Li Binglong, Li Xuezhou, Zheng Weibo, Wei Shusheng, Zhang Baoqing, Liu Jianwei, Chen Yongyuan, Wang Dan, Lu Qunshan, Liu Peilai
Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1095-1104. doi: 10.1111/os.14360. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is considered the standard of care for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the hospital setting. However, its widespread adoption after hospitalization has been limited due to its shortcomings in obstruction of venous valves and blood reflux. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of continuous graduated pneumatic compression (CGPC), a new device with a novel mechanism, and IPC on lower hemodynamics and the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing arthroplasty.
We randomized 123 participants undergoing knee arthroplasty to receive either IPC or CGPC from June 2022 through August 2023. An experienced sonographer used a Doppler ultrasound scanner to obtain hemodynamic indicators of venous blood. The primary outcome was the blood velocity of the femoral vein measured by a Doppler scanner. Secondary outcomes included the hemodynamic of the femoral vein and popliteal vein, quality of life at discharge and 30 days after surgery, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE up to 30 days, and adverse events related to the IPC and CGPC device. For statistical analyses, Student's t-test, analysis of covariance, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. Statistical significance was indicated with p < 0.05.
There was no significant difference in femoral vein velocity between the IPC and CGPC groups. However, CGPC demonstrated a significant increase in femoral vein flow compared to the IPC group, with a median (interquartile) increasing from 158.9 (122.9, 204.3) to 265.6 (203.3, 326.8) mL/min in the CGPC group and from 139.0 (103.3, 175.9) to 189.6 (161.4, 270.8) mL/min in the IPC group (p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed in popliteal vein measurements. The differences between the two groups were similar in terms of quality of life, incidence of VTE, and adverse events.
The CGPC device provides a substantial increase in blood flow compared to the IPC device. Its safety and effectiveness have been preliminarily validated. The CGPC device presents a promising alternative for VTE prophylaxis in arthroplasty.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300078201).
间歇性气动压迫(IPC)被认为是医院环境中预防静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的护理标准。然而,由于其在阻碍静脉瓣膜和血液反流方面的缺点,住院后其广泛应用受到限制。本研究的目的是比较连续渐进性气动压迫(CGPC)(一种具有新机制的新设备)和IPC对接受关节置换术患者下肢血流动力学及VTE发生率的影响。
我们将123例接受膝关节置换术的参与者随机分组,在2022年6月至2023年8月期间接受IPC或CGPC治疗。一位经验丰富的超声检查人员使用多普勒超声扫描仪获取静脉血的血流动力学指标。主要结局是用多普勒扫描仪测量的股静脉血流速度。次要结局包括股静脉和腘静脉的血流动力学、出院时及术后30天的生活质量、术后30天内有症状和无症状的VTE,以及与IPC和CGPC设备相关的不良事件。对于统计分析,使用了Student t检验、协方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验。p<0.05表示具有统计学意义。
IPC组和CGPC组的股静脉血流速度无显著差异。然而,与IPC组相比,CGPC组股静脉血流量显著增加,CGPC组的中位数(四分位间距)从158.9(122.9,204.3)增加到265.6(203.3,326.8)mL/分钟,IPC组从139.0(103.3,175.9)增加到189.6(161.4,270.8)mL/分钟(p<0.001)。在腘静脉测量中观察到类似趋势。两组在生活质量、VTE发生率和不良事件方面的差异相似。
与IPC设备相比,CGPC设备可显著增加血流量。其安全性和有效性已得到初步验证。CGPC设备是关节置换术中预防VTE的一个有前景的替代方案。
中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2300078201)