• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲人群肩部生理偏移参数——一项磁共振成像研究

Shoulder Physiological Offset Parameters in Asian Populations-A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

作者信息

Huang Hung-Yi, Lin Meng-Hao, Hsu Chu-Hsiang, Kuo Liang-Tseng

机构信息

Department of Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Yunlin 638502, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;15(2):146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020146.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020146
PMID:39857030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763603/
Abstract

: Physical shoulder offset parameters (SOPs) play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder diseases. However, there is little research analyzing SOPs in healthy shoulders using cross-sectional MRI images, especially in Asians. Therefore, this study aimed to establish physiological reference values of shoulder parameters for Asian populations. : This was a retrospective imaging study using MRI images of the shoulder joints of 500 patients (mean age: 55.9 ± 14.0 years). We measured the following SOPs of the normal joint: HO, GO, lateral glenoidal humeral offset (LGHO), humeral shaft axis offset (HAO), and cortical offset (CO). In addition, the offset parameters were examined for associations with age, gender, side, and osteoarthritis. : The mean HO was 22.9 (±2.4) mm, the mean GO was 62.3 (±6.6) mm, the mean LGHO was 48.9 (±4.2) mm, the mean HAO was 25.2 (±2.8) mm, and the mean CO was 15.7 (±2.7) mm. Male patients exhibited significantly higher values across all SOPs compared to female patients. In addition, there was a significantly lower mean value for HAO in left shoulders (HAO: 24.7± 2.8 mm vs. 25.5 ± 2.8 mm, = 0.011). There was a negatively significant correlation between age and all SOPs. No significant difference in mean values was noted between shoulders with osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis in any SOPs. : Significant gender- and age-specific differences were noted for all measured SOPs. In addition, right shoulders did not show higher mean SOP values than left shoulders, except for HAO, suggesting that the contralateral joint is a reliable reference for surgical planning. These findings should be considered in shoulder surgery planning.

摘要

物理性肩关节偏移参数(SOPs)在肩部疾病的诊断和治疗中发挥着重要作用。然而,利用横断面MRI图像分析健康肩部SOPs的研究较少,尤其是在亚洲人群中。因此,本研究旨在建立亚洲人群肩部参数的生理参考值。

这是一项回顾性影像学研究,使用了500例患者(平均年龄:55.9±14.0岁)肩关节的MRI图像。我们测量了正常关节的以下SOPs:肱骨头偏移(HO)、关节盂偏移(GO)、外侧关节盂肱骨头偏移(LGHO)、肱骨干轴线偏移(HAO)和皮质偏移(CO)。此外,还检查了偏移参数与年龄、性别、患侧以及骨关节炎之间的关联。

平均HO为22.9(±2.4)mm,平均GO为62.3(±6.6)mm,平均LGHO为48.9(±4.2)mm,平均HAO为25.2(±2.8)mm,平均CO为15.7(±2.7)mm。与女性患者相比,男性患者在所有SOPs上的值均显著更高。此外,左肩的HAO平均值显著更低(HAO:24.7±2.8mm对25.5±2.8mm,P = 0.011)。年龄与所有SOPs之间存在显著的负相关。在任何SOPs中,骨关节炎肩部和非骨关节炎肩部的平均值均无显著差异。

