Postgraduate in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Technical School of Health of Cajazeiras, Teacher Training Center, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Brazil.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1022587. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022587. eCollection 2022.
INTRODUCTION: The use of digital health interventions has expanded, particularly in home-based primary care (HBPC), following the increase in the older adult population and the need to respond to the higher demand of chronic conditions, weakness and loss of autonomy of this population. There was an even greater demand with COVID-19 and subsequent isolation/social distancing measures for this risk group. The objective of this study is to map and identify the uses and types of digital health interventions and their reported impacts on the quality of HBPC for older adults worldwide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a scoping review protocol which will enable a rigorous, transparent and reliable synthesis of knowledge. The review will be developed from the theoretical perspective of Arksey and O'malley, with updates by Levac and Peters and respective collaborators based on the Joanna Briggs Institute manual, and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Data from white literature will be extracted from multidisciplinary health databases such as: the Virtual Health Library, LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl and Embase; while Google Scholar will be used for gray literature. No date limit or language restrictions will be determined. The quantitative data will be analyzed through descriptive statistics and qualitative data through thematic analysis. The results will be submitted to stakeholder consultation for preliminary sharing of the study and will later be disseminated through publication in open access scientific journals, scientific events and academic and community journals. The full scoping review report will present the main impacts, challenges, opportunities and gaps found in publications related to the use of digital technologies in primary home care. DISCUSSION: The organization of this protocol will increase the methodological rigor, quality, transparency and accuracy of scoping reviews, reducing the risk of bias.
简介：随着老年人口的增加以及需要应对该人群慢性病、虚弱和自主能力丧失的更高需求，数字健康干预措施的使用，尤其是在家庭初级保健 (HBPC) 中得到了扩展。随着 COVID-19 的出现以及对该风险群体的隔离/社会隔离措施的实施，对数字健康干预措施的需求甚至更大。本研究的目的是绘制和识别数字健康干预措施的用途和类型，以及它们对全球老年人 HBPC 质量的报告影响。 方法和分析：这是一个范围审查协议，将能够对知识进行严格、透明和可靠的综合。该审查将从 Arksey 和 O'malley 的理论观点出发，根据 Levac 和 Peters 以及各自的合作者基于 Joanna Briggs 研究所手册的更新，并由系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目 (PRISMA-ScR) 指导。来自多学科健康数据库（如虚拟健康图书馆、LILACS、MEDLINE/PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cinahl 和 Embase）的白文献数据将被提取，而 Google Scholar 将用于灰色文献。将不设定日期限制或语言限制。定量数据将通过描述性统计进行分析，定性数据将通过主题分析进行分析。结果将提交给利益相关者进行咨询，以初步分享研究结果，随后将通过在开放获取科学期刊、科学活动以及学术和社区期刊上发表来传播。完整的范围审查报告将呈现与数字技术在家庭初级保健中的使用相关的出版物中发现的主要影响、挑战、机遇和差距。 讨论：本协议的组织将提高范围审查的方法学严谨性、质量、透明度和准确性，降低偏倚风险。
Front Public Health. 2024
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023-4-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022-10-24
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022-5-31
JMIR Med Inform. 2022-1-21
Zotero 插件