Monzel Merlin, Agren Thomas, Tengler Matthias, Karneboge Jana, Reuter Martin
Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):e14756. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14756.
Imaginal exposure is a standard procedure of cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders. It is often used when in vivo exposure is not possible, too stressful for patients, or would be too expensive. The Bio-Informational Theory implies that imaginal exposure is effective because of the perceptual proximity of mental imagery to real events, whereas empirical findings suggest that propositional thought of fear stimuli (i.e., thinking about the stimuli without seeing them in the mind's eye) could be sufficient. To investigate whether mental imagery or propositional thought is crucial for the success of imaginal exposure, participants with the rare state of aphantasia (= absence of sensory mental imagery) and two control groups were subjected to a fear conditioning paradigm followed by imaginal exposure and a reinstatement procedure. During imaginal exposure, a control group (N = 30) stared at a bright screen to disrupt visual imagery by incoming luminance (=simulated aphantasia), while a second control group (N = 30) and participants with actual aphantasia (N = 30) kept their eyes closed. Results showed successful extinction in all groups, thus demonstrating that imaginal extinction is possible using propositional thought. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed less subjective fear in people with aphantasia during the fear conditioning procedure, potentially due to similar mechanisms as in alexithymia, that is, a decoupling between physiological arousal and emotional experience.
想象暴露是认知行为疗法中用于治疗焦虑症和恐慌症的标准程序。当无法进行现场暴露、现场暴露对患者压力过大或成本过高时,通常会使用想象暴露。生物信息理论认为,想象暴露之所以有效,是因为心理意象与真实事件在感知上接近,而实证研究结果表明,对恐惧刺激的命题性思考(即不通过脑海中的视觉想象来思考刺激)可能就足够了。为了探究心理意象或命题性思考对想象暴露的成功是否至关重要,对患有罕见的失想象症(即缺乏感官心理意象)的参与者和两个对照组进行了恐惧条件反射范式实验,随后进行想象暴露和恢复程序。在想象暴露期间,一个对照组(N = 30)盯着一个明亮的屏幕,以通过进入的亮度干扰视觉意象(模拟失想象症),而另一个对照组(N = 30)和患有实际失想象症的参与者(N = 30)则闭上眼睛。结果显示所有组均成功消退,从而表明使用命题性思考进行想象消退是可能的。此外,探索性分析显示,失想象症患者在恐惧条件反射过程中的主观恐惧较小,这可能是由于与述情障碍类似的机制,即生理唤醒与情感体验之间的脱耦。