所有测量的SOPs均存在显著的性别和年龄特异性差异。此外,除HAO外,右肩的平均SOP值并不高于左肩,这表明对侧关节是手术规划的可靠参考。在肩部手术规划中应考虑这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f8/11763603/912af07f6cac/diagnostics-15-00146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f8/11763603/1b541aadc0b5/diagnostics-15-00146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f8/11763603/912af07f6cac/diagnostics-15-00146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f8/11763603/1b541aadc0b5/diagnostics-15-00146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f8/11763603/912af07f6cac/diagnostics-15-00146-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Shoulder Physiological Offset Parameters in Asian Populations-A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.亚洲人群肩部生理偏移参数——一项磁共振成像研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;15(2):146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020146.
2
Physiological Offset Parameters of the Adult Shoulder Joint-A MRI Study of 800 Patients.成人肩关节的生理偏移参数——800例患者的MRI研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 16;12(10):2507. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102507.
3
Retrospective MRI analysis of 418 adult shoulder joints to assess the physiological morphology of the glenoid in a low-grade osteoarthritic population.对418个成人肩关节进行回顾性MRI分析,以评估低度骨关节炎人群中肩胛盂的生理形态。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01568-6.
4
Premorbid glenoid anatomy reconstruction from contralateral shoulder 3-dimensional measurements: a computed tomography scan analysis of 260 shoulders.从对侧肩部三维测量值重建术前肩盂解剖结构:260 例肩部 CT 扫描分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肱骨偏移作为反式肩关节置换术后结果的预测指标。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6S):S158-S165. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.029. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Differences in Osseous Shoulder Morphology, Scapulothoracic Orientation, and Muscle Volume in Patients With Constitutional Static Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type C1) Compared With Healthy Controls.与健康对照组相比,患有特发性静态后向肩不稳(C1 型)的患者在骨骼肩部形态、肩胛胸廓取向和肌肉体积方面存在差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Apr;52(5):1299-1307. doi: 10.1177/03635465241233706. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Glenoid vault and humeral head alignment in relation to the scapular blade axis in young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head.在患有肱骨头静态后向半脱位的年轻患者中,肩胛切迹轴与肩峰和肱骨头的关系。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):756-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Radiologic midterm results of cemented and uncemented glenoid components in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a matched pair analysis.肩关节原发性骨关节炎中骨水泥型和非骨水泥型关节盂组件的放射学中期结果:配对分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):225-235. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04021-9. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
The osseous morphology of nondegenerated shoulders shows no side-related differences in elderly patients: an analysis of 102 computed tomography scans.非退变肩部的骨形态在老年患者中无侧别差异:102例计算机断层扫描分析
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):1297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.024. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
T1ρ Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Cartilage Damage After Primary Shoulder Dislocation.利用T1ρ磁共振成像评估初次肩关节脱位后的软骨损伤
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2800-2806. doi: 10.1177/0363546516655338. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
In Vivo Anatomical Research by 3D CT Reconstruction Determines Minimum Acromiohumeral, Coracohumeral, and Glenohumeral Distances in the Human Shoulder: Evaluation of Age and Sex Association in a Sample of the Chinese Population.通过三维CT重建进行的体内解剖学研究确定了人体肩部肩峰肱骨、喙肱和盂肱的最小距离:对中国人群样本中年龄和性别关联的评估。
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):1804. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111804.
2
Outcomes after bilateral shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.双侧肩关节置换术后的结局:系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Apr;32(4):861-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
3
Morphology of Humeral Head and Glenoid in Normal Shoulder of Indonesian Population.
印度尼西亚人群正常肩部肱骨头和肩胛盂的形态学
Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Dec 7;14:459-469. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S378658. eCollection 2022.
4
Physiological Offset Parameters of the Adult Shoulder Joint-A MRI Study of 800 Patients.成人肩关节的生理偏移参数——800例患者的MRI研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 16;12(10):2507. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102507.
5
Glenoid Morphology and Related Parameters in Turkish Society.土耳其人群中的肩胛盂形态及相关参数
Cureus. 2022 Aug 13;14(8):e27959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27959. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肱骨偏移作为反式肩关节置换术后结果的预测指标。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6S):S158-S165. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.029. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
3D MRI of the Shoulder.肩部 3D MRI。
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021 Jun;25(3):480-487. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728813. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
8
Promising Mid-Term Outcomes after Humeral Head Preserving Surgery of Posterior Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Humerus.肱骨近端后脱位骨折行肱骨头保留手术后的中期预后良好。
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 27;10(17):3841. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173841.
9
Mid-term outcomes of bony increased offset-reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Asian population.亚洲人群中骨增加偏移-反式全肩关节置换术的中期疗效
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Sep;24(3):125-134. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00087. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.侧方入路与非侧方入路反向全肩关节置换术
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Aug;13(4):358-370. doi: 10.1177/1758573220937412. Epub 2020 Jul 9.