Suzuki Shinsuke, Akahane Toshiaki, Tanimoto Akihide, Higashi Michiyo, Kitazono Ikumi, Kirishima Mari, Nishigaki Masakazu, Ikeda Toshiro, Kanemitsu Shuichi, Nakazawa Junichi, Akahane Erina, Nishihara Hiroshi, Uozumi Kimiharu, Yoshimitsu Makoto, Ishitsuka Kenji, Ueno Shin-Ichi
Cancer Center, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Course of Advanced Therapeutics, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 23;20(1):e0305025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305025. eCollection 2025.
Kinase-related gene fusion and point mutations play pivotal roles as drivers in cancer, necessitating optimized, targeted therapy against these alterations. The efficacy of molecularly targeted therapeutics varies depending on the specific alteration, with great success reported for such therapeutics in the treatment of cancer with kinase fusion proteins. However, the involvement of actionable alterations in solid tumors, especially regarding kinase fusions, remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the number of actionable alterations in patients with tyrosine or serine/threonine kinase domain fusions, mutations, and copy number alterations (CNAs). We analyzed 613 patients with 40 solid cancer types who visited our division between June 2020 and April 2024. Furthermore, to detect alterations involving multiple-fusion calling, we performed comprehensive genomic sequencing using FoundationOne® companion diagnostic (F1CDx) and FoundationOne® Liquid companion diagnostic (F1LCDx). Patient characteristics and genomic profiles were analyzed to assess the frequency and distribution of actionable alterations across different cancer types. Notably, 44 of the 613 patients had fusions involving kinases, transcriptional regulators, or tumor suppressors. F1CDx and F1LCDx detected 13 cases with kinase-domain fusions. We identified 117 patients with kinase-domain mutations and 58 with kinase-domain CNAs. The number of actionable alterations in patients with kinase-domain fusion, mutation, or CNA (median [interquartile range; IQR]) was 2 (1-3), 5 (3-7), and 6 (4-8), respectively. Patients with kinase fusion had significantly fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase-domain mutations and CNAs. However, those with fusion involving tumor suppressors tended to have more actionable alterations (median [IQR]; 4 [2-9]). Cancers with kinase fusions exhibited fewer actionable alterations than those with kinase mutations and CNAs. These findings underscore the importance of detecting kinase alterations and indicate the pivotal role of kinase fusions as strong drivers of cancer development, highlighting their potential as prime targets for molecular therapeutics.
激酶相关基因融合和点突变在癌症发生过程中作为驱动因素发挥着关键作用,因此需要针对这些改变进行优化的靶向治疗。分子靶向治疗的疗效因具体改变而异,在治疗具有激酶融合蛋白的癌症方面,这类治疗取得了巨大成功。然而,实体瘤中可操作改变的情况,尤其是激酶融合方面,仍不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在比较酪氨酸或丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶结构域融合、突变和拷贝数改变(CNA)患者中可操作改变的数量。我们分析了2020年6月至2024年4月期间前来我科就诊的613例患有40种实体癌类型的患者。此外,为了检测涉及多重融合检测的改变,我们使用FoundationOne®伴随诊断(F1CDx)和FoundationOne®液体伴随诊断(F1LCDx)进行了全面基因组测序。分析患者特征和基因组概况,以评估不同癌症类型中可操作改变的频率和分布。值得注意的是,613例患者中有44例发生了涉及激酶、转录调节因子或肿瘤抑制因子的融合。F1CDx和F1LCDx检测到13例激酶结构域融合病例。我们鉴定出117例激酶结构域突变患者和58例激酶结构域CNA患者。激酶结构域融合、突变或CNA患者的可操作改变数量(中位数[四分位间距;IQR])分别为2(1 - 3)、5(3 - 7)和6(4 - 8)。激酶融合患者的可操作改变显著少于激酶结构域突变和CNA患者。然而,涉及肿瘤抑制因子融合的患者往往有更多的可操作改变(中位数[IQR];4[2 - 9])。具有激酶融合的癌症比具有激酶突变和CNA的癌症表现出更少的可操作改变。这些发现强调了检测激酶改变的重要性,并表明激酶融合作为癌症发展的强大驱动因素的关键作用,突出了它们作为分子治疗主要靶点的潜力。