Hayato Seiichi, Hamuro Lora, Shimizu Toshio, Yonemori Kan, Nishio Shin, Yunokawa Mayu, Yoshida Tatsuya, Nishio Makoto, Matsumoto Koji, Takehara Kazuhiro, Hasegawa Kosei, Kozuki Toshiyuki, Hirashima Yasuyuki, Kato Hidenori, Miura Takuma, Nomoto Maiko, Zhao Yue, Zhu Li, Yasuda Sanae
Eisai Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;65(6):751-762. doi: 10.1002/jcph.6187. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
The first-in-human, Phase 1 Study 101 showed antitumor activity and a tolerable safety profile of farletuzumab ecteribulin in Japanese patients with platinum-resistant ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer. A pharmacometric assessment evaluated farletuzumab ecteribulin pharmacokinetics and exposure-response (E-R) relationships for efficacy and safety to support dose optimization. Patients received 0.3-1.2 mg/kg of farletuzumab ecteribulin intravenously every 3 weeks. A pharmacokinetics (PK) model was developed and used for E-R analyses. Efficacy was assessed via tumor response and safety via known treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of farletuzumab ecteribulin, particularly pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD). Dosing scenarios were simulated to identify dosing that maximizes the probability of an objective response while minimizing the risk of ILD. The farletuzumab ecteribulin PK dataset included 1261 observations from 82 patients. The final model included an estimated population mean value for farletuzumab ecteribulin clearance of 0.0162 L/h. Body surface area (BSA) was a significant PK covariate and was included in the model. Body weight (BW) was associated with higher farletuzumab ecteribulin exposure. Using BW-based dosing, farletuzumab ecteribulin AUC (area under the serum concentration-time curve) was higher in patients with tumor response or stable disease versus patients with progressive disease and higher in patients with ILD and other TEAEs. Dosing simulations showed that BSA-based dosing (33 mg/m) yielded similar tumor responses to BW-based dosing (0.9 mg/kg) and decreased ILD rates. This study showed that BW-based dosing resulted in higher risks of ILD events for patients with a high BW versus low BW, whereas BSA-based dosing is predicted to reduce this risk while maintaining clinical efficacy.
首次人体1期研究101显示,法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林在日本铂耐药卵巢癌和非小细胞肺癌患者中具有抗肿瘤活性且安全性可耐受。一项药代动力学评估对法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林的药代动力学及疗效和安全性的暴露-反应(E-R)关系进行了评估,以支持剂量优化。患者每3周静脉注射0.3-1.2mg/kg的法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林。建立了药代动力学(PK)模型并用于E-R分析。通过肿瘤反应评估疗效,通过法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林已知的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)评估安全性,尤其是肺炎/间质性肺病(ILD)。模拟给药方案以确定在使客观缓解概率最大化的同时将ILD风险降至最低的给药方式。法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林PK数据集包括来自82名患者的1261条观察数据。最终模型包括法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林清除率的估计群体均值为0.0162L/h。体表面积(BSA)是一个显著的PK协变量并纳入模型。体重(BW)与更高的法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林暴露相关。采用基于BW的给药方式时,有肿瘤反应或病情稳定的患者的法乐妥珠单抗艾克替布林AUC(血清浓度-时间曲线下面积)高于病情进展的患者,患有ILD和其他TEAE的患者也更高。给药模拟显示,基于BSA的给药(33mg/m²)与基于BW的给药(0.9mg/kg)产生相似的肿瘤反应,并降低了ILD发生率。该研究表明,基于BW的给药方式使高体重患者发生ILD事件的风险高于低体重患者,而基于BSA的给药预计可降低该风险,同时维持临床疗效。