• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用医院衰弱风险评分来预测所有年龄段成年人的住院时间。

Using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to predict length of stay across all adult ages.

作者信息

Kutrani Huda, Briggs Jim, Prytherch David, Spice Claire

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 23;20(1):e0317234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317234. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317234
PMID:39847554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11756769/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has recently been used to predict adverse health outcomes including length of stay (LOS) in hospital. LOS is an important indicator for patient quality of care, the measurement of hospital performance, efficiency and costs. Tools to predict LOS may enable earlier interventions in those identified at higher risk of a long stay. Previous work focused on patients over 75 years of age, but we explore the relationship between HFRS and LOS for all adults.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a large acute hospital during the period from 01/01/2010 to 30/06/2018. The study included patients aged 16 years and older. We calculated HFRS for patients who had been previously admitted to the hospital within the previous 2 years. The study developed Logistic Regression models (crude and adjusted) for nine prediction periods of LOS to assess association between (LOS and HFRS) and (LOS and Charlson Comorbidity Index-CCI), using odds ratios, and AUROC to assess model performance.

RESULTS

An increase in HFRS is associated with prolonged LOS. HFRS alone or combined with CCI were more important predictor of long LOS in most of periods to predict LOS. However, crude HFRS was superior to the models where HFRS was combined with any other variable for LOS in excess of 21 days, which had AUROCs ranging from 0·867 to 0·890. Regarding eight age groups, crude HFRS remained the first or second most effective predictor of long LOS. HFRS alone or combined with CCI was superior to other models for patients older than 44 years for all periods of LOS; whereas for patients younger than 44 years it was superior for all LOS except 45, 60, and 90 days.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated the utility of HFRS to predict hospital LOS in patients across all ages.

摘要

背景

医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)最近被用于预测不良健康结局,包括住院时间(LOS)。住院时间是患者护理质量、医院绩效、效率和成本衡量的重要指标。预测住院时间的工具可能有助于对那些被确定为长期住院风险较高的患者进行早期干预。以往的研究主要集中在75岁以上的患者,但我们探讨了所有成年人中HFRS与住院时间之间的关系。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了一家大型急症医院2010年1月1日至2018年6月30日期间的数据。该研究纳入了16岁及以上的患者。我们计算了在过去2年内曾入院的患者的HFRS。该研究针对九个住院时间预测期建立了逻辑回归模型(粗模型和校正模型),以使用比值比评估(住院时间与HFRS)以及(住院时间与查尔森合并症指数-CCI)之间的关联,并使用曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型性能。

结果

HFRS的增加与住院时间延长相关。在大多数预测住院时间的时期,单独的HFRS或与CCI结合是长期住院的更重要预测因素。然而,对于超过21天的住院时间,粗HFRS优于将HFRS与任何其他变量结合的模型,其AUROC范围为0.867至0.890。关于八个年龄组,粗HFRS仍然是长期住院的第一或第二有效预测因素。对于所有住院时间的患者,单独的HFRS或与CCI结合在44岁以上的患者中优于其他模型;而对于44岁以下的患者,除了45天、60天和90天外,在所有住院时间内都更优。

