Bai Jia Qi Adam, Manokaran Thulasie, Meldrum Levi, Tang Karen L
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1599-1608. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09340-2. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Early physician follow-up after hospital discharge is commonly recommended, though whether it mitigates adverse events is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between physician follow-up within 30 days of hospital discharge and risk of hospital readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, or mortality in medical patients.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2023. Inclusion criteria were original studies that reported association(s) between outpatient physician visit within 30 days of hospital discharge and at least one outcome of interest (emergency department visit, readmission, or mortality) for adult medical patients. Two investigators independently completed screening, extracted data, and assessed study quality using an adapted Down's and Black tool. Meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome using random effects models.
Sixty-six studies were included in the review. Early physician follow-up was significantly associated with reduced odds of hospital readmission (pooled OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58, 0.81], n=54) and mortality (pooled OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55, 0.90], n=21) but not emergency department visits (pooled OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59, 1.01], n=10). A majority of studies were at high risk of selection bias or residual confounding or both. When pooling only studies at low risk of bias in these domains or when only pooling randomized controlled trials, associations between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission were not statistically significant (pooled OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.93, 1.09], n=11; and 1.07 [95% CI 0.85, 1.36], n=5; respectively).
While meta-analysis suggests that early physician follow-up may be associated with reduced readmissions and mortality, there is a need to interpret these results with caution given that a majority of included studies were observational in nature and were at high risk of bias. It therefore remains unclear whether early physician follow-up is effective in reducing post-discharge adverse events of readmission, emergency department visits, and mortality.
PROSPERO CRD42022334467.
通常建议患者出院后尽早接受医生随访,但其是否能减轻不良事件尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究出院后30天内的医生随访与成年内科患者再次入院、急诊就诊或死亡风险之间的关联。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL电子数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年4月。纳入标准为报告出院后30天内门诊医生就诊与成年内科患者至少一项感兴趣结局(急诊就诊、再次入院或死亡)之间关联的原始研究。两名研究者独立完成筛选、提取数据,并使用改编后的唐斯和布莱克工具评估研究质量。对每个结局使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
该评价纳入了66项研究。早期医生随访与再次入院几率降低(合并比值比0.69 [95%置信区间0.58, 0.81],n = 54)和死亡率降低(合并比值比0.71 [95%置信区间0.55, 0.90],n = 21)显著相关,但与急诊就诊无关(合并比值比0.77 [95%置信区间0.59, 1.01],n = 10)。大多数研究存在选择偏倚或残余混杂或两者兼有的高风险。当仅汇总这些领域中偏倚风险低的研究时,或仅汇总随机对照试验时,早期医生随访与30天再次入院之间的关联无统计学意义(合并比值比分别为1.01 [95%置信区间0.93, 1.09],n = 11;以及1.07 [95%置信区间0.85, 1.36],n = 5)。
虽然荟萃分析表明早期医生随访可能与再次入院率和死亡率降低有关,但鉴于大多数纳入研究本质上是观察性的且存在高偏倚风险,因此需要谨慎解读这些结果。因此,早期医生随访是否能有效减少出院后再次入院、急诊就诊和死亡等不良事件仍不清楚。
PROSPERO CRD42022334467