Lee Seung-Jun, Kim Tae-Hoon, Lee Jae-Hwan, Ahn Chul-Min, Lee Sang-Hyup, Lee Yong-Joon, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Hong Myeong-Ki, Jang Yangsoo, Park Ha-Wook, Jang Ji Yong, Park Jae-Hyeong, Kim Su Hong, Im Eui, Park Sang-Ho, Choi Donghoon, Ko Young-Guk
Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Hanil General Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Division of Cardiology Cardiovascular Center, Bucheon Sejong Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar 10;18(5):558-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been shown to yield favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the specific benefits of IVUS for treatment of complex FPA lesions remain uncertain.
In this study, the authors compared the clinical impact of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DCB angioplasty in patients with complex or noncomplex FPA lesions.
This study was a prespecified, primary subgroup analysis of the randomized IVUS-DCB trial. Patients with FPA undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomized to receive the procedure under IVUS or angiography guidance. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency; secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), sustained clinical improvement, and hemodynamic improvement.
Among the 237 patients enrolled, 158 had complex FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] type C/D), and 79 had noncomplex FPA (TASC II type A/B). In complex FPA, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly higher rates of primary patency (82.1% vs 60.3%; HR for loss of primary patency: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70; P = 0.002), freedom from CD-TLR (90.0% vs 76.9%; HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75; P = 0.01), and sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement relative to angiography guidance. There was no significant difference in primary patency (87.5% vs 88.2%; HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.39-8.60; P = 0.44) or occurrence secondary endpoints between the IVUS-guidance and angiography-guidance groups for patients with noncomplex FPA.
In endovascular treatment of FPA using DCB, IVUS guidance was significantly associated with improved 12-month clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with complex FPA lesions. (Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease [IVUS-DCB] trial; NCT03517904).
血管内超声(IVUS)引导已被证明在药物涂层球囊(DCB)血管成形术治疗股腘动脉(FPA)疾病的血管内治疗中能产生良好的结果。然而,IVUS治疗复杂FPA病变的具体益处仍不确定。
在本研究中,作者比较了IVUS引导与血管造影引导的DCB血管成形术对复杂或非复杂FPA病变患者的临床影响。
本研究是随机IVUS-DCB试验的预先指定的主要亚组分析。接受DCB血管成形术的FPA患者被随机分配在IVUS或血管造影引导下接受该手术。主要终点是12个月的主要通畅率;次要终点包括临床驱动的靶病变血管重建(CD-TLR)、持续的临床改善和血流动力学改善。
在纳入的237例患者中,158例有复杂FPA(跨大西洋跨学会共识II [TASC II] C/D型),79例有非复杂FPA(TASC II A/B型)。在复杂FPA中,与血管造影引导相比,IVUS引导与显著更高的主要通畅率(82.1%对60.3%;主要通畅丧失的HR:0.34;95%CI:0.16 - 0.70;P = 0.002)、无CD-TLR(90.0%对76.9%;HR:0.31;95%CI:0.13 - 0.75;P = 0.01)以及持续的临床和血流动力学改善相关。对于非复杂FPA患者,IVUS引导组和血管造影引导组之间在主要通畅率(87.5%对88.2%;HR:1.84;�5%CI:0.39 - 8.60;P = 0.44)或次要终点的发生方面没有显著差异。
在使用DCB进行FPA的血管内治疗中,IVUS引导与12个月临床结果的改善显著相关,特别是在复杂FPA病变患者中。(股腘动脉疾病的血管内超声引导药物涂层球囊血管成形术[IVUS-DCB]试验;NCT03517904)