• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于舌侧托槽间接粘接的带有3D打印模型的部分封闭单硬真空成型托盘的转移精度:一项前瞻性体内研究。

Transfer accuracy of partially enclosed single hard vacuum-formed trays with 3D-printed models for lingual bracket indirect bonding: A prospective in-vivo study.

作者信息

Nguyen Viet Anh, Nguyen Thuy Anh, Doan Hong Le, Pham Thi Hanh, Doan Bich Ngoc, Pham Thi Thanh Thuy, Hoang Viet

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, PHENIKAA University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Private Practice, Viet Anh Orthodontic Clinic, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0316208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316208. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316208
PMID:39841636
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753703/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the clinical transfer accuracy of partially enclosed single hard vacuum-formed trays based on three-dimensional (3D) printed models for lingual bracket indirect bonding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients receiving lingual orthodontic treatment were enrolled. Digital models with ideal bracket positions were 3D-printed, followed by fabrication of partially enclosed single hard vacuum-formed trays. Digital impressions captured actual bracket positions and were compared to the ideal positions. One-tailed t-tests assessed if errors were within clinically acceptable thresholds of 0.5 mm for linear measurements and 2° for angular measurements.

RESULTS

Mean bracket transfer errors were 0.052 mm, 0.076 mm, 0.106 mm, 0.795°, 1.344°, and 2.485° for mesiodistal, buccolingual, occlusogingival, rotation, tip, and torque, respectively. Transfer errors were statistically below the clinically acceptable thresholds for all dimensions except torque. Frequencies of acceptable transfer errors were 100%, 100%, 99.3%, 93.1%, 78.3%, and 54.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Partially enclosed single hard vacuum-formed trays with 3D-printed models transfer lingual brackets with high accuracy in the mesiodistal, buccolingual, and occlusogingival dimensions, rotation, and tip. However, the transfer of torque remains questionable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估基于三维(3D)打印模型的部分封闭式单硬真空成型托盘用于舌侧托槽间接粘接的临床转移准确性。

材料与方法

连续纳入32例接受舌侧正畸治疗的患者。将具有理想托槽位置的数字模型进行3D打印,然后制作部分封闭式单硬真空成型托盘。通过数字印模获取实际托槽位置,并与理想位置进行比较。采用单尾t检验评估线性测量误差是否在临床可接受的0.5mm阈值内,角度测量误差是否在2°阈值内。

结果

近远中、颊舌向、牙合龈向、旋转、倾斜和转矩的平均托槽转移误差分别为0.052mm、0.076mm、0.106mm、0.795°、1.344°和2.485°。除转矩外,所有维度的转移误差在统计学上均低于临床可接受阈值。可接受转移误差的频率分别为100%、100%、99.3%、93.1%、78.3%和54.0%。

结论

基于3D打印模型的部分封闭式单硬真空成型托盘在近远中、颊舌向、牙合龈向维度、旋转和倾斜方面能高精度转移舌侧托槽。然而,转矩的转移仍存在疑问。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/2efe53044604/pone.0316208.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/245dd5ad7f1a/pone.0316208.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/fb80f43a6569/pone.0316208.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/2efe53044604/pone.0316208.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/245dd5ad7f1a/pone.0316208.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/fb80f43a6569/pone.0316208.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/499a/11753703/2efe53044604/pone.0316208.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Transfer accuracy of partially enclosed single hard vacuum-formed trays with 3D-printed models for lingual bracket indirect bonding: A prospective in-vivo study.用于舌侧托槽间接粘接的带有3D打印模型的部分封闭单硬真空成型托盘的转移精度:一项前瞻性体内研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0316208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316208. eCollection 2025.
2
Lingual bracket transfer accuracy of double vacuum-formed indirect bonding tray using 3D-printed model: an in vivo study.3D 打印模型制作的双层真空成型间接粘接托盘的托槽转移准确性:一项体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Mar;165(3):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
3
Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets.3D 打印托盘间接粘接正畸托槽的转移精度。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):372-379. doi: 10.2319/073021-596.1.
4
Comparison of the accuracy of two techniques for three-dimensional digital indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: A randomized controlled trial.两种三维数字化间接粘接正畸托槽技术准确性的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jul 8;29(3):e2423117. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e2423117.oar. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.两种数字化间接粘接托盘用于唇侧粘接托槽的转移精度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):67-73. doi: 10.2319/013120-70.1.
6
Linear and angular transfer accuracy of labial brackets using three dimensional-printed indirect bonding trays: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用三维打印间接粘结托盘的唇侧托槽的线性和角度转移精度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthod. 2022 Mar;20(1):100612. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100612. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.两种不同的三维打印转移托盘与硅橡胶转移托盘的托槽转移准确性比较。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):364-371. doi: 10.2319/040821-283.1.
8
Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.使用热塑型和 3D 打印间接粘接托盘的托槽定位准确性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Jun 4;24(2):133-145.
9
3D printed indirect bonding trays: Transfer accuracy of hard versus soft resin material in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study.3D 打印间接粘接托盘:前瞻性、随机、单盲临床研究中硬树脂与软树脂材料的转移精度比较。
Dent Mater. 2023 Nov;39(11):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
10
Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques.五种间接粘结技术的托槽转移精度的测量与比较
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):607-14. doi: 10.2319/070113-484.1. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
3D-printed indirect bonding trays and transfer jigs for lingual brackets: Digital workflows and two case reports.用于舌侧托槽的3D打印间接粘结托盘和转移夹具:数字化工作流程及两例病例报告。
Heliyon. 2024 May 28;10(11):e32035. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32035. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
2
Lingual bracket transfer accuracy of double vacuum-formed indirect bonding tray using 3D-printed model: an in vivo study.3D 打印模型制作的双层真空成型间接粘接托盘的托槽转移准确性:一项体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Mar;165(3):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
3
Accuracy of lingual straight-wire orthodontic treatment with passive self-ligating brackets and square slot: a retrospective study.
舌侧直丝弓矫治技术中被动自锁托槽和方丝槽的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Sep 18;24(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00482-3.
4
Accuracy of indirect bracket placement with medium-soft, transparent, broad-coverage transfer trays fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing: An in-vivo study.使用计算机辅助设计与制造技术制作的中软质、透明、全覆盖式转移托盘进行间接托槽定位的准确性:一项体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Jan;163(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.08.023. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Indirect bonding: an in-vitro comparison of a Polyjet printed versus a conventional silicone transfer tray.间接粘接:一种聚喷印打印与传统硅橡胶转移托盘的体外比较。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):728-737. doi: 10.2319/122021-925.1.
6
Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets.3D 打印托盘间接粘接正畸托槽的转移精度。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):372-379. doi: 10.2319/073021-596.1.
7
Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.两种不同的三维打印转移托盘与硅橡胶转移托盘的托槽转移准确性比较。
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 1;92(3):364-371. doi: 10.2319/040821-283.1.
8
Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.使用热塑型和 3D 打印间接粘接托盘的托槽定位准确性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Jun 4;24(2):133-145.
9
Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.两种数字化间接粘接托盘用于唇侧粘接托槽的转移精度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):67-73. doi: 10.2319/013120-70.1.
10
Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.间接粘接法重新定位托槽准确性的评估:硬质丙烯酸 CAD/CAM 与软单层硅橡胶托盘的比较,一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3889-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03256-x. Epub 2020 Mar 31.