Hohendorff Jerzy, Grzelka-Wozniak Agata, Wrobel Marta, Kania Michal, Lapinska Lidia, Rokicka Dominika, Stoltny Dorota, Kowalska Irina, Strojek Krzysztof, Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz Dorota, Malecki Maciej T
Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Internal Medicine, Metabolic Diseases and Diabetology Clinical Department, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 9;15:1503891. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1503891. eCollection 2024.
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control and quality of life. Data on glycemic indices and fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) in newly diagnosed T1DM patients are limited.
To assess the impact of initiating intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) within 1-6 months of diagnosis on glycemic control and FoH in adults with T1DM.
After wearing a blinded sensor for 14 days, participants were randomized (1:1) to either isCGM (intervention) or self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) with glucometers and blinded CGM (control). Primary outcomes were changes in time below 70 mg/dl (TB70) and FoH, assessed in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS). Main secondary outcomes included changes in mean glucose and time in range (TIR) from baseline to 4 weeks after randomization.
The full analysis set included 23 patients (12 from the intervention group and 11 from the control group), aged 25.6 ± 5.1 years (14 men, 9 women). All participants were on multiple daily insulin injections. TB70 changed from 2.42% to 2.25% in the intervention, and from 2.81% to 1.82% in the control group, and the between-therapy difference of 0.83% was insignificant. No difference between intervention and control groups in change in HFS-worry and HFS-behavior subscales between baseline and after 4 weeks was found (-1.6 ± 3.2 and 1.0 ± 2.2, respectively). The mean glucose levels changed from 7.03 mmol/l to 6.73 mmol/l and from 7.07 mmol/l to 7.43 mmol/l, in the intervention and control groups, respectively, which resulted in a between-therapy significant glucose difference of -0.66 mmol/l. The mean TIR changed from 88.0% to 90.0% in the intervention group and from 85.2 to 84.1% in the control group-the between-therapy difference was insignificant (3,1%). The study ended early due to CGM reimbursement policy changes, after which most patients eligible for the study could have isCGM reimbursed.
In newly diagnosed T1DM adults, TIR is high and hypoglycemia risk is low. The study group was small; however, the data suggest that the use of isCGM soon after T1DM diagnosis could result in mean glucose decrease, but not in change in TB70 and FoH.
持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)可改善血糖控制和生活质量。新诊断的1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的血糖指数和低血糖恐惧(FoH)数据有限。
评估在诊断后1 - 6个月内开始间歇性扫描CGM(isCGM)对成年T1DM患者血糖控制和FoH的影响。
在佩戴盲法传感器14天后,参与者被随机(1:1)分为isCGM组(干预组)或使用血糖仪进行自我血糖监测(SMBG)及盲法CGM组(对照组)。主要结局指标为血糖低于70 mg/dl的时间(TB70)变化和FoH,通过低血糖恐惧调查(HFS)进行评估。主要次要结局指标包括随机分组后从基线到4周的平均血糖变化和血糖达标时间(TIR)变化。
完整分析集包括23例患者(干预组12例,对照组11例),年龄25.6±5.1岁(男性14例,女性9例)。所有参与者均接受每日多次胰岛素注射。干预组TB70从2.42%降至2.25%,对照组从2.81%降至1.82%,治疗组间差异0.83%无统计学意义。干预组和对照组在基线和4周后HFS - 担忧和HFS - 行为子量表变化方面无差异(分别为-1.6±3.2和1.0±2.2)。干预组和对照组的平均血糖水平分别从7.03 mmol/l降至6.73 mmol/l和从7.07 mmol/l升至7.43 mmol/l,治疗组间血糖差异有统计学意义,为-0.66 mmol/l。干预组平均TIR从88.0%升至90.0%,对照组从85.2%降至84.1%,治疗组间差异无统计学意义(3.1%)。由于CGM报销政策变化,研究提前结束,此后大多数符合研究条件的患者可报销isCGM。
新诊断的成年T1DM患者TIR较高,低血糖风险较低。研究样本量较小;然而,数据表明T1DM诊断后不久使用isCGM可使平均血糖降低,但不会使TB70和FoH发生变化。