Li Shih-Ming, Chang Yaw-Wen, Lin Ming-Nan, Lin Chi-Wei, Lin Chyi-Her, Li Cheng-Chieh, Lin Ming-Hwai, Chang Yin-Fan, Sun Zih-Jie, Liaw Fang-Yih, Tsai Jaw-Shiun, Hwang Shinn-Jang, Chen Li-Kuang, Wu Jin-Shang
Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien County, Taiwan.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City, Taiwan.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06699-6.
The six core competencies of ACGME - patient care (PC), medical knowledge (MK), systems-based practice (SBP), practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), professionalism (PROF), and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) - represent domains in which physicians must ultimately demonstrate competence. Although the ACGME's six core competencies have been applied in Taiwan with the milestone project, the application of the six core competences in the Family Medicine milestones for residency training have not yet been established.
We recruited 61 family medicine physicians from 25 hospitals from four major geographic areas for a Delphi round one survey and 72 physicians from 27 hospitals for a Delphi round two survey. With 5-point scales, the Cronbach's alphas for both importance and fitness were 0.98 in round one. In round two, the Cronbach's alphas were 0.86 and 0.83 for importance and fitness. The mode and quartile deviation in Delphi method, importance-performance analysis (IPA), and importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) were used for three stages IPA process.
In IPA, a total of 72.7% (16/22) of the sub-competencies exhibited high importance and fitness, with a mean score ≥ 4.7; the exceptions were PC-1 (cares for acutely ill or injured patients), MK-2 (critical thinking skills in patient care), SBP-1 (cost-conscious medical care), PBLI-3 (improves systems), PROF-3 (humanism/cultural proficiency), and ICS-4 (utilizes technology). In IPMA, the performance value of six core competencies for FMM-Taiwan was 92.6 when considering the importance and fitness indices of the 22 sub-competencies.
The accordance of the ACGME's milestones to Taiwan was acceptable to good and related milestones could been developed for residency training.
美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的六项核心能力——患者护理(PC)、医学知识(MK)、基于系统的实践(SBP)、基于实践的学习与改进(PBLI)、职业素养(PROF)以及人际沟通技能(ICS)——代表了医生最终必须展现能力的领域。尽管ACGME的六项核心能力已通过里程碑项目在台湾应用,但在家庭医学住院医师培训的里程碑中,这六项核心能力的应用尚未确立。
我们从四个主要地理区域的二十五家医院招募了61名家庭医学医生进行第一轮德尔菲调查,并从二十七家医院招募了72名医生进行第二轮德尔菲调查。采用5分制量表,第一轮调查中重要性和适用性的克朗巴哈系数均为0.98。在第二轮调查中,重要性和适用性的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.86和0.83。德尔菲法、重要性-绩效分析(IPA)和重要性-绩效矩阵分析(IPMA)中的众数和四分位偏差用于三个阶段的IPA过程。
在IPA中,共有72.7%(16/22)的子能力表现出高重要性和适用性,平均得分≥4.7;例外情况为PC-1(护理急性病或受伤患者)、MK-2(患者护理中的批判性思维技能)、SBP-1(注重成本的医疗护理)、PBLI-3(改进系统)、PROF-3(人文主义/文化素养)和ICS-4(利用技术)。在IPMA中,考虑22个子能力的重要性和适用性指标时,台湾家庭医学里程碑的六项核心能力的绩效值为92.6。
ACGME的里程碑与台湾的契合度为可接受至良好,并且可以为住院医师培训制定相关的里程碑。