• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰首发精神分裂症抗精神病治疗策略预防复发的比较有效性:一项基于人群的队列研究

Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment strategies for relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Taipale Heidi, Tanskanen Antti, Howes Oliver, Correll Christoph U, Kane John M, Tiihonen Jari

机构信息

Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Population Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;12(2):122-130. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00366-3.

DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00366-3
PMID:
39848730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11750763/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The best pharmacological treatment practices for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia are unclear. We aimed to assess different treatment strategies used before and after the first relapse, and their associations with subsequent relapse risk.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study, we enrolled individuals (aged ≤45 years) with first-episode schizophrenia who were hospitalised and subsequently relapsed between 1996 and 2014 from the nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Individuals who had not been taking antipsychotics within the year preceeding initial hospitalisation and who had a relapse within 5 years of discharge were included in the analyses. Treatment strategies were assessed during the 30 days before hospitalisation for the first relapse and 30 days after discharge and were categorised as either long-acting injectable, clozapine, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic polypharmacy, and antipsychotic non-use. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of the risk of second relapse based on treatment type were analysed with Cox regression models for 2 years after the first relapse, or until death or end of data linkage (Dec 31, 2017). People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research and writing process.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 1996 and Dec 31, 2017, 3000 individuals had their first psychosis relapse and were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 30·0 years (SD 7·6), 1069 (35·6%) of patients were women and 1931 (64·4%) men. No ethnicity data were available. 2148 (71·7%) had a second relapse within 2 years. Before first relapse, most individuals were either not using antipsychotics (n=1366 [45·5%]), or were using non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (n=973 [32·4%]). Compared with continuing the same treatment strategy used before the first relapse, switching to clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of second relapse compared with continuing any non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (aHR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49-0·89; relapse rate 73·2% with oral non-clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy continuation vs 57·1% with switch to clozapine). Switching to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (0·99, 0·76-1·28) was approximately as unhelpful in preventing the next relapse as switching to antipsychotic non-use (1·07, 0·80-1·42).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with first-episode schizophrenia having their first psychosis relapse despite use of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, continuation with the same antipsychotic modality or switch to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic did not show evidence of being beneficial in relapse prevention, suggesting that clozapine should be started instead. This finding, together with existing knowledge of decreased risk of mortality associated with clozapine, challenges current treatment guidelines that recommend clozapine as a third-line treatment, resulting in treatment practices characterised by long delays to clozapine initiation.

FUNDING

Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.

摘要

背景

首发精神分裂症患者预防复发的最佳药物治疗方案尚不清楚。我们旨在评估首次复发前后使用的不同治疗策略及其与后续复发风险的关联。

方法

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们从芬兰全国医院出院登记处纳入了1996年至2014年间首次发作精神分裂症且住院后复发的个体(年龄≤45岁)。分析纳入了首次住院前一年内未服用抗精神病药物且出院后5年内复发的个体。在首次复发住院前30天和出院后30天评估治疗策略,并分为长效注射剂、氯氮平、非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单药治疗、非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物联合治疗和未使用抗精神病药物。采用Cox回归模型分析首次复发后2年或直至死亡或数据链接结束(2017年12月31日)基于治疗类型的第二次复发风险的调整风险比(aHR)。有精神分裂症生活经历的人未参与研究和撰写过程。

结果

在1996年1月31日至2017年12月31日期间,3000名个体首次出现精神病复发且符合分析条件。平均年龄为30.0岁(标准差7.6),1069名(35.6%)患者为女性,1931名(64.4%)为男性。没有种族数据。2148名(71.7%)在2年内出现第二次复发。在首次复发前,大多数个体要么未使用抗精神病药物(n = 1366 [45.5%]),要么使用非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单药治疗(n = 973 [32.4%])。与继续使用首次复发前相同的治疗策略相比,与继续任何非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单药治疗相比,改用氯氮平与第二次复发风险最低相关(aHR 0.66,95%CI 0.49 - 0.89;口服非氯氮平抗精神病药物单药治疗持续使用的复发率为73.2%,改用氯氮平的复发率为57.1%)。改用另一种非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物单药治疗(0.99,0.76 - 1.28)在预防下次复发方面与改用未使用抗精神病药物(1.07,0.80 - 1.42)大致同样无益。

解读

在首发精神分裂症患者中,尽管使用了非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物仍首次出现精神病复发,继续使用相同的抗精神病药物模式或改用另一种非氯氮平口服抗精神病药物在预防复发方面未显示出有益证据,这表明应改为使用氯氮平。这一发现与现有的关于氯氮平降低死亡风险的知识一起,对当前推荐氯氮平作为三线治疗的治疗指南提出了挑战,导致治疗实践中氯氮平起始使用存在长时间延迟的特点。

