• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高能力与中等能力大学生的人格差异

Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.

作者信息

Flores-Bravo Juan Francisco, Rodríguez-Naveiras Elena, Valadez Sierra María de Los Dolores, Costantini Dylan, Borges África

机构信息

University Center of Health Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

J Intell. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13010007.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13010007
PMID:39852416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11765854/
Abstract

Despite the growing body of research examining the personality traits of individuals with high abilities, little clarity exists about how they differ from the general population, especially within the university context. This study aimed to identify distinct personality traits by examining 268 high-ability university students alongside a matched average-ability group through a retrospective ex post facto design. Results revealed significant differences only in the trait of responsibility ( = 0.037), with lower scores observed among high-ability students. This outcome may be related to specific academic environmental factors, such as insufficient challenges. It can be concluded that, although stereotypes often associate high-ability students with certain personality traits, such as openness to experience, the present results do not reflect such differences. Therefore, it is important to conduct well-designed studies to determine the characteristics of high-ability individuals and how they differ from average-ability students.

摘要

尽管对高能力个体的人格特质进行研究的文献越来越多,但对于他们与普通人群的差异,尤其是在大学环境中的差异,仍知之甚少。本研究旨在通过回顾性事后设计,对268名高能力大学生和一个匹配的平均能力组进行研究,以确定不同的人格特质。结果显示,仅在责任感特质上存在显著差异(p = 0.037),高能力学生的得分较低。这一结果可能与特定的学术环境因素有关,比如挑战不足。可以得出结论,尽管刻板印象通常将高能力学生与某些人格特质联系在一起,比如开放性经验,但目前的结果并未反映出此类差异。因此,开展精心设计的研究以确定高能力个体的特征以及他们与平均能力学生的差异非常重要。

相似文献

1
Differences in Personality Between High-Ability and Average-Ability University Students.高能力与中等能力大学生的人格差异
J Intell. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13010007.
2
Academic Burnout, Personality, and Academic Variables in University Students.大学生的学业倦怠、人格与学业变量
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 3;14(6):1561-1571. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14060103.
3
Role of personality traits in collaborative group works at flipped classrooms.人格特质在翻转课堂合作小组作业中的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 11:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02702-1.
4
The relationship between family function and personality traits with general self-efficacy (parallel samples studies).家庭功能与人格特质与一般自我效能感的关系(平行样本研究)。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Aug 27;8(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00462-w.
5
Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits of University Students in Dentistry, Medicine and Pharmacy Degrees.牙科、医学和药学专业大学生的情商与人格特质
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):1757-1768. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14060116.
6
Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits Based on Academic Performance.基于学业成绩的情商与人格特质
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:894570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894570. eCollection 2022.
7
Relation between students' personality traits and their preferred teaching methods: Students at the university of Ghana and the Huzhou Normal University.学生性格特质与其偏好的教学方法之间的关系:加纳大学和湖州师范学院的学生
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 16;9(1):e13011. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Examining Gender Differences, Personality Traits, Academic Performance, and Motivation in Ukrainian and Polish Students of Physical Education: A Cross-Cultural Study.审视乌克兰和波兰体育教育专业学生的性别差异、人格特质、学业表现和动机:一项跨文化研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;17(16):5729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165729.
9
Personality Traits of Croatian University Students with Internet Addiction.患有网络成瘾症的克罗地亚大学生的人格特质
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jun 1;12(6):173. doi: 10.3390/bs12060173.
10
Conscientiousness Counts: How Personality Traits Impact Laparoscopic Surgical Skill Improvement in Medical Students.尽责性很重要:人格特质如何影响医学生腹腔镜手术技能的提高。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Oct;80(10):1412-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There a "Gifted Personality"? Initial Evidence for Differences between MENSA and General Population Members in the HEXACO Personality Inventory.是否存在“天赋人格”?关于门萨会员与普通人群在HEXACO人格量表上差异的初步证据。
J Intell. 2022 Oct 26;10(4):92. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040092.
2
Emotional Intelligence Profiles and Self-Esteem/Self-Concept: An Analysis of Relationships in Gifted Students.情绪智力特征与自尊/自我概念:对资优学生关系的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 23;18(3):1006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031006.
3
The Relation of Personality and Intelligence-What Can the Brunswik Symmetry Principle Tell Us?人格与智力的关系——布伦斯维克对称原理能告诉我们什么?
J Intell. 2018 Jul 3;6(3):30. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030030.
4
Personality and gender differences in global perspective.全球视角下的人格与性别差异。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Dec;52 Suppl 1:45-56. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12265. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Children's behavioral regulation and literacy: The impact of the first grade classroom environment.儿童的行为调节与读写能力:一年级课堂环境的影响
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):409-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood.开放性作为抵御认知衰退的缓冲因素:应用于成年晚期的开放性-流体智力-晶体智力(OFCI)模型
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):573-88. doi: 10.1037/a0039493. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
[Evidence against the myth of adjustment problems of people with high intellectual abilities].[反对高智力人群存在适应问题这一谬论的证据]
Psicothema. 2011 Aug;23(3):362-7.
8
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.跨工具和观察者的人格五因素模型的验证
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):81-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.81.