• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AAPM TG282与Dance乳腺剂量测定模型的比较:对英国乳腺筛查计划平均乳腺腺体剂量估计值的影响

Comparison of AAPM TG282 and Dance breast dosimetry models: Impact on estimates of average MGD for the United Kingdom breast screening programmes.

作者信息

Loveland John, Mackenzie Alistair

机构信息

National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography (NCCPM), Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX UK.

National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography (NCCPM), Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX UK.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2025 Feb;130:104908. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908
PMID:39842322
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task group 282 (TG282) in collaboration with the European Federation for Organisations of Medical Physics (EFOMP) have developed a novel breast dosimetry model intended as a single international standard.

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of TG282 dosimetry on estimates of average Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programmes (BSP).

METHODS

MGDs were estimated, using the TG282 dosimetry model, for the most recent UK NHSBSP dose survey. This dataset included MGDs estimated using the Dance dosimetry model for 439,916 Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) exposures of 111,132 women and 10,831 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) exposures of 5,113 women. Direct comparisons of the two models were made and differences explored using this large-scale real world dataset.

RESULTS

TG282 model MGDs were on average approximately 20 % and 15 % lower than Dance model values for FFDM and DBT respectively. For the UK National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) breast thickness range of 50 mm to 60 mm inclusive differences were smaller at approximately 13 % and 10 % respectively. The difference between dosimetry models was shown to depend on the properties of the imaged population and X-ray equipment used. Average differences of up to 63.1 % were observed at higher CBT values for FFDM.

CONCLUSION

On average, the TG282 dosimetry model resulted in lower estimates for MGD in UK mammography. The differences were more pronounced for women with larger than average compressed breast thickness.

摘要

背景

美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)任务组282(TG282)与欧洲医学物理组织联合会(EFOMP)合作开发了一种新型乳腺剂量测定模型,旨在作为单一的国际标准。

目的

探讨TG282剂量测定法对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)乳腺筛查计划(BSP)中平均腺体剂量(MGD)估计值的影响。

方法

使用TG282剂量测定模型对英国NHSBSP最新剂量调查中的MGD进行估计。该数据集包括使用Dance剂量测定模型对111,132名女性的439,916次全视野数字乳腺摄影(FFDM)曝光以及5,113名女性的10,831次数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)曝光估计的MGD。使用这个大规模的真实世界数据集对两种模型进行直接比较,并探讨差异。

结果

TG282模型的MGD平均分别比FFDM和DBT的Dance模型值低约20%和15%。对于英国国家诊断参考水平(NDRL)中50毫米至60毫米(含)的乳腺厚度范围,差异较小,分别约为13%和10%。结果表明,剂量测定模型之间的差异取决于成像人群的特征和所使用的X射线设备。在FFDM的较高CBT值下,观察到平均差异高达63.1%。

结论

平均而言,TG282剂量测定模型导致英国乳腺摄影中MGD的估计值较低。对于乳腺压缩厚度大于平均水平的女性,差异更为明显。

相似文献

1
Comparison of AAPM TG282 and Dance breast dosimetry models: Impact on estimates of average MGD for the United Kingdom breast screening programmes.AAPM TG282与Dance乳腺剂量测定模型的比较:对英国乳腺筛查计划平均乳腺腺体剂量估计值的影响
Phys Med. 2025 Feb;130:104908. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104908. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023.2019-2023 年英国乳腺筛查项目中接受的辐射剂量。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Mar 28;97(1156):787-793. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqad039.
3
Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019.2016-2019 年英国乳腺筛查计划中的辐射剂量。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Jul 1;95(1135):20211400. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211400. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.数字乳腺断层合成中的剂量学特征及器官剂量评估:使用体素模型的测量与蒙特卡罗模拟
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3788-800. doi: 10.1118/1.4921362.
5
Digital Mammography, Tomosynthesis, and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Intraindividual Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose for Screening Examinations.数字化乳腺钼靶摄影、断层合成摄影及对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影:筛查检查中平均腺体剂量的个体内比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025 Mar;224(3):e2432150. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.32150. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
6
Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.基于均匀乳房模型的数字乳腺断层摄影系统的腺体剂量标准化系数。
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Mar 12;66(6):065024. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe2e9.
7
Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.数字化乳腺摄影和数字乳腺断层合成中的自动乳腺密度计算:对平均腺体剂量和乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)密度分类的影响
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jul;24(7):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与全数字化乳腺摄影的散射辐射比较。
Invest Radiol. 2015 Oct;50(10):679-85. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000168.
9
Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的放射剂量比较:单视图分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5024-4. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS WITH FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY.全数字化乳腺摄影系统、数字乳腺断层合成系统与对比增强乳腺磁共振成像系统的性能比较。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021 Dec 30;197(3-4):212-229. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncab172.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Dance and AAPM/EFOMP TG282 breast dosimetry methodologies for a screening population: Evaluation of model-based median breast density metrics.针对筛查人群的舞蹈与AAPM/EFOMP TG282乳腺剂量测定方法的比较:基于模型的中位数乳腺密度指标评估
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Oct;26(10):e70260. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70260.