资助

西格丽德·尤塞利乌斯基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/d6a1d83ae192/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/005741e3a0eb/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/26f314350366/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/887c103f8820/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/d6a1d83ae192/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/005741e3a0eb/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/26f314350366/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/887c103f8820/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/11750763/d6a1d83ae192/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment strategies for relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a population-based cohort study.芬兰首发精神分裂症抗精神病治疗策略预防复发的比较有效性:一项基于人群的队列研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;12(2):122-130. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00366-3.
2
Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic doses for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a nationwide, register-based cohort study.芬兰首发精神分裂症患者预防复发的抗精神病药物剂量的真实世界疗效:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;9(4):271-279. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00015-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Association of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy vs Monotherapy With Psychiatric Rehospitalization Among Adults With Schizophrenia.抗精神病药联合治疗与单药治疗与成人精神分裂症患者精神科再入院的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;76(5):499-507. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4320.
4
Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia.29823例精神分裂症患者全国队列中抗精神病药物治疗的真实世界有效性
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):686-693. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1322.
5
Long-term persistence of the risk of agranulocytosis with clozapine compared with other antipsychotics: a nationwide cohort and case-control study in Finland.与其他抗精神病药物相比,氯氮平导致粒细胞缺乏症风险的长期持续存在:芬兰全国队列和病例对照研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;11(6):443-450. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00097-X. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.抗精神病药治疗精神分裂谱系障碍患者的疗效比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438358. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38358.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs for Rehospitalization in Schizophrenia-A Nationwide Study With 20-Year Follow-up.抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症患者再入院的疗效比较——一项具有 20 年随访的全国性研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 17;44(6):1381-1387. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx176.
8
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
9
Long-term treatment with clozapine and other antipsychotic drugs and the risk of haematological malignancies in people with schizophrenia: a nationwide case-control and cohort study in Finland.长期使用氯氮平和其他抗精神病药物与精神分裂症患者血液系统恶性肿瘤风险的关系:芬兰全国范围内的病例对照和队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 May;9(5):353-362. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00044-X. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
10
Pneumonia Risk, Antipsychotic Dosing, and Anticholinergic Burden in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的肺炎风险、抗精神病药物剂量和抗胆碱能负担。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 1;81(10):967-975. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1441.

引用本文的文献

1
Clozapine: past, present and future.氯氮平:过去、现在与未来。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):153-154. doi: 10.1002/wps.21335.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable oral antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效注射用口服抗精神病药物治疗早期精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jun 2;14:20451253241257062. doi: 10.1177/20451253241257062. eCollection 2024.
2
Response rates to sequential trials of antipsychotic medications according to algorithms or treatment guidelines in psychotic disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗精神病药物序贯试验治疗精神障碍的反应率:基于算法或治疗指南的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2024 Jun;268:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
Treatment resistance in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates.精神分裂症的治疗抵抗:患病率和相关因素的荟萃分析。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;45(5):448-458. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3126. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
What are the barriers and facilitators of clozapine use in early psychosis? A survey of UK early intervention clinicians.在早期精神病中使用氯氮平的障碍和促进因素有哪些?一项对英国早期干预临床医生的调查。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Apr 28;9(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00353-0.
5
The response of subgroups of patients with schizophrenia to different antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症亚组患者对不同抗精神病药物的反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;9(11):884-893. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00304-2. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
Clozapine's multiple cellular mechanisms: What do we know after more than fifty years? A systematic review and critical assessment of translational mechanisms relevant for innovative strategies in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.氯氮平的多种细胞机制:五十多年后我们了解多少?对治疗抵抗性精神分裂症创新策略相关转化机制的系统回顾和批判性评估。
Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Aug;236:108236. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108236. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
7
Mortality in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of relative risk and aggravating or attenuating factors.精神分裂症患者的死亡率:相对风险以及加重或减轻因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):248-271. doi: 10.1002/wps.20994.
8
Systematic literature review of schizophrenia clinical practice guidelines on acute and maintenance management with antipsychotics.关于抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症急性和维持治疗管理的临床实践指南的系统文献综述
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 Feb 24;8(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00192-x.
9
Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic doses for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a nationwide, register-based cohort study.芬兰首发精神分裂症患者预防复发的抗精神病药物剂量的真实世界疗效:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;9(4):271-279. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00015-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Schizophrenia.精神分裂症。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):473-486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01730-X.