• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募和留住少数族裔参与者的文化谦逊策略:一项范围综述方案

Cultural humility strategies for recruitment and retention of minoritised participants: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Chehade Mireille, McLean Kellie, Ashmawi Samar Mohsen, Fernandez Cajavilca Moroni, Phung Baomi T, Clark-Cutaia Maya N, Campbell Rice Brynne

机构信息

PhD Program, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA

Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University Steinhardt School of Culture Education and Human Development, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e087916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087916.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087916
PMID:39842918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11784376/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cultural humility practices are shown to be effective when working with diverse populations in healthcare settings. Research recruitment and retention among minoritised groups are essential to address health inequities. Given the successful application to healthcare settings, cultural humility practices may hold promise for recruiting and retaining minoritised individuals. However, little is known about how these practices may be applied to health research. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent to which cultural humility practices are applied to health research and how they may be leveraged to optimise recruitment and retention among minoritised populations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid) and Web of Science Core Collection. Literature from 1993 to 2024 that captures the concept of cultural humility in health research with racial and ethnic or gender and sexual minoritised populations in the USA will be considered. The identified pool of records will be imported to Covidence, an online data management software. At the first screening stage, two independent reviewers will screen for title and abstract relevance. A third reviewer will be recruited to resolve discrepancies, if any. Records achieving consensus will have their full texts screened against the eligibility criteria and included in the final pool. Two tables will be developed to guide the data extraction process. The tabular format will be piloted and agreed on by all research team members. Descriptive content analysis will outline the operationalisation of cultural humility and identify strategies found effective in improving the representation of minoritised populations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required in line with the scoping review methodology. Dissemination of the findings mapping the cultural humility strategies found effective in health research will be conducted through a peer-reviewed publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/vra7h.

摘要

引言

在医疗环境中与不同人群合作时,文化谦逊实践已被证明是有效的。在少数群体中进行研究招募和保留对于解决健康不平等问题至关重要。鉴于文化谦逊实践在医疗环境中的成功应用,它可能对招募和保留少数群体个体具有前景。然而,对于这些实践如何应用于健康研究知之甚少。本范围综述的目的是了解文化谦逊实践在健康研究中的应用程度,以及如何利用它们来优化少数群体的招募和保留。

方法与分析

本范围综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围综述方法。将检索的数据库包括Medline(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、EMBASE(Ovid)、PsycINFO(Ovid)和科学引文索引核心合集。将考虑1993年至2024年期间涉及美国种族和族裔或性别及性少数群体在健康研究中文化谦逊概念的文献。识别出的记录池将导入到在线数据管理软件Covidence中。在第一个筛选阶段,两名独立评审员将筛选标题和摘要的相关性。如有差异,将招募第三名评审员来解决。达成共识的记录将根据纳入标准对其全文进行筛选,并纳入最终记录池。将制定两个表格来指导数据提取过程。表格格式将由所有研究团队成员进行预试验并达成一致。描述性内容分析将概述文化谦逊的实施,并确定在改善少数群体代表性方面有效的策略。

伦理与传播

根据范围综述方法,无需伦理批准。通过同行评审出版物传播在健康研究中发现有效的文化谦逊策略的研究结果。

试验注册号

开放科学框架https://osf.io/vra7h 。

相似文献

1
Cultural humility strategies for recruitment and retention of minoritised participants: a scoping review protocol.招募和留住少数族裔参与者的文化谦逊策略:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e087916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087916.
2
Hospital at home digital twin for the management of patients with frailty: a scoping review protocol.用于虚弱患者管理的居家医院数字孪生:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e093418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093418.
3
Screening for depression among Spanish-speaking patients in primary care settings within the USA: a scoping review protocol to inform clinical practices.在美国初级保健机构中对说西班牙语的患者进行抑郁症筛查:一项为临床实践提供信息的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e092378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092378.
4
How Labeling of Commercial Baby Foods Impacts Parents' Beliefs About Sugar Content and Related Purchasing and Feeding Decisions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.商业婴儿食品标签如何影响父母对糖分含量的看法以及相关购买和喂养决策:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 19;14:e70135. doi: 10.2196/70135.
5
Clinical Nurse Educators' Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.临床护士教育工作者的工作满意度与离职意向:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 20;14:e66712. doi: 10.2196/66712.
6
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review.让认知障碍老年人参与数字健康技术:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 3;14:e65515. doi: 10.2196/65515.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical mistrust as a barrier to HIV prevention and care.医学不信任是艾滋病毒预防和护理的障碍。
J Behav Med. 2023 Dec;46(6):897-911. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00417-7. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Medical Mistrust Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of Sexual Minority Men.少数族裔和种族多样化的男同性恋群体中的医疗不信任现象。
LGBT Health. 2023 Aug-Sep;10(6):471-479. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0252. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
The power of community-based participatory research (CBPR).基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)的力量。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2024 Mar;47(1):2-8. doi: 10.1037/prj0000568. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
The Challenge of Recruiting Diverse Populations into Health Research: An embedded social science perspective.将不同人群纳入健康研究的挑战:一种嵌入式社会科学视角。
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(3):216-226. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2022.2115349. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Targeted Strategies for Recruitment and Engagement of Latinx Immigrants in Longitudinal Biobehavioral Research.以目标为导向的策略招募和参与拉丁裔移民参与纵向生物行为研究。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2023 Jun;21(2):68-77. doi: 10.1177/15404153221083659. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity.卫生公正研究:将全球卫生研究与健康公平联系起来的伦理框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002921.
7
Rethinking Cultural Competence: Shifting to Cultural Humility.重新思考文化能力:转向文化谦逊。
Health Serv Insights. 2020 Dec 20;13:1178632920970580. doi: 10.1177/1178632920970580. eCollection 2020.
8
Minority Representation in Clinical Trials in the United States: Trends Over the Past 25 Years.美国临床试验中的少数族裔代表性:过去25年的趋势
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jan;96(1):264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.027.
9
An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent.在试验中代表性不足和服务不足的人群:纳入无能力同意成年人的方法学、结构和系统障碍。
Trials. 2020 May 29;21(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04406-y.
10
Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials.研究和临床专业人员中的偏见和刻板印象:肿瘤学临床试验中少数民族招募的观点。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1958-1968. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32755. Epub 2020 Mar 9.