结论

本研究证明了HFRS在预测各年龄段患者住院时间方面的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/ea7094f57945/pone.0317234.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/49ea01ace50c/pone.0317234.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/e717b1d72d20/pone.0317234.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/3d24de1251fb/pone.0317234.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/ea7094f57945/pone.0317234.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/49ea01ace50c/pone.0317234.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/e717b1d72d20/pone.0317234.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/3d24de1251fb/pone.0317234.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b418/11756769/ea7094f57945/pone.0317234.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to predict length of stay across all adult ages.使用医院衰弱风险评分来预测所有年龄段成年人的住院时间。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 23;20(1):e0317234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317234. eCollection 2025.
2
Frailty-aware surgical care: Validation of Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) in older surgical patients.衰弱感知型手术护理:老年手术患者中医院衰弱风险评分(HFRS)的验证。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2024 Feb 28;53(2):90-100. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023221.
3
Does identifying frailty from ICD-10 coded data on hospital admission improve prediction of adverse outcomes in older surgical patients? A population-based study.从入院时的 ICD-10 编码数据中识别虚弱是否能提高老年手术患者不良结局的预测能力?一项基于人群的研究。
Age Ageing. 2021 May 5;50(3):802-808. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa214.
4
Hospital frailty risk score predicts high-value care outcomes following brain metastasis resection.医院脆弱性风险评分可预测脑转移瘤切除术后的高价值医疗结果。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;245:108497. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108497. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Combining the Hospital Frailty Risk Score With the Charlson and Elixhauser Multimorbidity Indices to Identify Older Patients at Risk of Poor Outcomes in Acute Care.将医院衰弱风险评分与 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 多种合并症指数相结合,以识别急性护理中风险较高的老年患者的不良结局。
Med Care. 2024 Feb 1;62(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001962. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
6
Frailty, length of stay and cost in hip fracture patients.髋部骨折患者的衰弱、住院时间及费用
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Jan;34(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06553-1. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
7
Leveraging HFRS to assess how frailty affects healthcare resource utilization after elective ACDF for CSM.利用肾综合征出血热来评估衰弱如何影响脊髓型颈椎病择期前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后的医疗资源利用。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
Beyond the revised cardiac risk index: Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in non-cardiac surgery.超越修正后的心脏风险指数:医院衰弱风险评分在非心脏手术中的验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0262322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262322. eCollection 2022.
9
External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score and comparison with the Hospital-patient One-year Mortality Risk Score to predict outcomes in elderly hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study.医院衰弱风险评分的外部验证及与医院-患者一年死亡率风险评分的比较,以预测老年住院患者的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):284-288. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008661. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
The hospital frailty risk score independently predicts postoperative outcomes in meningioma patients.医院衰弱风险评分可独立预测脑膜瘤患者的术后结局。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 May;123:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.019. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Age does not improve the predictive ability of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score for length of stay.年龄并不能提高医院衰弱风险评分对住院时间的预测能力。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330930. eCollection 2025.
2
In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous ablative therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis in patients with and without frailty: nationwide inpatient sample analysis 2005-2020.2005年至2020年全国住院患者样本分析:有虚弱和无虚弱的结直肠癌肝转移患者经皮消融治疗的院内结局
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1280-1290. doi: 10.62347/MQXG6358. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining the Hospital Frailty Risk Score With the Charlson and Elixhauser Multimorbidity Indices to Identify Older Patients at Risk of Poor Outcomes in Acute Care.将医院衰弱风险评分与 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 多种合并症指数相结合,以识别急性护理中风险较高的老年患者的不良结局。
Med Care. 2024 Feb 1;62(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001962. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
Association Between Clinical Frailty Scale Score and Length of Stay in a Complex Discharge Unit.临床衰弱量表评分与复杂出院单元住院时间之间的关联。
Ir Med J. 2021 Jan 18;114(1):238.
3
Frailty in younger adults in hospital.
医院中青年人群的脆弱性。
QJM. 2023 Oct 23;116(10):845-849. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcad173.
4
Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis.医院衰弱风险评分(HFRS)可预测慢性胰腺炎住院患者的不良结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jul;68(7):2890-2898. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07946-w. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
A comparison between the clinical frailty scale and the hospital frailty risk score to risk stratify older people with emergency care needs.临床虚弱量表与医院虚弱风险评分在风险分层老年急诊患者中的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00730-5.
6
Changes in the severity and lethality of age-related health deficit accumulation in the USA between 1999 and 2018: a population-based cohort study.1999年至2018年间美国与年龄相关的健康缺陷累积的严重程度和致死率变化:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Feb;2(2):e96-e104. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30059-3. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
External Validation of the Hospital Frailty-Risk Score in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Older Heart-Failure Patients in Australia.澳大利亚老年心力衰竭患者医院虚弱风险评分预测临床结局的外部验证
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2193. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082193.
8
Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.受试者工作特征曲线:概述与临床医师的实际应用
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb;75(1):25-36. doi: 10.4097/kja.21209. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Beyond the revised cardiac risk index: Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in non-cardiac surgery.超越修正后的心脏风险指数:医院衰弱风险评分在非心脏手术中的验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0262322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262322. eCollection 2022.
10
Hospital Frailty Risk Score and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgery for Primary Spinal Intradural/Cord Tumors.原发性脊髓硬膜内/脊髓肿瘤手术后的医院虚弱风险评分与医疗资源利用情况
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):2074-2084. doi: 10.1177/21925682211069937. Epub 2022 Jan 11.