Deshpande Anshula N, Bane Pooja V, Baishya Simron, Shah Yash, Dori Sneha
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2024 Oct-Dec;15(4):225-231. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_338_23. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Preventive dental procedures are cornerstones of caries management.
This research aims to analyze the clinical effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants when applied to etched enamel pretreated with solvents compared to the conventional etch and seal technique.
Children and adolescents with clinically healthy occlusal surfaces or noncavitated occlusal carious lesions on permanent first and/or second molars in all four quadrants were randomly allocated into four groups. A total population of 87 participants (348 teeth) were selected for the research based on the inclusion criteria. Following the enrollment, teeth were etched and sequentially assigned for application of Group 1 = Conventional Etch Seal (control group), Group 2 = isopropyl alcohol (IPA), Group 3 = acetone, and Group 4 = ethanol before sealant application. All participants were evaluated for marginal integrity, discoloration, and clinical retention of pit and fissure sealant after 6-month intervals and 12-month intervals using Feigal's criteria.
At 6-month and 12-month intervals, the collected data were compiled and statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test of significance for marginal integrity between groups all four groups. The Wilcoxon rank test was assigned to assess the difference between parameters measured at 6 months and 12 months. A highly significant difference was found between the groups ( < 0.05) for marginal integrity and anatomic form at 6 months and 12 months when intergroup comparison was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Surfactants such as IPA and acetone can be adopted while choosing methods for the long-term clinical success of resin-based sealants for increasing wettability and penetration depth.
预防性牙科治疗是龋齿管理的基石。
本研究旨在分析与传统蚀刻和封闭技术相比,窝沟封闭剂应用于经溶剂预处理的蚀刻釉质时的临床效果。
四个象限中恒牙第一和/或第二磨牙临床健康咬合面或非龋性咬合龋损的儿童和青少年被随机分为四组。根据纳入标准,共选取87名参与者(348颗牙齿)进行研究。入组后,对牙齿进行蚀刻,并在应用封闭剂前依次分配为第1组 = 传统蚀刻封闭(对照组)、第2组 = 异丙醇(IPA)、第3组 = 丙酮和第4组 = 乙醇。使用费加尔标准在6个月间隔和12个月间隔后对所有参与者的窝沟封闭剂的边缘完整性、变色和临床保留情况进行评估。
在6个月和12个月间隔时,收集的数据进行整理,并使用卡方检验对所有四组之间边缘完整性的显著性进行统计分析。采用威尔科克森秩和检验评估6个月和12个月时测量参数之间的差异。当使用克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验进行组间比较时,发现6个月和12个月时组间在边缘完整性和解剖形态方面存在高度显著差异(<0.05)。
在选择基于树脂的封闭剂长期临床成功的方法时,可以采用IPA和丙酮等表面活性剂来提高润湿性和渗透深度。