• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能的使用、治疗联盟与心理服务从业者工作投入之间的因果关系

Causal Relationships Between the Use of AI, Therapeutic Alliance, and Job Engagement Among Psychological Service Practitioners.

作者信息

Arnout Boshra A, Alshehri Sami M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Education, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 2380, Abha 62521, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Psychology, College of Arts, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;15(1):21. doi: 10.3390/bs15010021.

DOI:10.3390/bs15010021
PMID:39851825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762742/
Abstract

Despite the significant increase in studies on AI applications in many aspects of life, its applications in mental health services still require further studies. This study aimed to test a proposed structural model of the relationships between AI use, therapeutic alliance, and job engagement by PLS-SEM. The descriptive method was applied. The sample consisted of (382) mental health service providers in Saudi Arabia, including 178 men and 204 women between 25 and 50 (36.32 ± 6.43) years old. The Artificial Intelligence Questionnaire, the Therapeutic Alliance Scale, and the Job Engagement Scale were applied in this study. The results showed the structural model's predictability for using AI and the therapeutic alliance in predicting job engagement and explaining the causal relationships between them compared to the indicator average and linear models. The study also found a strong positive overall statistically significant effect ( < 0.05) of the use of AI on therapeutic alliance (0.941) and job engagement (0.930) and a positive overall average statistically significant effect ( < 0.05) of the therapeutic alliance on job engagement (0.694). These findings indicated the importance of integrating AI applications and therapeutic alliance skills into training and professional development plans.

摘要

尽管人工智能在生活诸多方面的应用研究显著增加,但其在心理健康服务中的应用仍需进一步研究。本研究旨在通过偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)检验所提出的人工智能使用、治疗联盟和工作投入之间关系的结构模型。采用描述性方法。样本包括沙特阿拉伯的382名心理健康服务提供者,其中178名男性和204名女性,年龄在25至50岁之间(平均36.32 ± 6.43岁)。本研究使用了人工智能问卷、治疗联盟量表和工作投入量表。结果表明,与指标平均模型和线性模型相比,该结构模型在使用人工智能和治疗联盟预测工作投入以及解释它们之间的因果关系方面具有可预测性。研究还发现,人工智能的使用对治疗联盟(0.941)和工作投入(0.930)具有总体上强的正向统计显著效应(<0.05),治疗联盟对工作投入(0.694)具有总体上正向的平均统计显著效应(<0.05)。这些发现表明将人工智能应用和治疗联盟技能纳入培训和专业发展计划的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/e611eb1208a0/behavsci-15-00021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/cd4dd1d46623/behavsci-15-00021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/8a87a7386b01/behavsci-15-00021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/e611eb1208a0/behavsci-15-00021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/cd4dd1d46623/behavsci-15-00021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/8a87a7386b01/behavsci-15-00021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af32/11762742/e611eb1208a0/behavsci-15-00021-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Causal Relationships Between the Use of AI, Therapeutic Alliance, and Job Engagement Among Psychological Service Practitioners.人工智能的使用、治疗联盟与心理服务从业者工作投入之间的因果关系
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;15(1):21. doi: 10.3390/bs15010021.
2
Psychological flow and mental immunity as predictors of job performance for mental health care practitioners during COVID-19.心理流畅和心理免疫作为心理健康护理从业者在 COVID-19 期间工作表现的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):e0311909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311909. eCollection 2024.
3
When does spiritual intelligence particularly predict job engagement? The mediating role of psychological empowerment.精神智力在何时能特别预测工作投入?心理授权的中介作用。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):589-594. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.197676.
4
Associations between attachment, therapeutic alliance, and engagement in black people with psychosis living in the UK.英国黑人精神病患者的依恋、治疗联盟与参与度之间的关联。
J Ment Health. 2022 Oct;31(5):716-723. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022613. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Does the Digital Therapeutic Alliance Exist? Integrative Review.数字疗法联盟是否存在?综合综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 7;12:e69294. doi: 10.2196/69294.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Explaining engagement in outpatient therapy among adults with serious mental health conditions by degree of therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, and perceived coercion.解释严重精神健康状况成年人参与门诊治疗的程度,包括治疗联盟、治疗师同理心和感知到的强制程度。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2022 Mar;45(1):79-88. doi: 10.1037/prj0000490. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Artificial intelligence in radiology: Are Saudi residents ready, prepared, and knowledgeable?人工智能在放射学中的应用:沙特居民是否已做好准备并具备相关知识?
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jan;43(1):53-60. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210337.
9
Productive employment and decent work: The impact of AI adoption on psychological contracts, job engagement and employee trust.生产性就业与体面工作:人工智能应用对心理契约、工作投入和员工信任的影响。
J Bus Res. 2021 Jul;131:485-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic alliance, engagement, and outcome in psychological therapies for psychosis.系统评价和荟萃分析心理治疗精神病学中的治疗联盟、参与度和结果。
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Sep;94(3):822-853. doi: 10.1111/papt.12330. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy: a systematic review of conceptualizations and measures for face-to-face- and online-psychotherapy.成人个体心理治疗中的治疗联盟:面对面和在线心理治疗概念化与测量方法的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1293851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293851. eCollection 2024.
2
Opening the Black Box of Family-Based Treatments: An Artificial Intelligence Framework to Examine Therapeutic Alliance and Therapist Empathy.打开基于家庭的治疗的“黑箱”:一种人工智能框架,用于考察治疗联盟和治疗师共情。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;26(4):975-993. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00451-6. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
The alliance in mental health care: conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications.
精神卫生保健中的联盟:概念化、证据及临床应用
World Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;22(1):25-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.21035.
4
Evaluating the Therapeutic Alliance With a Free-Text CBT Conversational Agent (Wysa): A Mixed-Methods Study.使用自由文本认知行为疗法对话代理(Wysa)评估治疗联盟:一项混合方法研究。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 11;4:847991. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.847991. eCollection 2022.
5
Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Psychotherapy: A New Therapeutic Tool or Agent?会话式人工智能在心理治疗中的应用:新的治疗工具还是治疗师?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 May;23(5):4-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2048739. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Application of structural equation modeling to develop a conceptual model for entrepreneurship for psychological service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.应用结构方程模型构建新冠疫情期间心理服务工作者创业概念模型。
Work. 2021;69(4):1127-1141. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205245.
7
The Digital Therapeutic Alliance: Prospects and Considerations.数字疗法联盟:前景与思考
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jul 20;8(7):e31385. doi: 10.2196/31385.
8
Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Psychotherapy Research and Practice?人工智能能否提高心理治疗研究和实践水平?
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Sep;47(5):852-855. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01056-9.
9
Assessing the alliance-outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons.评估调整了患者特征和治疗过程的联盟结局关联:直接比较的荟萃分析总结。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Nov;67(6):706-711. doi: 10.1037/cou0000424. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology.老年医学中的效应量指南、样本量计算与统计效能
Innov Aging. 2019 Sep 4;3(4):igz036. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz036. eCollection 2019 Aug.