• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形手术随机对照试验中的反向脆弱性指数

Reverse Fragility Index in Plastic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Ahdoot Rodney, Benítez Trista M, Wang Chien-Wei, Chung Kevin C

机构信息

From the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 23;13(1):e6456. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006456. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006456
PMID:39850534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11756890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a measure used to evaluate the neutrality of statistically nonsignificant findings in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RFI represents the minimum number of events needed to reverse a statistically nonsignificant result into a significant one. This study applied the RFI to examine the robustness of statistically nonsignificant RCTs in plastic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the 10 highest impact journals covering plastic and reconstructive surgery topics was conducted to identify RCTs published between January 2000 and March 2023. The Fisher exact test was used to calculate the RFI for each primary outcome. Bivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association of trial characteristics with the RFI.

RESULTS

Forty RCTs that yielded 65 primary outcomes were included in the analysis with a median sample size of 76 participants (interquartile range [IQR], 49-129) and a median of 10 events (IQR, 3-22). The median RFI was 4 (IQR, 3-5), indicating that statistical significance would have been achieved if 4 participants had a change in event status. The median RFQ was 0.053 (IQR, 0.038-0.08). Most studies (21 of 40) did not perform statistical power analysis. Twelve of 40 RCTs did not report or clearly indicate loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of RCTs in the plastic surgery literature demonstrate fragility as the preservation of nonsignificant results rested on a small number of events. The RFI is a useful measure to complement the value and examine the neutrality of null clinical trials.

摘要

背景

反向脆弱性指数(RFI)是一种用于评估随机对照试验(RCT)中统计学无显著性结果的中立性的指标。RFI代表将统计学无显著性结果转变为显著性结果所需的最小事件数。本研究应用RFI来检验整形外科中统计学无显著性RCT的稳健性。

方法

对涵盖整形与重建外科主题的10种影响因子最高的期刊进行系统文献检索,以确定2000年1月至2023年3月发表的RCT。采用Fisher精确检验计算每个主要结局的RFI。进行双变量分析以研究试验特征与RFI之间的关联。

结果

分析纳入了产生65个主要结局的40项RCT,样本量中位数为76名参与者(四分位间距[IQR],49 - 129),事件中位数为10个(IQR,3 - 22)。RFI中位数为4(IQR,3 - 5),表明如果有4名参与者的事件状态发生变化,就会达到统计学显著性。RFQ中位数为0.053(IQR,0.038 - 0.08)。大多数研究(40项中的21项)未进行统计效能分析。40项RCT中有12项未报告或未明确说明失访情况。

结论

整形外科学文献中RCT的结果显示出脆弱性,因为无显著性结果的维持依赖于少数事件。RFI是一种有用的指标,可补充P值并检验无效临床试验的中立性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd67/11756890/711f9d26e88b/gox-13-e6456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd67/11756890/674ba5a47eac/gox-13-e6456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd67/11756890/711f9d26e88b/gox-13-e6456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd67/11756890/674ba5a47eac/gox-13-e6456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd67/11756890/711f9d26e88b/gox-13-e6456-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reverse Fragility Index in Plastic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials.整形手术随机对照试验中的反向脆弱性指数
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 23;13(1):e6456. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006456. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results.反向脆弱指数在统计学上无显著意义的随机临床试验结果中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12469.
3
The Reverse Fragility Index for Mortality End Points in Randomized Trials Comparing Uncemented and Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Intracapsular Hip Fractures.比较非骨水泥型与骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗囊内髋部骨折的随机试验中死亡率终点的反向脆弱性指数
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.034. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Assessing the robustness of negative vascular surgery randomized controlled trials using their reverse fragility index.评估阴性血管外科学随机对照试验的稳健性:使用其反向脆弱指数。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;78(1):253-259.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.029. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Statistical Fragility of Studies Comparing Revision Rates After Manual Versus Robotic-Assisted or Computer-Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较人工与机器人辅助或计算机导航全髋关节置换术后翻修率的研究的统计脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Oct;40(10):2763-2770. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.063. Epub 2025 May 7.
6
The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Current Literature on Long-Term Survivorship of Computer-Navigated Versus Conventional TKA: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.反向脆弱性指数:解读当前关于计算机导航与传统全膝关节置换术长期生存率的文献:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和横断面研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 18;105(2):157-163. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00311. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
The application of the reverse fragility index to randomized controlled trials in hand surgery.反向脆弱性指数在手部外科随机对照试验中的应用。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2025 Mar 27:17531934251327880. doi: 10.1177/17531934251327880.
8
The Majority of Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy-Related Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting Nonsignificant Results Are Statistically Fragile.大多数报道无显著性结果的运动医学和关节镜相关随机对照试验在统计学上是脆弱的。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2071-2083.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
The fragility index and reverse fragility index of FDA investigational device exemption trials in spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review.脊柱融合手术中 FDA 调查器械豁免试验的脆弱指数和反向脆弱指数:一项系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jul;33(7):2594-2603. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08317-3. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
The fragility of statistical findings in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.反式全肩关节置换文献中统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1650-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in the Femoral Neck Fracture Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.股骨颈骨折文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e230-e237. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002793.
2
Statistical fragility of outcomes in acellular dermal matrix literature: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.脱细胞真皮基质文献中结局的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.047. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
3
The Fragility of Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials in the Plastic Surgery Literature.
整形外科学术文献中标志性随机对照试验的脆弱性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):e5352. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005352. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
How Fragile Are the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials: Is It Time to Rethink How We Analyze Data?: Commentary on an article by Jeffrey L. Shi, BS, et al.: "The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Current Literature on Long-Term Survivorship of Computer-Navigated Versus Conventional TKA. A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials".随机对照试验的结果有多脆弱:是时候重新思考我们分析数据的方式了吗?:对杰弗里·L·施(Jeffrey L. Shi)等人所著文章的评论:“反向脆弱性指数:解读关于计算机导航与传统全膝关节置换术长期生存率的当前文献。一项随机对照试验的系统评价和横断面研究”
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 18;105(2):e8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01118.
5
The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Current Literature on Long-Term Survivorship of Computer-Navigated Versus Conventional TKA: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.反向脆弱性指数:解读当前关于计算机导航与传统全膝关节置换术长期生存率的文献:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和横断面研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 18;105(2):157-163. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00311. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Reverse Fragility Index in Negative Cardiac Procedural Randomized Controlled Trials.阴性心脏介入随机对照试验中的反向脆弱性指数
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;35(3):493-496. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results.反向脆弱指数在统计学上无显著意义的随机临床试验结果中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12469.
8
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery.整形外科中统计学显著的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1238-1245. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006102.
9
Strategic Considerations for Effective Sagittal Resection of the Mandible to Achieve a Slim and Attractive Jawline.实现下颌骨矢状面有效切除以获得纤细且迷人颌线的策略考量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):152-155. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003932.
10
Why the p Value Alone Is Not Enough: The Need for Confidence Intervals in Plastic Surgery Research.为何仅靠P值并不够:整形外科学研究中置信区间的必要性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):152e-162e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003960.