D'Archi Sabatino, Carnassale Beatrice, Sanchez Alejandro Martin, Accetta Cristina, Belli Paolo, De Lauretis Flavia, Di Guglielmo Enrico, Di Leone Alba, Franco Antonio, Magno Stefano, Moschella Francesca, Natale Maria, Scardina Lorenzo, Silenzi Marta, Masetti Riccardo, Franceschini Gianluca
Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 18;15(1):36. doi: 10.3390/jpm15010036.
B3 breast lesions, classified as lesions of uncertain malignant potential, present a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and variable risk of progression to malignancy. These lesions, which include atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), papillary lesions (PLs), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), radial scars (RSs), lobular neoplasia (LN), and phyllodes tumors (PTs), occupy a "grey zone" between benign and malignant pathologies, making their management complex and often controversial. This article explores the diagnostic difficulties associated with B3 lesions, focusing on the limitations of current imaging techniques, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the challenges in histopathological interpretation. Core needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) are widely used for diagnosis, but both methods have inherent limitations, including sampling errors and the inability to determine malignancy in some cases definitively. The therapeutic approach to B3 lesions is nuanced, with treatment decisions strongly influenced by factors such as the lesion size, radiological findings, histopathological characteristics, and patient factors. While some lesions can be safely monitored with watchful waiting, others may require vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) or surgical excision to rule out malignancy. The decision-making process is further complicated by the discordance between the BI-RADS score and biopsy results, as well as the presence of additional risk factors, such as microcalcifications. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the current diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies for B3 lesions, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to management. By synthesizing the most recent research, this article aims to provide clinicians with a clearer understanding of the complexities involved in diagnosing and treating B3 breast lesions while highlighting areas for future research, such as artificial intelligence and genomics, to improve the diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
B3类乳腺病变被归类为恶性潜能不确定的病变,由于其性质异质性以及进展为恶性肿瘤的风险各异,给诊断和治疗带来了重大挑战。这些病变包括非典型导管增生(ADH)、乳头状病变(PLs)、扁平上皮异型增生(FEA)、放射状瘢痕(RSs)、小叶肿瘤(LN)和叶状肿瘤(PTs),它们处于良性和恶性病变之间的“灰色地带”,使得其管理复杂且常常存在争议。本文探讨了与B3类病变相关的诊断困难,重点关注当前成像技术的局限性,包括乳腺X线摄影、超声和磁共振成像(MRI),以及组织病理学解释方面的挑战。粗针活检(CNB)和真空辅助活检(VAB)被广泛用于诊断,但这两种方法都有其固有的局限性,包括取样误差以及在某些情况下无法明确确定恶性肿瘤。B3类病变的治疗方法较为微妙,治疗决策受到病变大小、放射学表现、组织病理学特征和患者因素等多种因素的强烈影响。虽然一些病变可以通过密切观察安全地进行监测,但其他病变可能需要真空辅助切除(VAE)或手术切除以排除恶性肿瘤。BI-RADS评分与活检结果之间的不一致以及微钙化等其他风险因素的存在,进一步使决策过程复杂化。本综述对B3类病变当前的诊断挑战和治疗策略进行了深入分析,强调了多学科管理方法的重要性。通过综合最新研究,本文旨在使临床医生更清楚地了解诊断和治疗B3类乳腺病变所涉及的复杂性,同时突出人工智能和基因组学等未来研究领域,以提高诊断准确性和患者治疗效果。