Suppr超能文献

无所不包:一种用于健康信息技术可用性测试的混合方法。

Everything but the Kitchen Sink: A Mixed Methods Approach to Health IT Usability Testing.

作者信息

Schubel Laura, Littlejohn Robin, Barrientos Ronald Romero, Arnold Ryan, Capan Muge, Miller Kristen

机构信息

National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington DC, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA, USA.

出版信息

Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2019 Nov;63(1):718-722. doi: 10.1177/1071181319631290. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

Abstract

Usability testing has become a necessary step to successfully implement health information technology, but despite the expanded variety of usability methods, systems still are not guaranteed to meet user needs in a hectic and dynamic healthcare environment. The present work discusses some of the metrics employed with the intent of usability testing clinical decision support alerts for the early identification of sepsis patients. By utilizing methods such as eye tracking, think aloud protocols, human computer interaction, and more, health information technology can be adequately developed to ensure effective, efficacious, and optimal integration.

摘要

可用性测试已成为成功实施健康信息技术的必要步骤,但尽管可用性方法种类不断增加,在忙碌且动态的医疗环境中,系统仍不能保证满足用户需求。本研究讨论了一些用于可用性测试临床决策支持警报以早期识别脓毒症患者的指标。通过利用眼动追踪、出声思考协议、人机交互等方法,可以充分开发健康信息技术,以确保有效、高效且优化的整合。

相似文献

1
Everything but the Kitchen Sink: A Mixed Methods Approach to Health IT Usability Testing.
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2019 Nov;63(1):718-722. doi: 10.1177/1071181319631290. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
"Think aloud" and "Near live" usability testing of two complex clinical decision support tools.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Oct;106:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
5
Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Nursing Response to a Real-Time Alerting Tool for Sepsis: A Provider Survey.
Am J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;1(3). doi: 10.24150/ajhm/2017.021. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
2
Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013 Oct 1;10(Fall):1c. eCollection 2013.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
4
Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e2-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
6
Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 25;171(14):1281-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.327.
8
Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: bootstrapping multiple methods.
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun;38(3):189-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.015. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
9
Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;27(4):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.03.019.
10
The future vision of simulation in health care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-10. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验