Mohammad Azmi Nabil, Nadzira Anith, Abdul Rahman Nur Afdzillah, Mohd Azman Zairul Azwan, Chandrakanthan Soma Balaganapati, Dualim Diana Melissa, Sagap Ismail
Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Surgery, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
World J Surg. 2025 Mar;49(3):576-583. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12490. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Aims conventional bowel preparation restricts dietary intake up to 72 h prior to colonoscopy. Bowel preparation process is often perceived as unpleasant leading to poor compliance and subsequent poor bowel preparation. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy of low-residue semi-elemental enteral formula (LREF) incorporated diet versus the standard diet in polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel preparation in the aim of creating a more tolerable bowel preparation regimen without compromising bowel cleanliness.
This was a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The noninferiority margin was set at 15%. One hundred sixty-seven patients were recruited and randomized to either the LREF group or the standard diet (SD) group using a 3L PEG preparation regimen.
The LREF group results in comparable satisfactory preparation rating to the standard diet group with a mean BPPS score of 6.87 (SD 1.59) versus 7.14 (SD 1.54) (95% CI[-0.86; 0.32] and p = 0.367). The mean difference (MD) of the BBPS total score between the two groups was -0.27 (95% CI [-0.764 and 0.224]). Equivalence were demonstrated using the two one-sided test (alpha = 5%) with the lower t-value of 2.682 (p = 0.0042) and the upper t-value of -4.493 (p < 0.01). There was also no significant difference in PEG compliance, willingness to repeat the procedure and tolerance to the bowel preparation between the two groups.
The LREF incorporated diet is equivalent to regimen in achieving satisfactory bowel cleanliness in patients undergoing PEG-based bowel preparation. We suggest that a LREF incorporated regimen for bowel preparation can be considered in patients who are unable to sustain prolonged fasting to improve the procedural experience.
传统的肠道准备要求在结肠镜检查前72小时限制饮食摄入。肠道准备过程通常被认为不愉快,导致依从性差,进而肠道准备不佳。本试验的目的是比较低残留半要素肠内营养配方(LREF)饮食与标准饮食在基于聚乙二醇(PEG)的肠道准备中的效果,以创建一种更易耐受的肠道准备方案,同时不影响肠道清洁度。
这是一项多中心、前瞻性、单盲、随机对照非劣效性试验。非劣效性界值设定为15%。招募了167名患者,采用3L PEG准备方案将其随机分为LREF组或标准饮食(SD)组。
LREF组的准备评分与标准饮食组相当,平均波士顿肠道准备评分(BPPS)为6.87(标准差1.59),而标准饮食组为7.14(标准差1.54)(95%置信区间[-0.86;0.32],p = 0.367)。两组间BPPS总分的平均差异(MD)为-0.27(95%置信区间[-0.764和0.224])。采用双侧检验(α = 5%)证明等效性,下限t值为2.682(p = 0.0042),上限t值为-4.493(p < )。两组在PEG依从性、重复该操作的意愿以及对肠道准备的耐受性方面也无显著差异。
在接受基于PEG的肠道准备的患者中,含LREF的饮食在实现满意的肠道清洁度方面与传统方案等效。我们建议,对于无法耐受长时间禁食的患者,可考虑采用含LREF的方案进行肠道准备,以改善操作体验。