• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interventions to improve health care provider implementation and patient adherence of patients to recommendations on geriatric assessment and management in older adults: A scoping review protocol.改善医疗保健提供者对老年人进行老年评估和管理建议的实施情况以及患者依从性的干预措施:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317177. eCollection 2025.
2
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
3
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.
4
Methodological considerations for assessing elder mistreatment of older adults with cognitive impairment: A scoping review protocol.评估认知障碍老年人受虐待情况的方法学考量:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 27;20(3):e0320689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320689. eCollection 2025.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Attitudes of healthcare professionals in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: a scoping review protocol.医护专业人员在治疗老年癌症患者决策中的态度:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 11;13(10):e077628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077628.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
9
Digital health interventions and quality of home-based primary care for older adults: A scoping review protocol.数字健康干预措施和家庭初级保健老年人质量:范围综述方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1022587. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022587. eCollection 2022.
10
Help-seeking behaviours among older adults: a scoping review protocol.老年人求助行为的研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e043554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043554.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in older cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年癌症患者的老年综合评估和管理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Dec 6;115(12):1483-1496. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad200.
2
Geriatric assessment and treatment decision-making in surgical oncology.老年医学评估与肿瘤外科治疗决策
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 1;17(1):22-30. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000635. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
Management of Frailty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.衰弱管理:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Oct;20(10):1190-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.009.
4
Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.提升混合方法评价工具的内容效度:一项改良版的电子德尔菲研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:49-59.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
5
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).改进一种用于评估定性、定量和混合方法研究质量的工具——混合方法评估工具(MMAT)的实用性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):459-467. doi: 10.1111/jep.12884. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted to a surgical service.对入住外科病房的老年人进行综合老年评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1(1):CD012485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012485.pub2.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital.对入院老年人进行综合老年评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.
10
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

改善医疗保健提供者对老年人进行老年评估和管理建议的实施情况以及患者依从性的干预措施:一项范围综述方案。

Interventions to improve health care provider implementation and patient adherence of patients to recommendations on geriatric assessment and management in older adults: A scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Freeman Laura, Smith Ainslee, Ku Nai-Wen, Ayala Ana Patricia, Bennie Fay, Berger Arielle, Chesney Tyler R, Desforges Ploa, Haase Kristen, Jones Jennifer, Lacerte Annie, Mariano Caroline, Mehta Rajin, Menjak Ines, Monette Johanne, Norman Richard, Legacy Nicholas, Antonio Maryjo, Pitters Eric, Stephens Anne, Stephens Douglas, Wan-Chow-Wah Doreen, Wong Camilla L, Alibhai Shabbir M H, Puts Martine

机构信息

Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Gerstein Information Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317177. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317177
PMID:39854576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11760611/
Abstract

The world population is aging. Comprehensive Geriatric assessment (CGA) has been proven to improve the well-being of older adults. However, evidence suggests not all clinicians implement these recommendations in their practice; nor do all patients adhere to them. Currently, there is no up-to-date review of interventions that can improve older adults' adherence to CGA recommendations and health care provider/clinician implementation of those recommendations. The objective of this scoping review protocol is to describe the methodology of the scoping review with the aim to identify interventions that have been tested to improve adherence to CGA recommendations. We will use the Arksey and O'Malley framework and subsequent extension by Levac and colleagues to complete the scoping review. We searched OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to November 14, 2024, and will include a review of reference lists of included studies. Studies eligible for inclusion are studies of any design that examined one or more interventions aiming to improve clinician implementation of and patient adherence to CGA in any clinical setting. We will use standard methods for study selection, data abstraction, assessment of methodological quality of individual studies, and data synthesis. Results will be analyzed and reported using descriptive numerical summaries and narrative analysis. Findings from the scoping review will be published in a manuscript and presented at scientific conferences.

摘要

世界人口正在老龄化。综合老年评估(CGA)已被证明能改善老年人的福祉。然而,有证据表明并非所有临床医生在实践中都执行这些建议;也并非所有患者都遵循这些建议。目前,对于能够提高老年人对CGA建议的依从性以及医疗保健提供者/临床医生对这些建议的执行情况的干预措施,尚无最新的综述。本范围综述方案的目的是描述范围综述的方法,旨在确定已进行测试以提高对CGA建议依从性的干预措施。我们将使用阿克西和奥马利框架以及莱瓦克及其同事随后的扩展框架来完成范围综述。我们检索了从数据库建立至2024年11月14日的OVID MEDLINE、OVID Embase、EBSCO CINAHL、APA PsychInfo和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库,并将对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行综述。纳入的合格研究是任何设计的研究,这些研究在任何临床环境中检验了一种或多种旨在提高临床医生对CGA的执行情况以及患者对CGA的依从性的干预措施。我们将使用标准方法进行研究选择、数据提取、评估单个研究的方法学质量以及数据综合。结果将使用描述性数值摘要和叙述性分析进行分析和报告。范围综述的结果将发表在一份手稿中,并在科学会议上展示。