Legault Elise P, Ribeiro Paula A B, Moreau-Amaru Danielle, Robert Emmanuelle, Forte Sara, Comtois Alain S, Samouëlian Vanessa, Tournoux François
Coeurlab Research Unit, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
Département des Sciences de l'Activité Physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H2L 1Y4, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 20;32(1):55. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010055.
Patients with endometrial neoplasia (EN) often have multiple comorbidities and a higher surgical risk. Prehabilitation programs (PPs) combine various interventions to improve preoperative conditions and reduce impairment due to surgical stress. We conducted a pragmatic pilot study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a trimodal telehealth PP (exercise, nutrition, and psychological support) for EN patients. The participants could select their exercise group: (1) a supervised PP (SPP), group sessions 3×/week; (2) a semi-supervised PP (SSPP), group session 1×/week, training alone 2×/week; or (3) a physical activity counseling session (PACS). Out of the 150 EN patients awaiting surgery screened during the 18 months of the study recruitment, 66% (99/150) were eligible, and 40% consented to participate (SPP, n = 13; SSPP, n = 17; PACS, n = 9). The overall dropout was low (13%; 5/39), with no significant differences across groups. No serious adverse events occurred. We observed a positive impact on different outcomes across the different groups, such as in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy quality of life score (SPP; delta = 6.1 [CI: 0.9; 12.6]) and functional capacity measured using the 30″ sit-to-stand test (PACS delta = 2.4 [CI: 1.2; 3.6]). The same-day hospital leave was high in the SSPP group (54.5%). Our pilot telehealth PP seems to be safe, feasible, and well accepted and may procure clinical and patient-centered gains that need to be confirmed in a larger trial.
子宫内膜肿瘤(EN)患者通常合并多种疾病,手术风险较高。术前康复计划(PPs)结合了各种干预措施,以改善术前状况并减少手术应激造成的损伤。我们进行了一项实用的试点研究,以评估针对EN患者的三模式远程医疗PP(运动、营养和心理支持)的可接受性和可行性。参与者可以选择他们的运动组:(1)有监督的PP(SPP),每周3次小组课程;(2)半监督的PP(SSPP),每周1次小组课程,每周单独训练2次;或(3)体育活动咨询课程(PACS)。在研究招募的18个月期间筛选的150名等待手术的EN患者中,66%(99/150)符合条件,40%同意参与(SPP组,n = 13;SSPP组,n = 17;PACS组,n = 9)。总体退出率较低(13%;5/39),各组之间无显著差异。未发生严重不良事件。我们观察到不同组对不同结局有积极影响,例如癌症治疗功能评估生活质量评分(SPP组;变化值=6.1[可信区间:0.9;12.6])以及使用30秒坐立试验测量的功能能力(PACS组变化值=2.4[可信区间:1.2;3.6])。SSPP组的当日出院率较高(54.5%)。我们的试点远程医疗PP似乎是安全、可行且易于接受的,可能会带来以临床和患者为中心的益处,这需要在更大规模的试验中得到证实。