• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续降雨条件下粉煤灰填埋场中污染物迁移的实验与模型分析

Experimental and modeled analysis of contaminant mobility in coal fly ash landfills under continuous rainfall regimes.

作者信息

Xu Shuyuan, Zhang Yongbo, Guo Jiangbo, Wu Aijing, Xiang Xinghua, Sun Haodong

机构信息

Department of Geology and Surveying Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Taiyuan, 030600, China.

Geological Environments and Disaster Prevention and Reduction Research Center, Shanxi Institute of Energy, Taiyuan, 030600, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86591-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86591-x
PMID:39843941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11754888/
Abstract

In China, a significant amount of coal fly ash is stored or used for landfill reclamation. The contaminants in coal fly ash (CFA) leachate can cause regional soil and groundwater contamination during long-term storage. This paper focuses on a coal gangue comprehensive utilisation power plant in Fenyang City, Shanxi Province, China, where the leaching characteristics of CFA were investigated by leaching tests. Laboratory-scale long-term soil column leaching tests and long-term ash column leaching tests were conducted using compacted soil and compacted CFA, respectively, to simulate contaminant migration patterns from CFA during the early and later stages of landfill operation. Hydrus-1D simulation software was used to calculate contaminant transport from the CFA landfill. The test results indicate that the concentrations of six representative elements or compounds in the CFA leachate exceeded the Groundwater Standard Class III. Among these contaminants, Pb contamination was the worst, with concentrations 26.67 times above the standard. The flow rate of the leachate is lower when the degree of compaction of the Ma'lan loess and the CFA is higher, and it takes longer for the leachate to start flowing. The greatest release of the ions occurred at a Ma'lan loess compaction coefficient of 0.943 and a hydraulic conductivity of 6.031 × 10. Under extreme rainfall conditions, the contaminants and heavy metals in the fly ash leachate migrate to a maximum depth of 56 cm in the compacted soil layer, with Pb reaching a depth of 28 cm, nickel 23 cm, cadmium 9 cm and hexavalent chromium 5 cm to meet Class III groundwater quality standards. These results indicate a potential risk of groundwater contamination in the vicinity of CFA deposits or land reclamation projects in long-term storage. To mitigate this risk, the Guofeng Power Plant may consider utilizing locally compacted Malan loess in combination with geosynthetic materials or implementing a liner much thicker than 1.5 m to enhance the impermeability of the fly ash landfill.

