Ortiz Fernanda, Salonsalmi Aino, Helanterä Ilkka
Helsinki University Hospital, Abdominal Centre, Nephrology and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital, Abdominal Centre, Transplantation and Liver Surgery, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317435. eCollection 2025.
Patients with end-stage kidney disease often prefer home-based dialysis due to higher self-efficacy, which relates to improved medical treatment adherence. Kidney transplantation (KT) success depends on adhering to immunosuppressive medication post-transplant.
To investigate whether adherence post-kidney transplantation (KT) and patients' attitudes toward immunosuppression were influenced by their prior dialysis type modality. Additionally, the study examined if adherence and patient's attitudes towards immunosuppression are associated with kidney graft survival.
This cross-sectional single-center study included 201 KT patients. Adherence was assessed using BAASIS and the coefficient of variation of calcineurin inhibitors (COV-CNI). Patient attitudes towards medication were evaluated using the Q-method. Pill burden, comorbidity score and HRQoL and medication complexity, were scored. Cox regression was applied to determine KT survival outcomes over a 14-year follow-up period (until Dec 2021).
Prior dialysis modality was not associated with adherence to immunosuppression post-KT evaluated by BAASIS on average 4.7 years post-KT. Previous in-center hemodialysis patients had a higher CNI-COV (p = 0.011). The Q-sort analysis identified fully adherent patients linked to profile 1 (organized, resilient) whereas profile 2 patients were more careless. Patients linked to profile 3 (challenging, nervous) had higher education, a higher pill burden, and experienced more immunosuppression side effects. Death-censored graft loss increased by 7.6% with each additional pill, quadrupled if one dose of immunosuppression was missed, and increased by 2.9% for each point of COV-CNI rise.
Adherence to immunosuppression post-KT using BAASIS was not associated with prior dialysis type, despite in-center hemodialysis patients showing the highest COV-CNI. Taking COV-CNI into account, managing missed doses of immunosuppressants, and exploring patient attitudes could potentially enhance adherence and consequently improve KT survival.
终末期肾病患者通常因自我效能较高而更倾向于家庭透析,自我效能较高与改善医疗治疗依从性相关。肾移植(KT)的成功取决于移植后坚持服用免疫抑制药物。
调查肾移植(KT)后的依从性以及患者对免疫抑制的态度是否受其先前透析方式的影响。此外,该研究还考察了依从性和患者对免疫抑制的态度是否与肾移植存活相关。
这项横断面单中心研究纳入了201例KT患者。使用BAASIS和钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的变异系数(COV-CNI)评估依从性。使用Q方法评估患者对药物的态度。对药丸负担、合并症评分、健康相关生活质量和药物复杂性进行评分。应用Cox回归确定14年随访期(直至2021年12月)内的KT存活结果。
在KT后平均4.7年通过BAASIS评估,先前的透析方式与KT后免疫抑制的依从性无关。先前接受中心血液透析的患者CNI-COV较高(p = 0.011)。Q分类分析确定完全依从的患者与概况1(有条理、有韧性)相关,而概况2的患者则更粗心。与概况3(有挑战性、紧张)相关的患者教育程度较高、药丸负担较重,且经历的免疫抑制副作用较多。每增加一粒药丸,死亡审查后的移植肾丢失增加7.6%,如果错过一剂免疫抑制药物则增加四倍,COV-CNI每升高一个点增加2.9%。
尽管接受中心血液透析的患者CNI-COV最高,但使用BAASIS评估的KT后免疫抑制依从性与先前的透析方式无关。考虑到COV-CNI、管理免疫抑制药物漏服情况以及探索患者态度可能会提高依从性,从而改善KT存活情况。