• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕龄小于30周且患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿无创通气失败的危险因素。

Risk factors for noninvasive ventilation failure in preterm infants at less than 30 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Yazici Aybuke, Buyuktiryaki Mehmet, Sari Fatma Nur, Alyamac Dizdar Evrim

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, 06800, Turkey.

Division of Neonatology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, 34815, Turkey.

出版信息

J Trop Pediatr. 2024 Dec 5;71(1). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmae051.

DOI:10.1093/tropej/fmae051
PMID:39840596
Abstract

This study aimed to identify risk factors for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure in <30 weeks' gestation preterm neonates and compare morbidity in patients with and without NIV failure. This study included preterm neonates <30 weeks' gestation who received NIV support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between infants with and without NIV failure within the first 72 hours after birth. Of 443 preterm neonates, NIV failure occurred in 101 (22.8%). Of these, initial respiratory support was nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in 76 infants (75.2%) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in 25 infants (24.8%). Gestational age, birth weight, and antenatal steroid exposure were significantly lower in patients with NIV failure. Grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage, moderate/severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity requiring laser photocoagulation were significantly more common in the NIV failure group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that antenatal steroid therapy reduced NIV failure [odds ratio (OR): 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.94; P = .03], while nCPAP (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.53-4.48; P < .001), surfactant requirement (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.36-4.25; P = .003), and ≥2 doses of surfactant need (OR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.89-6.74; P < .001) were associated with greater NIV failure. The results of this study indicated that administering antenatal steroids and using NIPPV or BiPAP instead of nCPAP as initial respiratory support reduced the likelihood of NIV failure in preterm infants with RDS.

摘要

本研究旨在确定孕周<30周的早产新生儿无创通气(NIV)失败的危险因素,并比较NIV失败和未失败患者的发病率。本研究纳入了孕周<30周、因呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)接受NIV支持的早产新生儿。对出生后72小时内NIV失败和未失败的婴儿的人口统计学和临床特征进行了比较。在443例早产新生儿中,101例(22.8%)出现NIV失败。其中,76例(75.2%)婴儿最初的呼吸支持为鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP),25例(24.8%)婴儿为鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)或双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)。NIV失败患者的孕周、出生体重和产前类固醇暴露显著更低。NIV失败组中III-IV级脑室内出血、中度/重度支气管肺发育不良和需要激光光凝治疗的早产儿视网膜病变明显更常见。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,产前类固醇治疗可降低NIV失败的风险[比值比(OR):0.53,95%置信区间(CI):0.29-0.94;P = 0.03],而nCPAP(OR:2.61,95% CI:1.53-4.48;P < 0.001)、表面活性剂需求(OR:2.40,95% CI:1.36-4.25;P = 0.003)以及≥2剂表面活性剂需求(OR:3.57,95% CI:1.89-6.74;P < 0.001)与更高的NIV失败风险相关。本研究结果表明,给予产前类固醇,并使用NIPPV或BiPAP而非nCPAP作为初始呼吸支持,可降低RDS早产婴儿NIV失败的可能性。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for noninvasive ventilation failure in preterm infants at less than 30 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.孕龄小于30周且患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿无创通气失败的危险因素。
J Trop Pediatr. 2024 Dec 5;71(1). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmae051.
2
Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.以无创呼吸支持作为主要模式用于早产儿:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD014895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014895.pub2.
3
Comparative effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with RDS: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经鼻间歇正压通气与持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较效果:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 28;184(7):455. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06282-7.
4
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.早期经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与早期经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)用于早产儿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2.
5
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.拔管后早产儿使用鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.
6
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.用于早产儿呼吸暂停的经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD002272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002272.
7
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD002272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002272.
8
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.早期使用表面活性剂并进行短暂通气与选择性使用表面活性剂及持续机械通气用于患有或有呼吸窘迫综合征风险的早产儿的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub3.
9
Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.用于早产儿鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的设备和压力源。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD002977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002977.pub2.
10
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for RDS.对于患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)或有RDS风险的早产儿,早期给予表面活性剂并进行短暂通气与选择性给予表面活性剂及持续机械通气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.