摘要

在中国,大量的粉煤灰被储存或用于填埋场复垦。粉煤灰渗滤液中的污染物在长期储存过程中会导致区域土壤和地下水污染。本文聚焦于中国山西省汾阳市的一座煤矸石综合利用发电厂,通过淋溶试验研究了粉煤灰的淋溶特性。分别使用压实土壤和压实粉煤灰进行了实验室规模的长期土壤柱淋溶试验和长期灰柱淋溶试验,以模拟填埋场运营早期和后期粉煤灰中污染物的迁移模式。利用Hydrus - 1D模拟软件计算粉煤灰填埋场中污染物的运移情况。试验结果表明,粉煤灰渗滤液中六种代表性元素或化合物的浓度超过了《地下水质量标准》Ⅲ类。在这些污染物中,铅污染最为严重,浓度超标26.67倍。当马兰黄土和粉煤灰的压实程度较高时,渗滤液的流速较低,渗滤液开始流动所需的时间更长。离子的最大释放量发生在马兰黄土压实系数为0.943、水力传导率为6.031×10时。在极端降雨条件下,粉煤灰渗滤液中的污染物和重金属在压实土层中的最大迁移深度为56厘米,铅达到28厘米深度,镍达到23厘米深度,镉达到9厘米深度,六价铬达到5厘米深度,以满足Ⅲ类地下水水质标准。这些结果表明,长期储存的粉煤灰堆场或土地复垦项目附近存在地下水污染的潜在风险。为降低这种风险,国峰电厂可考虑采用当地压实的马兰黄土并结合土工合成材料,或实施厚度远大于1.5米的衬层,以增强粉煤灰填埋场的防渗性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/4a6f2b814431/41598_2025_86591_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/14edac2afa81/41598_2025_86591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/b8e0c0e7f869/41598_2025_86591_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/f4dde04a21f3/41598_2025_86591_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/a81b38b82d5c/41598_2025_86591_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/9d34a4993ca8/41598_2025_86591_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/b52ea9038b28/41598_2025_86591_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/93b84309b9de/41598_2025_86591_Fig7a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/1dced2a8411f/41598_2025_86591_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/0bef6bcc36d0/41598_2025_86591_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/03fb072d1f6e/41598_2025_86591_Fig10a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/1987766198f2/41598_2025_86591_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/4a6f2b814431/41598_2025_86591_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/14edac2afa81/41598_2025_86591_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/b8e0c0e7f869/41598_2025_86591_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/f4dde04a21f3/41598_2025_86591_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/a81b38b82d5c/41598_2025_86591_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/9d34a4993ca8/41598_2025_86591_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/b52ea9038b28/41598_2025_86591_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/93b84309b9de/41598_2025_86591_Fig7a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/1dced2a8411f/41598_2025_86591_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/0bef6bcc36d0/41598_2025_86591_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/03fb072d1f6e/41598_2025_86591_Fig10a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/1987766198f2/41598_2025_86591_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e1/11754888/4a6f2b814431/41598_2025_86591_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental and modeled analysis of contaminant mobility in coal fly ash landfills under continuous rainfall regimes.连续降雨条件下粉煤灰填埋场中污染物迁移的实验与模型分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86591-x.
2
Long-term leaching of As, Cd, Mo, Pb, and Zn from coal fly ash in column test.从柱状试验中的煤灰中浸出砷、镉、钼、铅和锌的长期情况。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Sep 2;191(10):602. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7798-0.
3
Impact assessment of fly ash on ground water quality: An experimental study using batch leaching tests.粉煤灰对地下水质量的影响评估:使用批量浸出试验的实验研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2018 Jul;36(7):624-634. doi: 10.1177/0734242X18775484. Epub 2018 May 31.
4
Concentrations, Speciation, and Potential Release of Hazardous Heavy Metals from the Solid Combustion Residues of Coal-Fired Power Plants.燃煤电厂固体燃烧残余物中有害重金属的浓度、形态和潜在释放。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 2;19(19):12617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912617.
5
Release dynamics, risk evolution and driving mechanisms of heavy metals in superalkaline fly ash co-disposed by MSW landfill.超碱飞灰共处置垃圾填埋场中重金属的释放动力学、风险演变和驱动机制。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Sep 15;357:124410. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124410. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
6
Comparison of MSWI fly ash from grate-type and circulating fluidized bed incinerators under landfill leachate corrosion scenarios: the long-term leaching behavior and speciation of heavy metals.比较炉排炉和循环流化床焚烧炉在垃圾渗滤液腐蚀场景下的飞灰:重金属的长期浸出行为和形态。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(10):15057-15067. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16618-z. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
Environmental impact assessment of acidic coal gangue leaching solution on groundwater: a coal gangue pile in Shanxi, China.酸性煤矸石淋溶水对地下水的环境影响评价:以中国山西某煤矸石堆场为例
Environ Geochem Health. 2024 Mar 14;46(4):120. doi: 10.1007/s10653-024-01861-3.
8
A clay-coal fly ash based dual hydraulic-reactive liner for controlling acid mine drainage.基于黏土-煤矸石飞灰的双重水力反应衬垫控制酸性矿山排水。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2023 Jun 7;110(6):102. doi: 10.1007/s00128-023-03743-3.
9
Evaluation of the Bioavailability and Translocation of Selected Heavy Metals by and L for a South African Power Utility Coal Fly Ash.评估南非电力公用事业煤飞灰中 和 L 对选定重金属的生物利用度和迁移性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 13;15(12):2841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122841.
10
Research on leakage environmental risk assessment and risk prevention and control measures in the long-term landfill process of ultra-alkaline fly ash.关于超碱性粉煤灰在长期垃圾填埋过程中的渗漏环境风险评估及风险防控措施的研究。
Waste Manag. 2023 Dec 1;172:320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.10.022. Epub 2023 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of alternative materials that improve retention of potentially toxic metals in soil/clay liners in waste disposal areas.废物处置区中改善潜在毒性金属在土壤/粘土衬垫中保留的替代材料的系统评价。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Mar 25;196(4):394. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12546-w.
2
Analysis of enrichment, correlation, and leaching patterns of rare earth elements in coal fly ash assisted by statistical measures.基于统计方法的粉煤灰中稀土元素富集、相关性及淋滤模式分析
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166070. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166070. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Breakthrough times for barrier systems at typical municipal solid waste landfills in China.
中国典型城市固体废弃物填埋场中屏障系统的突破时间。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):58773-58782. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26645-7. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Geochemical, mineralogical and toxicological characteristics of coal fly ash and its environmental impacts.煤飞灰的地球化学、矿物学和毒理学特性及其环境影响。
Chemosphere. 2022 Nov;307(Pt 1):135710. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135710. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Effect of solid waste landfill leachate contaminants on hydraulic conductivity of landfill liners.垃圾填埋场渗滤液污染物对填埋场衬层水力传导性的影响。
Water Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;85(5):1581-1599. doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.033.
6
Compositional effects of clay-fly ash geopolymers on the sorption process of lead and zinc.黏土-粉煤灰地质聚合物的组成对铅锌吸附过程的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2021 May;50(3):768-781. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20207. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Leachability and adverse effects of coal fly ash: A review.粉煤灰的浸出性及其不利影响:综述
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Sep 5;396:122725. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122725. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
8
A simple contaminant fate and transport modelling tool for management and risk assessment of groundwater pollution from contaminated sites.一种简单的污染物运移模拟工具,用于管理和评估受污染场地地下水污染的风险。
J Contam Hydrol. 2019 Feb;221:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Contaminant retention characteristics of fly ash-bentonite mixes.粉煤灰-膨润土混合物的污染物截留特性
Waste Manag Res. 2017 Jan;35(1):40-46. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16670002. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment.中国矿区土壤重金属污染述评:污染与健康风险评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jan 15;468-469:843-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090. Epub 2013 Sep 25.