Shibbani Kamel, Nigro John, Rao Rohit, Gordon Brent M, Justino Henri, AlShawabkeh Laith, El-Said Howaida
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatric, Stead Family Children's Hospital, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-03769-w.
Repair or palliation of pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) often falls into one of 4 categories: cardiac transplant, 2-ventricular circulation, 1.5 ventricle circulation, or single ventricle circulation. The optimal management strategy has been an area of much debate. We sought to review the management strategy of patients with PA/IVS at our institution to better understand what metrics can be used to guide management and initial interventions. The study aims to examine the outcomes of a single-center approach to managing patients with PA/IVS. Our cohort included 29 patients; one patient underwent a planned transplant at ten days of life (3.4%), 12 underwent repair via a two-ventricle circulation (41.4%), 7 underwent repair with 1.5 ventricle circulation (24.1%), and 7 underwent repair with single ventricle circulation (24.1%). Survival was achieved in 93.1% with two patients (6.9%) expiring. The TV annulus z-score was significantly different between the three groups, with the 1 V group having the smallest median TV annulus z-score at - 4.04 (IQR - 4.60- - 3.60) and the 2 V group having the largest median TV z-score at - 1.4 (IQR - 2.24- - 0.12). Six patients underwent late right ventricular decompression. We present a post-hoc algorithm to help guide treatment strategies for patients with PA/IVS.
室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁(PA/IVS)的修复或姑息治疗通常分为四类:心脏移植、双心室循环、1.5心室循环或单心室循环。最佳管理策略一直是一个备受争议的领域。我们试图回顾我院PA/IVS患者的管理策略,以更好地了解哪些指标可用于指导管理和初始干预。本研究旨在探讨单中心治疗PA/IVS患者的结果。我们的队列包括29例患者;1例患者在出生10天时接受了计划中的移植(3.4%),12例通过双心室循环进行修复(41.4%),7例通过1.5心室循环进行修复(24.1%),7例通过单心室循环进行修复(24.1%)。93.1%的患者存活,2例患者(6.9%)死亡。三组之间的三尖瓣环z评分有显著差异,单心室组的三尖瓣环z评分中位数最小,为-4.04(四分位间距-4.60--3.60),双心室组的三尖瓣z评分中位数最大,为-1.4(四分位间距-2.24--0.12)。6例患者接受了晚期右心室减压。我们提出了一种事后算法,以帮助指导PA/IVS患者的治疗策略。