Suppr超能文献

了解出院后时期自杀研究中的依从率。

Understanding Compliance Rates in Suicide Research During the Post-Discharge Period.

作者信息

Schatten Heather T, Wallace Gemma T, Kimble Sara K, Bozzay Melanie L

机构信息

Psychosocial Research Program, Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Feb;55(1):e13167. doi: 10.1111/sltb.13167.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The period following discharge from psychiatric hospitalization is one of particularly elevated suicide risk. It is essential to better understand risk factors for suicide during this period; however, retention and compliance in longitudinal research can be a challenge with high-risk populations.

METHODS

We examined compliance rates in the six-month period following psychiatric hospital discharge among 174 adults (149 psychiatric patients and 25 healthy controls) across three data collection methods: ecological momentary assessment (EMA), weekly clinical assessment phone calls, and clinical follow-up assessments at two- and six-months post-discharge. We examined whether clinical and demographic characteristics influenced compliance rates.

RESULTS

Results suggested low rates of EMA compliance, but strong rates of completion of weekly phone calls and follow-up assessments. Compared to psychiatric patients, healthy controls completed more EMA and weekly phone calls, but not follow-up assessments. Participants who met current diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode and who scored above the clinical threshold for borderline personality disorder symptoms had lower EMA compliance rates.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have important implications for strategies to improve patient engagement in research during this high-risk period.

摘要

引言

从精神病院出院后的这段时间是自杀风险特别高的时期之一。更好地了解这一时期的自杀风险因素至关重要;然而,对于高危人群来说,纵向研究中的保留率和依从性可能是一个挑战。

方法

我们通过三种数据收集方法,对174名成年人(149名精神病患者和25名健康对照者)出院后六个月内的依从率进行了研究:生态瞬时评估(EMA)、每周临床评估电话以及出院后两个月和六个月的临床随访评估。我们研究了临床和人口统计学特征是否会影响依从率。

结果

结果表明EMA的依从率较低,但每周电话随访和随访评估的完成率较高。与精神病患者相比,健康对照者完成了更多的EMA和每周电话随访,但随访评估除外。符合当前重度抑郁发作诊断标准且边缘性人格障碍症状评分高于临床阈值的参与者,其EMA依从率较低。

结论

这些发现对于改善这一高危时期患者参与研究的策略具有重要意义。

相似文献

10
Suicide in borderline patients--predictive factors.边缘型人格障碍患者的自杀——预测因素
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Sep;84(3):283-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03145.x.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验