Suppr超能文献

机器人手术与胸骨切开术、开胸手术及电视胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤的比较:短期结果的对比分析

Robotic Versus Sternotomy, Thoracotomy and Video-Thoracoscopy Approaches for Thymoma Resection: A Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Results.

作者信息

Trabalza Marinucci Beatrice, Tiracorrendo Matteo, Vanni Camilla, Messa Fabiana, Piccioni Giorgia, Siciliani Alessandra, Fiorelli Silvia, Ibrahim Mohsen, Rendina Erino A, D'Andrilli Antonio

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sant'Andrea, Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Department of Anesthesiology, Sant'Andrea, Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 17;15(1):34. doi: 10.3390/jpm15010034.

Abstract

. The optimal surgical approach for thymoma resection is still an object of debate. The increasing experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has led to the progressive affirmation of this technique as a valid alternative to Sternotomy, Thoracotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) in this setting. The present study aims to compare the post-operative and short-term results of RATS Thymectomy for thymoma with those of other main surgical approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy and VATS) from a high-volume single center. . Between May 2021 and September 2023, 40 consecutive patients underwent RATS Thymectomy for stage I to limited-stage III thymoma in our center. Three homogenous groups of patients who received thymoma resection through main alternative approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy, VATS) over the last 5 years, were identified in order to perform a comparative analysis. Data including surgery duration, associated resections, conversion rate, overall morbidity, tumor size, radicality of resection, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay and cosmetic results were retrospectively collected and compared between the RATS and each control group. Mean tumor size was higher in the sternotomy group, but not significantly. The mean operative time of RATS interventions was significantly lower than that of sternotomy and VATS. It was significantly shorter compared to thoracotomy if excluding docking-undocking time. A higher rate of associated adjacent structures resection was reported in the sternotomy group ( = 0.005). Conversion rate was significantly higher in the VATS group ( = 0.026) compared to RATS. Post-operative pain at 24 and 48 h was significantly lower in the RATS group compared to the others. Improved cosmetics results were reported after RATS compared to sternotomy ( = 0.0001) and thoracotomy ( = 0.001) groups, with a trend towards better results compared to VATS ( = 0.05). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the RATS group with a significant difference vs. the sternotomy group ( < 0.001). These results from a single center confirm the safety and efficacy of RATS for the treatment of limited stage thymoma. An advantage in terms of operative outcomes, post-operative pain, cosmetic results and hospital stay was observed if compared to the alternative approaches. The short-term oncologic outcome was excellent based on the high complete resection rate of the tumor.

摘要

胸腺瘤切除的最佳手术方式仍存在争议。机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)经验的不断积累,使得该技术在这种情况下逐渐被认可为胸骨切开术、开胸手术和电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的有效替代方案。本研究旨在比较高容量单中心RATS胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤与其他主要手术方式(胸骨切开术、开胸手术和VATS)的术后及短期结果。2021年5月至2023年9月,本中心40例连续患者接受了RATS胸腺切除术,用于治疗I期至局限期III期胸腺瘤。确定了在过去5年中通过主要替代手术方式(胸骨切开术、开胸手术、VATS)接受胸腺瘤切除的三组同质患者,以进行比较分析。回顾性收集并比较了RATS组与各对照组之间的数据,包括手术时长、联合切除情况、中转率、总体发病率、肿瘤大小、切除彻底性、术后疼痛、住院时间和美容效果。胸骨切开术组的平均肿瘤大小更高,但差异不显著。RATS手术的平均手术时间显著低于胸骨切开术和VATS。如果排除对接 - 脱开时间,与开胸手术相比显著更短。胸骨切开术组报告的联合相邻结构切除率更高(P = 0.005)。VATS组的中转率显著高于RATS组(P = 0.026)。RATS组术后24小时和48小时的疼痛明显低于其他组。与胸骨切开术组(P = 0.0001)和开胸手术组(P = 0.001)相比,RATS术后美容效果更佳,与VATS组相比有更好效果的趋势(P = 0.05)。RATS组的住院时间更短,与胸骨切开术组有显著差异(P < 0.001)。来自单中心的这些结果证实了RATS治疗局限期胸腺瘤的安全性和有效性。与替代手术方式相比,在手术结果、术后疼痛、美容效果和住院时间方面具有优势。基于肿瘤的高完全切除率,短期肿瘤学结果良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eae/11767127/b6fa7a61120b/jpm-15-00034-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验