Monfort-Mira Montserrat, Balaguer-Castro Mariano, Jornet-Gibert Montsant, Cito Salvatore, De la Flor-López Silvia, Torner Pere
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug;40(8):2160-2166. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
Effective management of postsurgical pain following arthroplasty remains a challenge, lacking a definitive gold standard. As most knee and hip arthroplasties are cemented or hybrid, we used the property of bone cement as a drug carrier and added powdered local anesthetics (lidocaine hydrochloride and bupivacaine hydrochloride) to the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as analgesics. However, the addition of drugs to bone cement may compromise its mechanical properties, necessitating a thorough analysis. Our objective was to assess the impact of added local anesthetics on the mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement.
Mechanical properties, including compressive strength, bending modulus, and bending strength, were evaluated following the procedure set by the International Organization for Standardization 5833-2002 and the American Society for Testing and Materials F451-1 standards. There were three of the following study groups compared: PMMA, PMMA with lidocaine hydrochloride, and PMMA with bupivacaine hydrochloride.
Significant differences were observed between groups in compressive and bending strength, but not in bending modulus. Despite these differences, the mean compressive strength and bending modulus of all groups and the mean bending strength of the lidocaine group surpassed the minimum values set by the International Organization for Standardization 5833-2002 and American Society for Testing and Materials F 451-08 standards for acrylic bone cement. However, the bupivacaine group fell short of the minimum bending strength value.
The addition of powdered local anesthetics to PMMA affects its mechanical properties, specifically compressive and bending strength, without compromising the bending modulus. While differences were noted, all groups surpassed the minimum standards for compressive strength and bending modulus. However, the bupivacaine group did not meet the minimum bending strength requirement. This highlights the importance of considering mechanical properties when incorporating drugs into bone cement for implant fixation.
关节置换术后疼痛的有效管理仍然是一项挑战,缺乏明确的金标准。由于大多数膝关节和髋关节置换术采用骨水泥固定或混合固定,我们利用骨水泥作为药物载体的特性,将粉末状局部麻醉剂(盐酸利多卡因和盐酸布比卡因)添加到聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)中作为镇痛药。然而,向骨水泥中添加药物可能会损害其机械性能,因此需要进行全面分析。我们的目的是评估添加局部麻醉剂对PMMA骨水泥机械性能的影响。
按照国际标准化组织5833-2002和美国材料与试验协会F451-1标准规定的程序,评估包括抗压强度、弯曲模量和弯曲强度在内的机械性能。比较以下三个研究组:PMMA、含盐酸利多卡因的PMMA和含盐酸布比卡因的PMMA。
各组之间在抗压强度和弯曲强度上存在显著差异,但在弯曲模量上没有差异。尽管存在这些差异,但所有组的平均抗压强度和弯曲模量以及利多卡因组的平均弯曲强度均超过了国际标准化组织5833-2002和美国材料与试验协会F 451-08标准对丙烯酸骨水泥设定的最小值。然而,布比卡因组未达到最小弯曲强度值。
向PMMA中添加粉末状局部麻醉剂会影响其机械性能,特别是抗压强度和弯曲强度,而不会影响弯曲模量。虽然存在差异,但所有组均超过了抗压强度和弯曲模量的最低标准。然而,布比卡因组未满足最小弯曲强度要求。这突出了在将药物掺入骨水泥用于植入物固定时考虑机械性能的重要性。