee flexion angles of the involved limb were significantly increased compared with healthy control group during 0%-5% and 95%-99% of the gait cycle and significantly decreased during 66%-87%; In the uninvolved side, adaptive gait changes were observed, with knee flexion angles significantly reduced during 20%-50% and 64%-89% of the gait cycle and posterior tibial displacement significantly reduced during 60%-94% compared with the healthy control group; Compared to the uninvolved limb, the involved limb showed increased internal rotation during 62%-71% of the gait cycle and increased knee flexion during 8%-53%, with no significant differences in other dimensions.

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical perspective, patients with PCL rupture exhibit no joint instability during walking. Compared to the healthy control group, the involved leg shows a significant reduction in posterior tibial displacement and a diminished range of knee flexion. Clinical evaluations of PCLD should incorporate dynamic functional assessments, thereby providing a more comprehensive basis for treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估单纯后交叉韧带损伤(PCLD)患者行走时膝关节的运动学变化,以确定是否存在与行走相关的关节不稳定(机械性不稳定——由结构损伤导致的异常位移)。此外,该研究旨在为观察到的主观评估与客观评估之间的差异提供生物力学见解。

方法

本研究纳入了35名健康志愿者和27名单纯PCLD患者(患侧和健侧)。所有参与者在跑步机上以自我选择的舒适速度行走。采用光学三维运动捕捉系统收集行走过程中膝关节的六个自由度运动学数据。使用统计参数映射(SPM),分别采用独立样本t检验和配对t检验来评估健康对照组与PCLD组之间以及患侧与健侧之间的差异。

结果

与健康对照组相比,患侧肢体在79% - 94%的步态周期内,胫骨后移(前后不稳定的主要指标)显著降低。此外,患侧肢体在步态周期的0% - 5%和95% - 99%期间,膝关节屈曲角度与健康对照组相比显著增加,在66% - 87%期间显著降低;在健侧,观察到适应性步态变化,与健康对照组相比,在步态周期的20% - 50%和64% - 89%期间膝关节屈曲角度显著减小,在60% - 94%期间胫骨后移显著减小;与健侧肢体相比,患侧肢体在步态周期的62% - 71%期间内旋增加,在8% - 53%期间膝关节屈曲增加,在其他维度上无显著差异。

结论

从生物力学角度来看,PCL断裂患者在行走过程中不存在关节不稳定。与健康对照组相比,患侧腿的胫骨后移显著减少,膝关节屈曲范围减小。PCLD的临床评估应纳入动态功能评估,从而为治疗决策提供更全面的依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46a9/11747807/3109205bfc1a/fbioe-12-1495266-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验