Suppr超能文献

B细胞浸润可区分面部血管化复合组织异体移植中黏膜与皮肤的排斥模式。

B-cell infiltration distinguishes mucosal from skin patterns of rejection in facial vascularized composite allografts.

作者信息

Kauke-Navarro Martin, Crisler William J, Younis Nour, Khetani Radhika S, Sadigh Sam, Teague Jessica E, Ho Sui Shannan J, Ko Christine, Zhan Qian, Steuart Samuel, Treister Nathaniel S, Pober Jordan, Azzi Jamil, Clark Rachael A, Pomahac Bohdan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2025 Jun;25(6):1193-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Abstract

Rejection monitoring in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation traditionally focuses on skin biopsies. However, mucosal rejection frequently presents with more pronounced signs of immune activity. To explore mechanistic differences between skin and mucosal rejection, rejection and nonrejection biopsies from allograft skin and oral mucosa of 9 facial vascularized composite allotransplantation recipients were retrospectively analyzed using histology, multiplex immunostaining, and gene expression profiling, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells quantified via mass cytometry. Both skin and mucosa exhibited similar patterns of granzyme B expressing (GZMB) T cells, indicating T cell-mediated rejection in both tissues. However, mucosa demonstrated additional CD19 B cell infiltration and occasional plasma cells, which were absent in skin. These intramucosal B cells expressed AHNAK and CD43, suggesting they may be innate-like B cells (Bin cells). CD8/GZMB cells and B cell populations were enriched in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during combined skin and mucosal rejection but not isolated skin rejection. These findings suggest distinct rejection mechanisms in skin and mucosa, with mucosa uniquely involving B cells. Current skin-focused rejection monitoring may overlook important mucosal rejection events, emphasizing the need to monitor both tissues concurrently. Mucosal biopsies could improve the accuracy in detecting acute rejection.

摘要

面部血管化复合组织异体移植中的排斥反应监测传统上集中于皮肤活检。然而,黏膜排斥反应常常表现出更明显的免疫活动迹象。为了探究皮肤和黏膜排斥反应之间的机制差异,我们对9名面部血管化复合组织异体移植受者的同种异体移植皮肤和口腔黏膜的排斥及非排斥活检样本进行了回顾性分析,采用了组织学、多重免疫染色和基因表达谱分析方法,并通过质谱流式细胞术对外周血单个核细胞进行定量分析。皮肤和黏膜均表现出相似的颗粒酶B表达(GZMB)T细胞模式,表明两种组织中均存在T细胞介导的排斥反应。然而,黏膜显示出额外的CD19 B细胞浸润和偶尔出现的浆细胞,而皮肤中则没有。这些黏膜内B细胞表达AHNAK和CD43,表明它们可能是类天然B细胞(Bin细胞)。在皮肤和黏膜联合排斥反应期间,外周血单个核细胞中的CD8/GZMB细胞和B细胞群体增多,但在单独的皮肤排斥反应中则没有。这些发现表明皮肤和黏膜存在不同的排斥机制,黏膜独特地涉及B细胞。目前以皮肤为重点的排斥反应监测可能会忽略重要的黏膜排斥事件,强调了同时监测两种组织的必要性。黏膜活检可以提高检测急性排斥反应的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验