Patel Akshilkumar, Massand Sameer, Ingraham John
College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 700 HMC Crescent Road, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation, and Humanities, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Jun 20;10:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100102. eCollection 2022 Sep.
To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents.
Systematic review.
Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms and search term combinations. These studies were evaluated for inclusion based on PRISMA criteria.
Literature searches were performed from June to December 2020, and articles were collected if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies were also qualitatively assessed to determine whether the described education modality demonstrated high fidelity (anatomic accuracy and similarity to true surgery) and efficacy (improved trainee performance in a standardized skills evaluation). Initial database searches resulted in 2,849 total articles. Of these, 451 articles were deemed relevant for screening, and after applying additional exclusion criteria, 202 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Articles were organized into three broad categories: physical models ( = 42, 63.7%), virtual simulators ( = 16, 24.2%), and online resources ( = 8, 12.1%). Among the physical models, we identified 15 high fidelity, 20 high efficacy, 5 high fidelity and high efficacy, and 2 high efficacy but low fidelity models. Among the virtual simulators, 6 demonstrated high fidelity, 8 high efficacy, and 2 demonstrated both values. Among the online resources, 3 showed high fidelity and 3 showed high efficacy.
A variety of remote training modalities have been published, including articles describing virtual surgical simulators, virtual and physical anatomic models, and online resources with video modules. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how effectively training received through remote means translates to practice in live clinical scenarios in the operating room.
Practice-based Learning and Improvement.
系统回顾已发表的描述整形外科住院医师远程替代教育模式的文献。
系统评价。
独立研究人员使用多种医学主题词和搜索词组合在PubMed和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行检索。根据PRISMA标准对这些研究进行纳入评估。
于2020年6月至12月进行文献检索,符合纳入标准的文章被收集。还对研究进行了定性评估,以确定所描述的教育模式是否具有高逼真度(解剖学准确性和与真实手术的相似性)和有效性(在标准化技能评估中提高学员表现)。初步数据库检索共得到2849篇文章。其中,451篇文章被认为与筛选相关,在应用额外的排除标准后,对202篇文章进行了资格评估。其中,66篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入定性综合分析。文章分为三大类:物理模型(n = 42,63.7%)、虚拟模拟器(n = 16,24.2%)和在线资源(n = 8,12.1%)。在物理模型中,我们确定了15个高逼真度、20个高有效性、5个高逼真度和高有效性以及2个高有效性但低逼真度的模型。在虚拟模拟器中,6个具有高逼真度,8个具有高有效性,2个同时具备这两个特点。在在线资源中,3个具有高逼真度,3个具有高有效性。
已发表了多种远程培训模式,包括描述虚拟手术模拟器、虚拟和物理解剖模型以及带有视频模块的在线资源的文章。需要进一步研究以评估通过远程方式接受的培训在手术室的实际临床场景中转化为实践的效果如何。
涉及的ACGME能力:基于实践的学习与改进。